Open 203: C/9 Mafia Wins!
-
-
kunkstar7 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2186
- Joined: November 29, 2009
- Location: The Void.
Actually no. Post 115 was to clarify from the1fifi his overall standing on the wagon he was joining. If I had taken his preceding post without any other context, I would vote him on that alone, seeing as it looks like bandwagonning just for the hell of it, without any backup reason. Even taking it in context, it looks like he just saw Max make a case on you, said, "yea that'll do fine", and proceeded to join your wagon at an opportune time without adding any reasoning of his own.
Vote Count-Sho
Scott-tatetothetot,
Lowell-Wdjat, gameplayah
Lowell-the1fifi
Max-Gayle, kyle99, Jacob Savage
Jacob Savage-danakillsu
danakillsu-wdjat, Gheb
Kunkstar-LowellWelcome to the Network.-
-
tatetothetot Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 146
- Joined: November 2, 2009
This game is ridiculous.
RVS is an important part of any game. Yes it is intended to be used to joke around and get some laughs but it also gets people introduced and can lead into conversation/debates. For instance, this thread was the debate on if RVS is a needed part of the game or if it is pointless or not.
So far, I am liking Max. I am not saying that he is town but his posts definitely keep the game going and start new discussions. What I dislike is people reactions to his posts. He asks pointless questions to keep people active and prods people who post for more information. Lurkers don't like this tactic and tend to disagree and vote for him thus what Lowell and Kyle did.
I would be joining the Lowell wagon until I realized who was on it. Now that Lowell is being put in the spot light, people are changing their minds and voting for him based off of fear to keep attention of themselves.
Gayles post do not scare me as he posts the same way in another game I am in with him.
I love this. You ask the lurkers and people who are just not participating who they think needs to pick up activity.@ Tatetothetot + All Others
Has the game advanced at a pace you are happy with? If not why not?
Which player has generated the most attention in your opinion? Is that rightfully so?
Who has remained under the radar? Should they have?
Is there a player who needs to pick up activity? Who?
subtle much?
Wdjat is probably the person who I would like to lynch today. His posts are generally not helpful in the beginning but his recent head butting with Dana give me the feeling of scum on town. I feel a Wdjat lynch would reveal the most at this time.And that's the way the cookie crumbles.-
-
Gheb Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: January 30, 2010
Don't think it's smart to lynch one of the more vocal / helpful players - yeah, I consider Wdjat pretty helpful at this point. Would rather get rid of blatantly unhelpful people.
Only problem with that imo is that many ppl have been fairly unhelpful. I don't remember decent input from a lot of people and I think it wouldn't be the worst idea to pressure people relucant to give info.
Can also deal with a Lowell wagon for feigning activity though I think other ppl are guilty of this themselves.-
-
Lowell Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6318
- Joined: July 25, 2006
-
-
kunkstar7 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2186
- Joined: November 29, 2009
- Location: The Void.
What is this supposed to mean really? Your wording implies a guiltiness and escaping from judgement. Also considering yourself unlynchable is way overconfident. If you exhibit scummy tendencies then you will be lynched. This whole confidence that you can sneak by any lynch is horrible.Lowell wrote:@tate- no worries. people always go after me when they're scared and don't know what else to do. I wouldn't worry about it, though, I'm good at weaseling my way out. I'm de facto unlynchable.
vote: lowellWelcome to the Network.-
-
Lowell Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6318
- Joined: July 25, 2006
-
-
The1fifi Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: January 30, 2010
- Location: Corrupt Portugal
-
-
kyle99 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1106
- Joined: November 22, 2009
- Location: Spokane, WA
-
-
Gayle Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: November 2, 2009
What has Lowell done that you find scummy?tatetothetot wrote:I would be joining the Lowell wagon...
You mean gameplayah and Fifi? Why do you think either of them are voting Lowell "based off of fear to keep attention of themselves"? Not that I believe Fifi has any reason for his vote whatsoever.tate wrote: ...until I realized who was on it.Now that Lowell is being put in the spot light, people are changing their minds and voting for him based off of fear to keep attention of themselves
And speaking of the Lowell votes, why is no one questioning the Lowell wagon? Every single vote on it is complete nonsense.
@Fifi:You want to wagon him based on gut and because the game is slow?What?Are you saying you are willing to lynch him over nothing?
...what? This post is 100% scum manufactured nonsense. You are making a gigantic deal out of absolutely nothing and using it to jump on a completely ridiculous wagon.The Kunk wrote:What is this supposed to mean really? Your wording implies a guiltiness and escaping from judgement. Also considering yourself unlynchable is way overconfident. If you exhibit scummy tendencies then you will be lynched. This whole confidence that you can sneak by any lynch is horrible.
Vote: Kunkstar7
ButKyle wrote:Defeatism never works. I honestly think that Lowell is acting scummier than Max atm, so I'm going to unvote, vote: Lowellwhydo you find him scummy?
Also, in an attempt to impress Master Sho:Inaccurate Vote Count wrote:Max(1) - JacobSavage
Lowell(4) - gameplayah The1fifi kunkstar7 kyle99
JacobSavage(1) - danakillsu
danakillsu(2) - Wdjat Gheb
kunkstar7(3) - tatetothetot Lowell Gayle
Not Voting (1) - Max-
-
kyle99 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1106
- Joined: November 22, 2009
- Location: Spokane, WA
-
-
tatetothetot Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 146
- Joined: November 2, 2009
Actually, I was referring to Kyle and Krunk about hidding behind Lowells wagon.Gayle wrote:
What has Lowell done that you find scummy?tatetothetot wrote:I would be joining the Lowell wagon...
You mean gameplayah and Fifi? Why do you think either of them are voting Lowell "based off of fear to keep attention of themselves"? Not that I believe Fifi has any reason for his vote whatsoever.tate wrote: ...until I realized who was on it.Now that Lowell is being put in the spot light, people are changing their minds and voting for him based off of fear to keep attention of themselves
What has Lowell done that is town? All of his posts are short and pointless and generally he avoids questions that are directed at him. I don't recall ever seeing a straight answer from him.
Vote: WdjatAnd that's the way the cookie crumbles.-
-
Gayle Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: November 2, 2009
tate wrote:Actually, I was referring toKyle and Krunkabout hidding behind Lowells wagon.tate @ Sat Feb 20, 2010 5:16 pm wrote:I would be joining the Lowell wagon until I realized who was on it.Now that Lowell is being put in the spot light, people are changing their minds and voting for him based off of fear to keep attention of themselves.kunk @ Sat Feb 20, 2010 7:45 pm wrote:What is this supposed to mean really? Your wording implies a guiltiness and escaping from judgement. Also considering yourself unlynchable is way overconfident. If you exhibit scummy tendencies then you will be lynched. This whole confidence that you can sneak by any lynch is horrible.
vote: lowell
Shenanigans.kyle @ Sat Feb 20, 2010 10:08 pm wrote:Defeatism never works. I honestly think that Lowell is acting scummier than Max atm, so I'm going to unvote, vote: Lowell
Also, why are you voting Wdjat?-
-
The1fifi Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: January 30, 2010
- Location: Corrupt Portugal
I'd be happy with a no lynch to ofc. But i never done a no lynch, and what i heard from more experienced players is that it never is beneficial in d1@Fifi: You want to wagon him based on gut and because the game is slow? What? Are you saying you are willing to lynch him over nothing?Matteh says :
Also, the wiki is only a REFERENCE point. Don't live by what it says-
-
Gheb Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: January 30, 2010
-
-
Gayle Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: November 2, 2009
-
-
The1fifi Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: January 30, 2010
- Location: Corrupt Portugal
... Over a myslinch -.-Gayle wrote:
Why in the world would you be happy with a no lynch?The1fifi wrote:I'd be happy with a no lynch to ofc. But i never done a no lynch, and what i heard from more experienced players is that it never is beneficial in d1Matteh says :
Also, the wiki is only a REFERENCE point. Don't live by what it says-
-
Gayle Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: November 2, 2009
-
-
The1fifi Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: January 30, 2010
- Location: Corrupt Portugal
-
-
Gayle Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: November 2, 2009
Okay, we have gotten a bit off track here.The1fifi wrote:Because.. i.. don't..want.. to.. kill.. townies. -.-
Are you willing to lynch Lowell?
Are you saying that an alternative to lynching Lowell is a no lynch?
Are you saying that you would rather no lynch, than attempt to lynch in our current situation?-
-
The1fifi Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: January 30, 2010
- Location: Corrupt Portugal
-
-
Gayle Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: November 2, 2009
-
-
The1fifi Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: January 30, 2010
- Location: Corrupt Portugal
-
-
Lowell Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6318
- Joined: July 25, 2006
-
-
Gheb Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: January 30, 2010
-
-
Wdjat Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 167
- Joined: January 7, 2010
What about Gayle's vote? Do you think the motivation behind these votes was playstyle disagreement or do you think there's scum in those votes?tatetothetot wrote:So far, I am liking Max. I am not saying that he is town but his posts definitely keep the game going and start new discussions. What I dislike is people reactions to his posts. He asks pointless questions to keep people active and prods people who post for more information. Lurkers don't like this tactic and tend to disagree and vote for him thus what Lowell and Kyle did.
At the time you posted this, I think The1fifi was the only person voting Lowell. What's your read on him?tatetothetot wrote:I would be joining the Lowell wagon until I realized who was on it. Now that Lowell is being put in the spot light, people are changing their minds and voting for him based off of fear to keep attention of themselves.
Are you seriously trying to buddy up to Max for being passive aggressive?tatetothetot wrote:
I love this. You ask the lurkers and people who are just not participating who they think needs to pick up activity.@ Tatetothetot + All Others
Has the game advanced at a pace you are happy with? If not why not?
Which player has generated the most attention in your opinion? Is that rightfully so?
Who has remained under the radar? Should they have?
Is there a player who needs to pick up activity? Who?
subtle much?
What do you think my death would reveal if I came up scum? What if I came up town?tatetothetot wrote:Wdjat is probably the person who I would like to lynch today. His posts are generally not helpful in the beginning but his recent head butting with Dana give me the feeling of scum on town. I feel a Wdjat lynch would reveal the most at this time.mecha shiva! mecha shiva!
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.