Mini 214- *gasp* important event...it's over!

Someone · Post Post #25 (ISO) » Wed Jul 27, 2005 9:39 am

Vote Count

powered by The Count-Counter 2000

Nox - 3 (TonyMontana , Kerplunk , CoolBot )
NanookTheWolf - 2 (ibaesha , Freezing )
EnterYourNameHere - 2 (Dranko20 , chaotic_diablo )
CoolBot - 1 (NanookTheWolf )
Kerplunk - 1 (EnterYourNameHere )
chaotic_diablo - 1 (Nox )

Not voting (0): No one

6 to lynch.

Nox · Post Post #26 (ISO) » Thu Jul 28, 2005 1:43 am

Coolbot: I'm not saying that I don't want a bandwagon; all I was trying to say was that if we bandwagon an innocent for random reasons, Scum could very well jump on. I just don't like random bandwagons. I mean, if you're going to bandwagon someone, at least have the slightest suspicion for them.

CoolBot · Post Post #27 (ISO) » Thu Jul 28, 2005 5:39 am

Except in rare cases, the game stagnates without a random bandwagon. Scum try not to bring attention to themselves.

chaotic_diablo · Post Post #28 (ISO) » Thu Jul 28, 2005 6:12 am

Nox: in the case that we have no reason to bandwagon anyone, it would be better just to choose someone to bandwagon and see what happens. I hardly think the mafia will jump out and make an obvious mistake if nothing is happening.

unvote

Kerplunk · Post Post #29 (ISO) » Fri Jul 29, 2005 12:24 am

Okay guys, this game has to have some spirit else this can dragged forever.

I would like to ask the other players what your opinion is about the small bandwagon on Nox. Have you any other suspicions? It doesn't seem so, else you would have spoken up.

ibaesha · Post Post #30 (ISO) » Fri Jul 29, 2005 2:17 am

I haven't had much to say so far. I thought Nox was a bit over the top being concerned with two votes on a person since that doesn't necessarily constitute a bandwagon, but didn't consider the paranoia scummy per se. Without a few votes and pressure, there won't be anything to say and we'd just stagnate. I'd like to see where the pressure on Nox leads to at this point though.

ibaesha · Post Post #31 (ISO) » Fri Jul 29, 2005 2:17 am

I haven't had much to say so far. I thought Nox was a bit over the top being concerned with two votes on a person since that doesn't necessarily constitute a bandwagon, but didn't consider the paranoia scummy per se. Without a few votes and pressure, there won't be anything to say and we'd just stagnate. I'd like to see where the pressure on Nox leads to at this point though.

ibaesha · Post Post #32 (ISO) » Fri Jul 29, 2005 2:19 am

Argghh I have no idea why it doubleposted. Sorry.

Freezing · Post Post #33 (ISO) » Fri Jul 29, 2005 10:13 am

@ibaesha: Nice triple-post.

Unvote: NanookTheWolf

As for Nox, he seems slightly more suspicious than almost anyone else, but so far I just read him as an overzealous Townie.

Actually, the person who worries me the most is CoolBot. I mean, he just comes out of nowhere, asks why there isn't a bandwagon on Nox, then defends random bandwagoning.

That's it

. So, for now,

Vote: CoolBot

.

Nox · Post Post #34 (ISO) » Fri Jul 29, 2005 4:32 pm

Hey, Freezing? Nox is a "she".

ibaesha: Maybe its because I thought I was in my other game, which is a newbie. When its 4 to lynch, 2 votes is more worrying. I unno.

Nox · Post Post #35 (ISO) » Fri Jul 29, 2005 4:35 pm

Oh, and

Unvote

NanookTheWolf · Post Post #36 (ISO) » Sat Jul 30, 2005 7:32 am

Freezing .. Custom tag?

Nox wrote:Hey, Freezing? Nox is a "she".

ibaesha: Maybe its because I thought I was in my other game, which is a newbie. When its 4 to lynch, 2 votes is more worrying. I unno.

Maybe?

Unvote: Coolbot

and

Vote: Nox

Sorry Nox, but your defense on this issue isn't convincing me. You seem to be trying to make an excuse for everything, for something so miniscule. You just saying quite simply that you didn't mean to over react or something of the like wouldn't have worried me.

Dranko20 · Post Post #37 (ISO) » Sat Jul 30, 2005 8:08 am

Kerplunck wrote:I would like to ask the other players what your opinion is about the small bandwagon on Nox. Have you any other suspicions? It doesn't seem so, else you would have spoken up.

I think that people on this bandwagon because they haven't got another lead, It doesn't seem very sound to me and want to avoid it. I think Nox is just reacting like any protown would when getting piled on, i know it's pretty frustrating.

but I'm gonna

unvote, and Lurker Vote: TonyMontana

He's only posted a random vote, I think that's a better lead then this nox wagon.

Nox · Post Post #38 (ISO) » Sat Jul 30, 2005 12:10 pm

NanooktheWolf wrote:Sorry Nox, but your defense on this issue isn't convincing me. You seem to be trying to make an excuse for everything, for something so miniscule. You just saying quite simply that you didn't mean to over react or something of the like wouldn't have worried me.

Thing is nanook, there is no defense on this issue. So what, I was trying to vote someone for a reason other than "random vote". And yes, Im a big overreacter. And Im also big on analysing every single thing and thats just how I am. Im a nitpicker!

There's no excuses for it, looking back on it, I thought "Why would I have freaked on a simple 2nd votes anyways?" and started spitting out random hypothesis and its just the best explanation that I can offer. There's nothing more to it than that.

Dranko20 wrote: I think Nox is just reacting like any protown would when getting piled on, i know it's pretty frustrating.

Damn right it is.XD
Thank you.

NanookTheWolf · Post Post #39 (ISO) » Sat Jul 30, 2005 12:16 pm

Nox wrote:Thing is nanook, there is no defense on this issue. So what, I was trying to vote someone for a reason other than "random vote". And yes, Im a big overreacter. And Im also big on analysing every single thing and thats just how I am. Im a nitpicker!.

This is exactly the kind of thing I mean .. You mentioned earlier that you thought this game was a newbie setup .. and then you say that you are very big at being analytical. If you were really observant you would have noticed that this is a mini game. You are basically contradicting your words.

ibaesha · Post Post #40 (ISO) » Sat Jul 30, 2005 1:09 pm

Well, Nox hasn't done much to impress me. "That's just how I am." doesn't really cut it, but I'm not prepared to vote for her yet. However, I see no reason to keep my random vote so

unvote: Nanook

and

FOS: Nox

.

chaotic_diablo · Post Post #41 (ISO) » Sat Jul 30, 2005 1:41 pm

The "That's just how I am." thing reminds me of Peacebringer. Anyway, Nox already has 4 votes, so I'm not placing mine until I'm fully convinced.
Anyway, Nanook and Dranko make a point.

fos Nox and Tony

Nox · Post Post #42 (ISO) » Sat Jul 30, 2005 1:42 pm

NanookTheWolf wrote:
Nox wrote:Thing is nanook, there is no defense on this issue. So what, I was trying to vote someone for a reason other than "random vote". And yes, Im a big overreacter. And Im also big on analysing every single thing and thats just how I am. Im a nitpicker!.
This is exactly the kind of thing I mean .. You mentioned earlier that you thought this game was a newbie setup .. and then you say that you are very big at being analytical. If you were really observant you would have noticed that this is a mini game. You are basically contradicting your words.

Analytical and observant are not the same thing. XD

NanookTheWolf · Post Post #43 (ISO) » Sat Jul 30, 2005 1:57 pm

You're right .. Analytical is more in depth, so even so, you still contradicted yourself.

TonyMontana · Post Post #44 (ISO) » Sat Jul 30, 2005 6:47 pm

Apologies to Nox for assuming she was a guy

Anyway, Nanook and Dranko make a point.
fos Nox and Tony

The point of "Lurker voting" me? You just seem to back up the main bandwagon, and a side vote, while not bringing anything to the table.

chaotic_diablo · Post Post #45 (ISO) » Sat Jul 30, 2005 8:00 pm

TonyMontana wrote:Apologies to Nox for assuming she was a guy

Anyway, Nanook and Dranko make a point.
fos Nox and Tony
The point of "Lurker voting" me? You just seem to back up the main bandwagon, and a side vote, while not bringing anything to the table.

The point of lurker

fosing

is to tell you that your about to be in range of suspicion if you don't post something. Your not exactly helping youself by popping up and pinning the blame on someone else. You also proclaim yourself a hypocrite by not introducing anything new as well. As far as backing up the main and side voting, I have presented my opinion while you haven't. You completely ignore the current issue and instead, you target the next suspicious person. I call that a typical lurker strategy.

vote TonyMontana

TonyMontana · Post Post #46 (ISO) » Sat Jul 30, 2005 8:48 pm

I brought something to the table by calling your actions suspicious.

You talk alot of smack with no substance. How have you presented an opinion in a matter greater than I? What current issue am I ignoring? I target the next suspicious person? I didn't even fos you, I haven't targeted anybody else than Nox, I didn't even FOS you, so way to jump the gun.
I merely called you out on fosing me with no reason whatsoever.

Nox · Post Post #47 (ISO) » Sun Jul 31, 2005 1:43 am

NanooktheWolf wrote:You're right .. Analytical is more in depth, so even so, you still contradicted yourself.

Bah. I'm a bit distracted, I'll admit.

TonyMontana wrote:Apologies to Nox for assuming she was a guy

Tsok, hehehe. I get that alot.

EnterYourNameHere · Post Post #48 (ISO) » Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:13 pm

Unvote Kerplunk

, no reason to leave that on.

Vote chaotic_diablo

. Seems to me like he's just trying to jump on the lurker bandwagon. Nox and Tony don't seem particularly scummy to me, so this will do for now.

chaotic_diablo · Post Post #49 (ISO) » Sun Jul 31, 2005 4:45 pm

TonyMontana wrote:I brought something to the table by calling your actions suspicious.

You talk alot of smack with no substance. How have you presented an opinion in a matter greater than I? What current issue am I ignoring? I target the next suspicious person? I didn't even fos you, I haven't targeted anybody else than Nox, I didn't even FOS you, so way to jump the gun.
I merely called you out on fosing me with no reason whatsoever.

Calling my suspicions IS targeting me.
Opinion? Your opinion consists of drawing suspicion on the person who "fosed" you while mine was indifferent up until you starting posting after your vote.
Current issue? You were first to vote Nox, you presented no opinion other than she "sticks out". After a while, you could have at least presented your opinion on why you stuck with your vote. Instead, you ignore all the points and posts made between your vote and your next post. I don't believe that you catching me happening to fos you is a coincidence. That is lurking.
I merely fosed you because of Dranko's point. Your response was pretty negative.