?I didn't find it inherently scummy until recently
Recently with respect to when? and why did your view change?
?I didn't find it inherently scummy until recently
So that's a frustration vote stemming from my first vote starting a wagon? If so, you should take into consideration that I didn't know people would follow my lead on it. I didn't intentionally start a wagon, it just formed. I don't think it's bad to suspect the mod being a character in the game in a game like this.NavyCherub wrote:Oh, and unvote, vote: Leech for starting the whole thing.
so your issue is that its still around, but you suspect the person who started it? not the people who came later, prolonging it?NavyCherub wrote:When the talk didn't stop. When it started growing ("it is still a major idea...")magnus_orion wrote:Recently with respect to when? and why did your view change?
Oh, andunvote,vote: Leechfor starting the whole thing.
I've never played with you unless you're an alt (blatantly obvious at this point). Mind telling us who you actually are. Also, you're gonna have to elaborate considerably on this point for it to have any credibility.Last, Kai is scum based upon personal impression of him during previous games.
The attitude is irritating.*blink*
Why?
1. Tar's statement that his role may hinge on the mod leads me to believe that the mod is in the game.We need to figure out if
1. UK is "in" the game
2. If she is acting as a player, or if her being lynched has some affect on the game instead
^^Scum^^Col.Cathart wrote:*head explodes*
I have completely no idea what to think of anyone in this game so far. Going to get some sleep, then time for school. After that, I'll do a re-read and hopefully find something interesting to finally start the game on my part... -_-
I haven't seen a reason to change it. I could unvote, but that's a pointless procedure unless your vote is on someone that is in danger of being lynched, that you don't think should be. If I see a reason to change my vote, I will.Ok, but you still have your vote there. What's with that?
How is it scummy to bring up a topic for discussion? How is the "first post" specification you made relevant at all? It obviously started discussion, and brought forth a subject that we should be thinking about in this type of game.He was the first one to bring it up, with his first post as well.
I'll put this bluntly.NavyCherub wrote:Ok, but you still have your vote there. What's with that?
He was the first one to bring it up, with his first post as well.o your issue is that its still around, but you suspect the person who started it? not the people who came later, prolonging it?
Yes, you're right, it's not.Leech wrote:How is it scummy to bring up a topic for discussion? How is the "first post" specification you made relevant at all? It obviously started discussion, and brought forth a subject that we should be thinking about in this type of game.
I mostly did it for reaction purposes. If I had voted because I was pressured I would have done it right away.magnus_orion wrote:I'm sort of getting the feeling you just made this vote because people were pressuring you about not voting. Can you dissuade me from this feeling?
first, caving in to pressure and trying to be appeasingNavyCherub wrote:Yes, you're right, it's not.Leech wrote:How is it scummy to bring up a topic for discussion? How is the "first post" specification you made relevant at all? It obviously started discussion, and brought forth a subject that we should be thinking about in this type of game.Unvote.
I mostly did it for reaction purposes. If I had voted because I was pressured I would have done it right away.magnus_orion wrote:I'm sort of getting the feeling you just made this vote because people were pressuring you about not voting. Can you dissuade me from this feeling?