Open 189~Trouble@Warren State Mental Hosp (Over)

BloodCovenent · Post Post #650 (ISO) » Tue Jan 19, 2010 5:58 pm

Um, Vi, yea i can talk about otto's claim, the other game is over however it will have to wait until tomorrow. Classes started this week and i have been a little overwhelmed. I will get to this game after classes and lunch tomorrow.

VP Baltar · Post Post #651 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2010 6:22 am

Unvote, Vote: BloodCovenent

BloodCovenent · Post Post #652 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2010 9:07 am

VP Baltar wrote:
BloodCovenant wrote:I can agree with this to an extent. His questions are boring, bland, they don't have much content. What I mean by that is, they don't really make the questioned think too much, they don't pressure anyone hard. I guess i would call it, feign questioning?
That's pretty cool. What happened to your gut townread on Howard from yesterday?

Your biggest posts so far in the game were arguing with me not to lynch Howard, so what changed?

Also, what were you hoping to get out of "pressuring" Xdaamno? What is your read on him?

My opinions changed. I felt that his question or weak scum-hunting was to try and appear town. He had to ask everyone (iirc) a question, and most of them were either similar or easy to use someone else answer. If it were me, i wouldn't have focused on question everyone, rather my top scum-picks.

If you think that i'm scummy for "derailing" his wagon yesturday, and now being enthusiastic of it today, you are wrong, and your reasoning is bad. If I were scum trying to lynch him, why would I have waited today when I could have just jumped on his wagon yesturday. That would have been much more efficient for scum-blood.

The pressuring of Xdaamno was exactly that. there wasn't any real intention of a lynch. My read is neutral, leaning town.

Vi wrote:
BloodCovenent - You said that you didn't like Otto's claim a while ago. Can you talk about that yet?

Ok, Otto was in Killers Mafia II with me as well, the game is over so good. He breadcrumbed in the exact same way that he did in this one, i can pull the post if you would like. I wouldn't mind doing it , just on slight time restraints. He crumbed Vanilla. We all were pissed at him, and was glad that he replaced. We actually didn't discuss his claim really... at all. we just played the game. IIRC he was replaced by a semi-scummy looking player which we almost lynched, but the game dragged on and had 4 deadline extensions so we didn't really remember otto's claim very well. His character was NK'd N1, and it was indeed vanilla. So, he claim may very well be valid, however i wouldn't say his role is confirmed until we get results.
--Which, IMO is sketchy because Prozac wasn't killed, and he didn't put effort into getting a result.

tubby216 · Post Post #653 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:20 pm

**************************modnotes*******************

slysly replaces populartajo effective now

SlySly · Post Post #654 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:21 pm

howdy guys, reading up!

VP Baltar · Post Post #655 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:45 pm

Hey SlySly! Long time no see.

@BC-I'm implying that I could see you as HR's scumbuddy, not that he's town and you're scum.

Evidence is in this weak reasoning from changing a town read to a scum read:

BC wrote:My opinions changed. I felt that his question or weak scum-hunting was to try and appear town. He had to ask everyone (iirc) a question, and most of them were either similar or easy to use someone else answer. If it were me, i wouldn't have focused on question everyone, rather my top scum-picks.

BC wrote:The pressuring of Xdaamno was exactly that. there wasn't any real intention of a lynch. My read is neutral, leaning town.

You didn't answer my question. What were you hoping to get our of pressuring him? I realize there was no intention to lynch...that's what pressure voting is.

Also, why were you pressuring a town read?

Vi · Post Post #656 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2010 3:33 pm

BloodCovenent - So your reason for doubting sabrewolf's claim is because you don't like sabrewolf? That doesn't make sense.

Sotty7 · Post Post #657 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2010 3:35 pm

BloodCovenent Post 652 wrote:The pressuring of Xdaamno was exactly that. there wasn't any real intention of a lynch. My read is neutral, leaning town.

This sounds like bullshit to me. You threw a vote on him right after Vi with no explanation, looks like you were trying to be an early vote on his wagon. N ow you want to say you are leaning town on him? Not buying it.

SlySly · Post Post #658 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2010 8:12 pm

Xdaamno wrote:
saberwolf wrote:
Xdaamno wrote:
saberwolf wrote:
Xdaamno wrote:Those replies went worse and worse. Otto deserves an extra vote.

Vote: Otto
Prove it, don't just post and hope people believe you.

What are you gonna do, cheat and find out my role?

????

I'm asking you to show HOW they are worse and worse, not just say they are.

I didn't realise your account wasn't in this game.
That post was because:

- I heard you were a cheater
-
It sounded like you were double accounting here

Unvote

in case my predecessor has a vote out that I have not gotten to yet.

If you thought saber was double accounting and was going to cheat to find out your role, you have to be scum. If you are town, saber would have to be double accounting and be the mod to know your role. Since you are scum, you thought your scum buddy is saber's alt.

This is enough for me to

Vote:Xdaamno

.

I can't believe that the mafia elite in this game didn't jump on this already. I am through 21 pages so far, I will read the rest tomorrow. I have other suspicions than X, but this slip should not be excused.

------------

Izzy, are you DGB's alt?

Also, Izzy, zwet is a terrible player who should be permanently banned from the site. He will never play in a game that I am modding.

tubby216 · Post Post #659 (ISO) » Thu Jan 21, 2010 2:18 am

*******************mod notes*********************

rosso replaces cay effective now

and with that we are full agian,

vote count coming later today.

Rosso Carne · Post Post #660 (ISO) » Thu Jan 21, 2010 2:19 am

Is anyone L-1?

DizzyIzzyB13 · Post Post #661 (ISO) » Thu Jan 21, 2010 4:24 am

SlySly wrote: Izzy, are you DGB's alt?

Also, Izzy, zwet is a terrible player who should be permanently banned from the site. He will never play in a game that I am modding.

No. And I'm sorry you're so wrong about zwet.

DizzyIzzyB13 · Post Post #662 (ISO) » Thu Jan 21, 2010 4:25 am

SlySly wrote: Izzy, are you DGB's alt?

Also, Izzy, zwet is a terrible player who should be permanently banned from the site. He will never play in a game that I am modding.

No. And I'm sorry you're so wrong about zwet.

DizzyIzzyB13 · Post Post #663 (ISO) » Thu Jan 21, 2010 4:25 am

SlySly wrote: Izzy, are you DGB's alt?

Also, Izzy, zwet is a terrible player who should be permanently banned from the site. He will never play in a game that I am modding.

No. And I'm sorry you're so wrong about zwet.

SlySly · Post Post #664 (ISO) » Thu Jan 21, 2010 4:56 am

DizzyIzzyB13 wrote: No. And I'm sorry you're so wrong about zwet.

No, I am so right. I will not elaborate at this point, but I will soon.

Sotty7 · Post Post #665 (ISO) » Thu Jan 21, 2010 6:25 am

SlySly Post 664 wrote:
DizzyIzzyB13 wrote: No. And I'm sorry you're so wrong about zwet.
No, I am so right. I will not elaborate at this point, but I will soon.

What does talking about Zwet as a player have anything to do with

this

game?

SlySly · Post Post #666 (ISO) » Thu Jan 21, 2010 8:24 am

Sotty7 wrote:
SlySly Post 664 wrote:
DizzyIzzyB13 wrote: No. And I'm sorry you're so wrong about zwet.
No, I am so right. I will not elaborate at this point, but I will soon.
What does talking about Zwet as a player have anything to do with
this
game?

Izzy made a statement about him. I merely responded. I have no plans of furthering the discussion about said player. I will elaborate on that subject at a more appropriate time in a more appropriate place.

VP Baltar · Post Post #667 (ISO) » Thu Jan 21, 2010 8:54 am

Did you finish reading the rest of the game Sly? I'd like to hear who some of your suspects beyond Xdaamno are and why.

Vi · Post Post #668 (ISO) » Thu Jan 21, 2010 3:26 pm

Rosso Carne 660 wrote:Is anyone L-1?

You are. ^_^

I'm still voting for Izzy, which is pretty nice.

SlySly · Post Post #669 (ISO) » Thu Jan 21, 2010 6:15 pm

Porochaz's "forgot" story is total BS.

HowardRoark · Post Post #670 (ISO) » Thu Jan 21, 2010 10:27 pm

@Vi: Memory fail. He was the second vote; I thought he was later.

@BloodCovenent: So he breadcrumbed accurately in another game, but you find this one suspicious?

tubby216 · Post Post #671 (ISO) » Fri Jan 22, 2010 2:25 am

**************** vote count****************

Howard Roark

~(3) L-3,xdaamno,scotty7,Blood Covenent

xdaamno

~ (2) L-4, Howard Roark,slysly

Dizzy Izzy

~ (1) L-5,Vi

VP Balter

~(1) L-5, Izzy

blood covenent

~(1) L-5 VP Balter

not voting

porochaz,rosso,

prodding porchaz,xdaamno

with 10 alive it will take 6 to lynch
you have 20 days till dealin

VP Baltar · Post Post #672 (ISO) » Fri Jan 22, 2010 2:52 am

Izzy, what are your thoughts on BC?

Vi, do you think Izzy is more likely to be scum than BC or Howard?

Howard, why are you so inactive in this game when you have proven that you are capable of being an active player?

Sly, is your post 669 intended to be a reply to my preceeding question?

Vi · Post Post #673 (ISO) » Fri Jan 22, 2010 3:17 am

VP Baltar 672 wrote:Vi, do you think Izzy is more likely to be scum than BC or Howard?

do you not agree that izzy is scum

tbh I don't think anything I say will get through to her, so :\

Unvote: DizzyIzzyB13
Vote: BloodCovenent

(L-4)

Rosso Carne · Post Post #674 (ISO) » Fri Jan 22, 2010 3:40 am

Vi wrote:
Rosso Carne 660 wrote:Is anyone L-1?
You are. ^_^

I'm still voting for Izzy, which is pretty nice.

liar