tatetothetot wrote:For starters, I don't like Yos' post. Most of that is fairly standard stuff and doesn't seem necessary to post.
If you're in an unconventional game with unusual rules, the first thing you want to do is to figure out the correct stratagy. What out of that post I made was "standard stuff" that you already knew? Because that was stuff I all had to figure out myself as I made that post, read the rules, and tried to figure out their implications.
I can only assume it was done because he wanted to seem more pro town to gain votes.
And this is really terrible, especally since the POINT of my post was that NO ONE should be given too many votes at this point, including me.
Not something I can go off of right now, but I will not be voting for Yos to receive the double vote.
(shrug) This whole post of yours seems like a blatent attempt to plant paranoia in people's minds here, and I don't trust it.
I don't know very many people on the player list but for those of you who do know, please don't go off meta. If anything, a good player is not who should receive the vote because a good scum player with a double vote does not balance out a good town player with a double vote, imo.
So, what? Your theory is that it's better to give the double vote to a "bad" player? You do realize that a bad player with a double vote, even if they're town, is likely to make a serious "Opps, was that a hammer" type mistake, right?
I want us to win just for Yos' inevitable rant alone. -CrashTextDummie