The "first post of page 6" Vote Count:
With
Deadline is 6:00 AM UTC, Monday, Feb 15. This is in precisely 12 days.
I explained in my first post, he kept trying to get out of the discussion phase and go back into the RVS, and he was obviously rolefishing with DJC. He started a BW on him, asked for a claim, got called on it, than tried to go back to the RVS.charter wrote:Can't say I understand what dana has done that is scummier than NS. Can someone enlighten me please.
Apparently that's all you did. I have already been asked about the RVS thing. I find it suspicious when people want to leave it too soon.Alright, just did a quick read, some thoughts as I read so far:
Darkstrike, DeeJayCee, Haschel Cedricson, and Nicodemus are possibly town.
Dana - Why did you want to stick with the RVS for so long? The purpose of this is to start discussion, and there was certaintly plenty of discussion going on. I can't see any reasons why a pro-town player would want to extend the RVS longer than required. You also asked for a claim on DJC WAAAY to early, and you've been generally flip-floppy throughout the game.
Exactly what I was going to say.I explained in my first post, he kept trying to get out of the discussion phase and go back into the RVS, and he was obviously rolefishing with DJC. He started a BW on him, asked for a claim, got called on it, than tried to go back to the RVS.
That's an illogical suspicion though... and "too soon" differs from person to person and game to game... in a 12p game, most would agree that by mid or end page two the RVS should be over.
Very simple: I had some suspicions, was waiting for other folk to post to get more data (and potentially more/deeper suspicions), and got pressured into talking about my suspicions. You're making more of this than is there.charter wrote:Glad to see some more votes on NS. I'm eagerly awaiting his explanation to why it took him so long to talk about someone, especially since that was the scummiest thing he's ever seen.
The part where he talks about not having a scummiest player despite having scummy players screams of scum. If you think certain players are scummy, why don't you post those players? We can't read your mind, you know. It sounds like he's trying to avoid making an opinion about anyone.Nobody Special wrote:I have some half-formed opinions on some people; I never said I didn't findcharter wrote:NobodySpecial, what opinions have you formed then? I don't really get how you can have opinions on people but don't find anyone scummy, please explain.anyonescummy, only that I don't have ascummiestplayer yet.
Honestly, why are you and Kmd trying to misrepresent me so blatantly?
1) Those, with the possible exception of the third reason, are all genuine reasons for building up a pressure bandwagon to force out some info.Nobody Special wrote:This just sticks out as one of the scummiest things I've seen in a mafia gamedanakillsu wrote:Yep.vote:DJCfor three reasons.
1)His vote for Flareonage for self-preservation
2)His nervousness
3)I want to see him claimever.
If you have suspicions, you say them, you don't ask other people to contribute and not contribute anything yourself. That's just bad behavior.Nobody Special wrote:Very simple: I had some suspicions, was waiting for other folk to post to get more data (and potentially more/deeper suspicions), and got pressured into talking about my suspicions. You're making more of this than is there.charter wrote:Glad to see some more votes on NS. I'm eagerly awaiting his explanation to why it took him so long to talk about someone, especially since that was the scummiest thing he's ever seen.
danakillsu 42 wrote:Yep.vote:DJCfor three reasons.
1)His vote for Flareonage for self-preservation
2)His nervousness
3)I want to see him claim
Nobody Special 86 wrote:There is no single player that stands out (yet) as scummiest to me; that's why I'm not voting. I hope to ferret out some scummitude soonest.
Nobody Special 98 wrote:I have some half-formed opinions on some people; I never said I didn't findcharter wrote:NobodySpecial, what opinions have you formed then? I don't really get how you can have opinions on people but don't find anyone scummy, please explain.anyonescummy, only that I don't have ascummiestplayer yet.
This story changing is pretty much a claim of scum from NS. What is the hold up with his lynch? This is a really clear cut scum lynch guys.Nobody Special 107 wrote:This just sticks out as one of the scummiest things I've seen in a mafia gamedanakillsu wrote:Yep.vote:DJCfor three reasons.
1)His vote for Flareonage for self-preservation
2)His nervousness
3)I want to see him claimever.
Does anybody else see this as potentially coaching a partner?@Danakillsu, aren't you the least bit apprehensive about being modkilled for talking about an ongoing game? Also, you don't seem to be doing any favors for yourself going on about daytalking scum.
So are you saying that you might have some worries with putting him at L-1, or hammering? I don't really see why you felt the need to say that you had no worries voting for him specifically at L-2.kyle99 wrote:Oh, lol, sorry. Midnight fails.Nicodemus wrote:Why not, exactly?kyle99 wrote:I have no worries with putting NS at L2.
I don't really have any worries with putting him at L2 because I think he's a scummy player, which I already outlined my reasons for.