Mini 891 - British Comedy Mafia (Game Over)

Snow_Bunny · Post Post #450 (ISO) » Mon Jan 04, 2010 3:27 pm

Budja wrote:Net is not scum either. Scum would have hammered me and not attacked the mason.

That's assuming you are town, which you are not.

@DS: Net was asking for the other mason to be outed. That's scum as claiming scum.

Budja · Post Post #451 (ISO) » Mon Jan 04, 2010 3:33 pm

Well duh, only I know my alignment. Thats why I asked Death that question.

Netopalis · Post Post #452 (ISO) » Mon Jan 04, 2010 3:44 pm

Snow_Bunny wrote:
Budja wrote:Net is not scum either. Scum would have hammered me and not attacked the mason.
That's assuming you are town, which you are not.

@DS: Net was asking for the other mason to be outed. That's scum as claiming scum.

Yeah, that's not a broad statement at all. At all. Why not examine the reasons behind my request?

Snow_Bunny · Post Post #453 (ISO) » Mon Jan 04, 2010 3:51 pm

Because there's no pro-town reason to ask the other mason partner outed so early.

Netopalis · Post Post #454 (ISO) » Mon Jan 04, 2010 3:52 pm

Sure there is. I think China is lying about his claim.

MacavityLock · Post Post #455 (ISO) » Mon Jan 04, 2010 4:00 pm

China, in your massive blather you have still failed to answer my questions.

MacavityLock wrote:However, I'm still not sure what you mean by
Chinaman wrote:I don't believe his claim at being town and being purely without anything useful.
If I'm interpreting your 430 correctly, you're saying that you don't believe that Budja could possibly be vanilla with no perks. Is this correct, or no? If not, can you please, in a small concise post, explain what you were trying to say here?

I want a yes or no answer to the above, and if your answer is no, I want a

short

explanation. Like under 4 sentences.

MacavityLock wrote:I'm not opposed to a BC wagon at this time, mostly due to the way his votes have fallen.

Budja wrote:@Macavity, then why no vote. Its all very nice of you not to think I'm scum and all but it would really be nice to have a bit of counter-wagonning rather than cruise to a deadline lynch.

Because I wanted to see if you would join my Snow_Bunny wagon without prompting. Now I will prompt. You want to join the Snow_Bunny wagon instead?

We haven't heard from Lyman in a while, by the way. Would he like to weigh in?

And once again, I fail to read the mod's post except for the vote count. My apologies, ort.

Budja · Post Post #456 (ISO) » Mon Jan 04, 2010 4:12 pm

Eh, a snow bunny lynch isn't bad but I have nothing on her save a little gut.

BC, Locke and Fuzzy (his attack on China was scummy) are better IMO.

unvote, vote Snow

, I would gladly switch to lynch the above if anyone is interested.

BloodCovenent · Post Post #457 (ISO) » Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:11 pm

please note mod, that I will be V/LA from Thursday night until saturday night-sunday morning

Chinaman · Post Post #458 (ISO) » Mon Jan 04, 2010 11:23 pm

Mac: No, nothing is impossible. Due to my experience and thinking, odds are (in my mind) that we have very few VT's and I have a gut read that his claim was false. Short enough?

DeathSauce · Post Post #459 (ISO) » Tue Jan 05, 2010 12:26 pm

Budja wrote:Eh, a snow bunny lynch isn't bad but I have nothing on her save a little gut.

BC, Locke and Fuzzy (his attack on China was scummy) are better IMO.

unvote, vote Snow
, I would gladly switch to lynch the above if anyone is interested.

^ Hate this post, again with the opportunistic bandwagon jumping?

Netopalis · Post Post #460 (ISO) » Tue Jan 05, 2010 1:50 pm

Chinaman wrote:Mac: No, nothing is impossible. Due to my experience and thinking, odds are (in my mind) that we have very few VT's and I have a gut read that his claim was false. Short enough?

China, how many mini themes have you played? Do I really need to go back through completed games to give you some statistics?

Budja · Post Post #461 (ISO) » Tue Jan 05, 2010 2:04 pm

Sheesh, read my reasoning Death. I'd rather lynch scum today than die.
If that attitude is opportunistic, then yes I am but I disagree.

Now answer my question.

Fuzzyman · Post Post #462 (ISO) » Tue Jan 05, 2010 3:54 pm

Budja wrote:Sheesh, read my reasoning Death. I'd rather lynch scum today than die.
If that attitude is opportunistic, then yes I am but I disagree.

Now answer my question.

Where does the, "than die," part come from?

Everyone giving me bad looks right now really needs to read Neto's 438. Really a goldmine.

BloodCovenent · Post Post #463 (ISO) » Tue Jan 05, 2010 4:01 pm

Yea dude, Net dies tomorrow.

Netopalis · Post Post #464 (ISO) » Tue Jan 05, 2010 4:05 pm

Fuzzy: You're going to need to elaborate more than that. What exactly about my post in 438 sets you off?

Fuzzyman · Post Post #465 (ISO) » Tue Jan 05, 2010 4:13 pm

Yea dude, Net dies tomorrow.

This is not decided.

Fuzzy: You're going to need to elaborate more than that. What exactly about my post in 438 sets you off?

I really liked the way you articulated in the second to last paragraph.

BloodCovenent · Post Post #466 (ISO) » Tue Jan 05, 2010 4:16 pm

Fuzzyman wrote:
Yea dude, Net dies tomorrow.
This is not decided.

you'd rather lynch him now? I'm down for that.

Netopalis · Post Post #467 (ISO) » Tue Jan 05, 2010 4:16 pm

Oh, sorry. I thought you were attacking me for it. Thanks, then.

Budja · Post Post #468 (ISO) » Tue Jan 05, 2010 4:44 pm

If you really think China is scum, get his partner to claim before LyLo but certainly not day 1.

In the meantime, he might die, his partner might die, he may be investigated/tracked/etc.
He is a bad lynch.

@Fuzzy, well not to be negative but its looking pretty likely to me.

Netopalis · Post Post #469 (ISO) » Tue Jan 05, 2010 4:47 pm

Is it? I don't see any votes...all I see is Chinaman flailing wildly against me, throwing out completely illogical and random attacks...and convincing a few people who should probably know better.

Chinaman · Post Post #470 (ISO) » Tue Jan 05, 2010 11:22 pm

I'm flailing wildly? You would think that since I think your scummy for basically everything you've said about my claim and what you would like to see today because of it.

My claim makes me so easily provable as town it's ridiculous for you to want my lynch.
My claim makes absolutely zero sense to be coming from scum as it's so easily disprovable.
You want me to out my partner for no better reason than to give scum more info going into night
You wanting me lynched (because you think I'm lying...lol) is just another means to out my partner on the first day thus giving scum more info going into night.

Budja hit the nail on the head when he says that I would be a bad lynch. Do you disagree with that? Do you really wanna push a lynch on someone just to give scum 2 confirmed town to choose from during N1? I'm not saying Budja is town, but his view of you wanting my lynch is a pro-town view...yours is not.

To answer your question though net, I have completed 2 mini themes on chinaman. Both were exactly as I have expressed. My opinion of mini themes is based on my experience. Feel free to bring about whatever bogus stats you have. I say bogus because you can't possibly have gone through every single mini theme game to give factual stats about how they are most commonly set up. The best you can do is give stats based on those you have experience or read (prolly more than my 2 but w/e) exactly as I have done. To be honest, I can't fathom why you are hung up on this as I have stated over and over again that this is not the only reason I was voting Budja. I really don't see where you're going with it other than to try and get a wagon on me so that my partner has to be outed in order to save me from being lynched.

I do expect a full explanation to every question and point I have made towards you in this post. Should be interesting to see how you dodge most of them.

Vote: Net

BloodCovenent · Post Post #471 (ISO) » Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:16 am

Chinaman wrote:

Vote: Net

I'd say that was a good call.

unvote,
Vote: net

(L-5)

Netwagon, gogogogogogo (>'')> :arrow:

Netopalis · Post Post #472 (ISO) » Wed Jan 06, 2010 9:08 am

Nobody has really refuted my points against Chinaman. He's ridiculously scummy in this game, and an unwarranted Mason claim does little to avert that scumminess. I will drop the case if someone can find a good, solid reason for a town-aligned mason to claim right before a lynch....But until I see such a post, or I see a better candidate for today, I'm not moving unless we run up against a deadline.

Netopalis · Post Post #473 (ISO) » Wed Jan 06, 2010 9:25 am

Incidentally, I'm going to be on V/LA from midnight to 8 PM tomorrow due to an excruciatingly long drive.

Chinaman · Post Post #474 (ISO) » Wed Jan 06, 2010 12:45 pm

lol at p472. so THAT's how youre going to dodge everything I said about you. Neat. I'm pretty sure you dodged it and posted your p472 because my post makes sense and you can't explain why you want to lynch a claimed mason. The thing is, you can't explain it which is why you ignored it.

FTW to all others. I'm not moving my vote today. period.