I should probably do the same for papers, come to think of it... so
Wait, is NavyCherub *seriously* trying to get away with the "reaction testing" argument? That's been a giant scumtell for at least a year now.NavyCherub wrote:Yes, you're right, it's not.Leech wrote:How is it scummy to bring up a topic for discussion? How is the "first post" specification you made relevant at all? It obviously started discussion, and brought forth a subject that we should be thinking about in this type of game.Unvote.
magnus_orion wrote:I'm sort of getting the feeling you just made this vote because people were pressuring you about not voting. Can you dissuade me from this feeling?I mostly did it for reaction purposes.If I had voted because I was pressured I would have done it right away.
Wait, so you're voting Leech for... a random vote? Care to explain?NavyCherub wrote:I'll elaborate then. The first vote was scummy to me because it started it the whole thing (no way) and didn't say much other than that the mod might be a character. No indication of if the mod was a character we should be wary of, etc., just that there might be a Mod character. Leech then didn't bring it up again until I voted him for it. I was thinking he did this in order to draw attention away from his connection to the votes, so I voted. We had some exchanges on the topic, I do not find the idea of the Mod being a negative character a scummy thing anymore. I still don't think we should lynch her TODAY, though.