Mafia 108 - Mafia With The Quickness - over!

[Incognito]

Vote Count #1 of Day 2

Gayle (1) <-~ Bogre
*Netopalis (4) <-~ Glork, Ellibereth, Zachrulez, Haylen
Bogre (2) <-~ SaintKerrigan, Maemuki
Haylen (1) <-~ Gayle

Not voting (3) <-~ Yosarian2, Netopalis, Kmd4390

With 11 alive, 6 votes will do it.

Note:

an asterisk by a player's name indicates said player would be lynched if Day were to end right this moment without a lynch majority.

Friday, January 15th at 2 P.M. EST

[Haylen]

I got told that Yos can't be lynched. If he isn't NK'd, i tend to presume he's scum. But my accusations on Neto are more concrete, hence the switch ^.^

[Bogre]

I don't like Zach's subtle attack on arguably the most pro-town player in this game (Maemuki). At least the most pro-town player on the Netlava wagon (well, besides me, but I have to say that ).

What makes her pro-town?

[Maemuki]

I got told that Yos can't be lynched. If he isn't NK'd, i tend to presume he's scum. But my accusations on Neto are more concrete, hence the switch ^.^

...then you voted for Yos2 because? You see, I don't think Incog will put an Unlynchable Townie on this setup.

[Haylen]

Yos cant be lynched cause he's a good townie.

[Gayle]

Hey, Gayle! Nice to see you being so opportunistic! Attacking the one other person other than Neto, when a badwagons just started on you!

So I can't point stuff out I don't like if someone is voting me?

[Maemuki]

Yos cant be lynched cause he's a good townie.

Everyone can be lynched, Haylen. If he wasn't killed, camn must have shown signs of power-roleness. I agree with the good townie, but switching your vote because of that only proves that your vote for Yos2 had no reasoning whatsoever.

[SaintKerrigan]

See Gayle's latest post. It's in there.

I actually had to go back to page 20 to see what you were talking about - I started the catchup reading today at page 23 or 24. I had got the wrong impression from Ellibereth's and Gayle's back and forth, and switched their thoughts. Elli was talking about the lynch happening faster, Gayle was opposed.

So, that Gayle was supporting a Neto lynch before he suggested the mislynch is wrong.

He was still not contributing, and possibly knew that a Neto lynch was a mislynch/wanted to avoid a Zachrulez lynch.

But then couldn't you argue that I should also be lynched by the same principle? I also didn't support the Neto bandwagon and I don't feel like I've contributed much. Why Gayle over me?

Also, Maemuki was on the Netlava wagon,

stayed

on the Netlava wagon, even while other people were switching over to Neto or Zach (including me, who had also been on the Netlava wagon with her). Also, my gut feeling says she's town.

@ Haylen: How do you know Yos can't be lynched. Who told you?

[Haylen]

You also can't make cases, talk generally, claim town or play scrabble. They're all scumtells.

[Maemuki]

You also can't make cases, talk generally, claim town or play scrabble. They're all scumtells.

Yay for joke posts when you have perfectly good questions to answer!

[Zachrulez]

I don't like Zach's subtle attack on arguably the most pro-town player in this game (Maemuki). At least the most pro-town player on the Netlava wagon (well, besides me, but I have to say that ).

Not subtle at all. I don't agree with your assessment of Mae.

[Maemuki]

I don't like Zach's subtle attack on arguably the most pro-town player in this game (Maemuki). At least the most pro-town player on the Netlava wagon (well, besides me, but I have to say that ;) ).

Not subtle at all. I don't agree with your assessment of Mae.

If you attack a player, you generally don't think he/she/it is pro-town.

[Haylen]

@ Haylen: How do you know Yos can't be lynched. Who told you?

*points at Zach* It was ages ago. I don't want to discuss it further as i'll get into trouble.

[Zachrulez]

Also yeah... what the hell? Subtle attack? What's SK on?

[Glork]

Also yeah... what the hell? Subtle attack? What's SK on?

Live I've already stated, he's got a bad case of the "gottaprotectscumbuddyNeto" syndrome.

[Bogre]

But then couldn't you argue that I should also be lynched by the same principle? I also didn't support the Neto bandwagon and I don't feel like I've contributed much. Why Gayle over me?

Also, Maemuki was on the Netlava wagon,

stayed

on the Netlava wagon, even while other people were switching over to Neto or Zach (including me, who had also been on the Netlava wagon with her). Also, my gut feeling says she's town.

@ Haylen: How do you know Yos can't be lynched. Who told you?

-> Not supporting the Neto bandwagon isn't scummy in of itself- I didn't support it, if you'll notice. I didn't support the Neto wagon because I he looked more town than others. I don't know for sure if he is, but I thought other lynches were better. Which was Gayle's position, except he seems to know Neto is town instead of just preferring to lynch someone scummier. The scumminess additionally comes from unwillingness to commit- he said he thought the Neto wagon would be a mislynch, but didn't state why, and didn't vote much.

What, exactly, has he contributed? Why do you think you haven't? There are about 4 players who fluffed a lot more than they've looked critically into things, can you guess which ones I think have?

So yes, my suspicion went down after I realized I had gotten the wrong impression, but it is still significant per the noncontribution and lack of commitment.

[SaintKerrigan]

Also yeah... what the hell? Subtle attack? What's SK on?

Ok, so you don't agree that Mae is pro-town. I probably shouldn't have used the word "subtle." The grammar Nazis can go ahead and lynch me now.

[Bogre]

I don't like Zach's subtle attack on arguably the most pro-town player in this game (Maemuki). At least the most pro-town player on the Netlava wagon (well, besides me, but I have to say that ).

Not subtle at all. I don't agree with your assessment of Mae.

If you attack a player, you generally don't think he/she/it is pro-town.

Unless you're scum, in which case, you do.

[Zachrulez]

Also yeah... what the hell? Subtle attack? What's SK on?

Ok, so you don't agree that Mae is pro-town. I probably shouldn't have used the word "subtle." The grammar Nazis can go ahead and lynch me now.

There's a world of difference between direct and subtle.

[Maemuki]

Unless you're scum, in which case, you do.

On that case, you pretend that you don't think he/she/it is pro-town.

What, exactly, has he contributed? Why do you think you haven't? There are about 4 players who fluffed a lot more than they've looked critically into things, can you guess which ones I think have?

you should include yourself on that list~

[Bogre]

Do you have ground for that statement, Maemuki?

Please explain, in -full- detail, why you think that's the case, I'd be interested to hear it.

[Maemuki]

Do you have ground for that statement, Maemuki?

I'll answer your question with a question: Have you done anything on this game? Do you have a single memorable post?

Oh, and by the way, I even forgot you were in the game. That's a pretty bad sign right there.

[Bogre]

Do you have ground for that statement, Maemuki?

I'll answer your question with a question: Have you done anything on this game? Do you have a single memorable post?

Oh, and by the way, I even forgot you were in the game. That's a pretty bad sign right there.

It is a bad sign, a sign of how little attention you're paying this game.

I find it strange you are unwilling to actually answer me.

For instance, things you probably should have gotten from my posts, if you were actively participating in this game:
1.) Stated I felt Neto's frustration with Elli showed townieness, and before that that he was doing nothing but talk theory.
2.) Voted for and pressured Zach over his own noncontribution
3.) Found Gayle unwilling to commit and scummy.
4.) (And this involves you) I referenced your claim to be a lurker as fighting against your meta. This is perhaps the strangest that you claim to 'not remember', since I was talking about you specifically and similar to what we're discussing now.

[Maemuki]

It is a bad sign, a sign of how little attention you're paying this game.

You have posted 24 times. On a 722 post game that moves on super-speed. I think my forgetfulness is justified.

4.) (And this involves you) I referenced your claim to be a lurker as fighting against your meta. This is perhaps the strangest that you claim to 'not remember', since I was talking about you specifically and similar to what we're discussing now.

Wait, you never said that! You said that it was a disclaimer against my meta! HOW IS THAT MEMORABLE, PEOPLE?

And no I don't remember any of the others without rereading.

[Bogre]

It is a bad sign, a sign of how little attention you're paying this game.

You have posted 24 times. On a 722 post game that moves on super-speed. I think my forgetfulness is justified.

Posts =/= contribution.

I've just reread the first 7 pages, and found about 2 sentences of questions to KMD that can be considered content. In about 12 posts.

So...yeah, fluff...yup.