rewq455 wrote:animorpherv1 wrote:I saw Magua on earlier today.
He's lurking.
Magua seems to tend to post walls... he may be building his next one
Indeed. Also, a little miffed over being prodded when I posted yesterday. And then even more miffed to have Animorph call that lurking. That being said, though:
Animorph gaining an insanity for having no night action seems wrong to me, but it's mod confirmed, so I'll deal.
The robbing grave point is to cut down on murderers murdering -- the cult can still ritual even if only 1/3 of its members get actions, and the cult can spread the graves around. It is theoretically possible to lock the cult down if we choose all the grave robbers to be cultists, but then we have 3-5 attempted murders tonight. Not a good trade.
The goal should be to lynch the cult during the day, and keep the murderers from murdering at night. This is part of the reasoning why I'm more open to keeping claimed murderers (who may or may not still be town) alive. The only trick is confirming that they're not cult.
Want to take a moment to respond to elvis_knit's #1495:
elvis_knits wrote:This is what is now making me wonder about Magua... because Magua was Amished who voted Evilsnail for voting Nico. And Magua was the one who brought up that this change-your-choice-of-insanity thing is possible because it happened in SA1. AND Magua was cult in SA1. I think he was the last alive. So he knows his shit.
So... yesterday I really liked a lot about of what Magua was saying. I thought he was like superTownTM. But this new Drench-AMished-Nico connection has me a little scared that Magua could totally be pulling the strings in a bid to save kunkstar.
I do know my shit. Allow me to respond by pointing out my suspicion of drench-as-scum throughout d2, or my kunkstar-should-rob-grave nomination at the beginning of d3. I didn't bring up the change of insanity, I just pointed out it happened before. I'm still undecided on kunkstar's murderer-status, and I still want her to rob graves. This is, I should note, the exact same tack I'm taking with Ellibereth.
Side note: I've already railed against why taking Taboo: Launder is a big red flag that says "I'm a murderer," and why town should not take this thing. Ever. Town does not want to give out excuses for being bloody.
But begin the wall:
VP Baltar: Good thinking, good posts, odd vote on kunkstar, which a number of people called him on, but backs it up well. Town.
elvis_knits: Paranoid, perhaps, but I treat paranoia as a towntell. Lean town.
rewq: Post #1461 rubs me the wrong way. Seems fluffy and wishy-washy -- adds nothing new to the conversation. Post #1456 makes no sense in a game where scum can daytalk...but then, that would indicate that its a towntell. Overall, I tend towards aggressive town.
DrippingGoofball: Continues to post incredibly little content, and to bandwagon on whomever previous vote repeatedly, almost excessively. iLord mentions in #1485 that this is standard for DGB; VP disagrees in #1488. I am leaning towards scum.
Hayker: I dislike lurkers on general principle, as I cannot read them. I vastly prefer replacement to lynch, however. I did not consider Adel's play to be scummy.
evilsnail: My predecessor voted evilsnail (elvis_knits notes in #1486), and I left the vote there because I liked it. I didn't leave it for his attack on Nico, but for the reasons I outlined in my first post. In fact, I still like it, on an iso read. evilsnail has had, by my estimation, one good post (iso post #11), and then a number of useless posts. The d1 posts, iso #7-9 in particular, seem incredibly fence-sitting. I remain leaning towards scum.
dramonic: Still scum.
SlySly: Started off so well, but the content has been dropping as the days have been going on. I disagree on his Adel read, and thus disagree on his lynch-Hayker stance, but his overall positions have been consistent. Read neutral.
vikingfan: I don't read vikingfan as cult, based almost entirely off of his reactions to Ellibereth's plan. His post that the Sajin graverob is one of our strongest leads is wrong and pointless, though. Read neutral.
semioldguy: I'm glad he's finally posting. Tunneling on evilsnail is a bit off-putting; I'm used to more comprehensive reads from semioldguy, and would greatly desire one. Read neutral-to-scum.
Preview edit: I see Plum's post, and I understand the words, and the jist (SlySly is scum), but not the actual argument. Will read tomorrow.
TL; DR:
Town: Animorph, elvis_knits, iLord, rewq, VP Baltar
Graverobbing-likely-scum: Ellibereth, dramonic, Kunkstar7
Other Scum: DrippingGoofball, evilsnail, semioldguy
No Good Read: Chaco, Hayker, Plum, SlySly, vikingfan, Wickedest