Not voting (3):
Need six.
You can see how that would appear scummy though, right?Astro wrote: unvoted DP because my initial vote was totally random, and added a silly comment about there now no longer being a bandwagon against him.
If making bad jokes is scummy, I'm probably scummier than most people around here. I don't agree that retracting random votes is scummy.halfpint wrote:You can see how that would appear scummy though, right?Astro wrote: unvoted DP because my initial vote was totally random, and added a silly comment about there now no longer being a bandwagon against him.
I didn't like the way he justified his random vote. You'd think a townie will put a bit more thought into who we lynch, while inHim in post #25 says he's happy lynching pretty much anyone. I've got nothing more on him.halfpint wrote: As for Astro, I can't seem to figure the reason for the cryptic vote of inhim. What is it about post #25? Can you elaborate a bit more?
Phoebus wrote:By the definition of a group, it's got to be two or more people interacting.Several as in two and scum group as in a mafia or a lone SK.
Please tell me it was the language barrier.
Boy, did I have to dig deep to find that quote. But yes, I see now that a group should be more than one person.State of Michigan, Department of Consumer & Industry Services, Office of Financial and Insurance Services wrote: This coverage was
through aone-person groupbecause the Petitioner was the only person eligible for health
insurance.
First you random voted Johnny (well, I'm assuming it was random), in [25] you say that your (random) vote is as good as any other. In my opinion, there are votes that are better than the random ones. Not much to base a suspicion upon, I agree, but it's something. I think my current vote is better than my previous random one.inHimshallibe wrote:How does my post [25] implicate that I'm "happy lynching pretty much anyone"? I don't understand.
Uh, OK...WindSlicer wrote:DP did not get my vote because he was suspicious, if you read my post maybe you'd understand. Before you ask me to talk, I prompt you to read.
I'm not entirely sure - is that intended as a baseless random vote, an OMGUS vote, or a gesture to DP? In any case, thanks for clearing up that you're not voting DP because you're suspicious of him.WindSlicer wrote:Ok There's not much to go on as it is just the first day and no one's realy done anything interesting, so since you gave me the idea...Dragon Phoenix wrote:WindSlicer wrote:Yeah, I passed by yesterday, but wasn't really sure if it was fine to just say Hi or whatever. But, yeah I'm here, reading and watching.Unvote SeolRead, watch, post and vote, please, or we'll nail you as lurker scum.
Vote WindSlicer
Vote Dragon Phoenix