Pwnman's vote looked very opportunistic. He never explained why copying answers was scummy. His outrage just looks extremely fake. I don't think I can explain it better than that.Green Crayons wrote:I find it hard to think that you can come up with a meaningful opinion about someone's vote when you don't have a feeling about the player they're voting for. Of course, you're original assertion (that you "[didn't] like the way Pwnman and jason jumped on the Jack wagon. Pwnman moreso.") is far from meaningful. In fact, it's incredibly vague (which further underscores my posturing suspicion). Why did you not like pwnman's and jason's votes on Jack (now that you're clarifying your suspicion: what made it look unnatural)? Why pwnman's more so than jason's?Dry-fit wrote:I'm not sure what the problem is here. Pwnman's vote didn't look natural or like he was really suspicious of Jack's play. I don't need an opinion of the player being voted to see something fishy about the way a vote is placed.Green Crayons wrote:If you don't know what you think of Jack, how do you have an opinion of someone who voted for something you have no opinion about? This looks like posturing to make a "good" vote.
Green Crayons is still very obv town here.Green Crayons wrote:I find it hard to think that you can come up with a meaningful opinion about someone's vote when you don't have a feeling about the player they're voting for. Of course, you're original assertion (that you "[didn't] like the way Pwnman and jason jumped on the Jack wagon. Pwnman moreso.") is far from meaningful. In fact, it's incredibly vague (which further underscores my posturing suspicion). Why did you not like pwnman's and jason's votes on Jack (now that you're clarifying your suspicion: what made it look unnatural)? Why pwnman's more so than jason's?Dry-fit wrote:I'm not sure what the problem is here. Pwnman's vote didn't look natural or like he was really suspicious of Jack's play. I don't need an opinion of the player being voted to see something fishy about the way a vote is placed.Green Crayons wrote:If you don't know what you think of Jack, how do you have an opinion of someone who voted for something you have no opinion about? This looks like posturing to make a "good" vote.
vote: Bub. I'm happy with this vote after reading the back and forths.
Oh, it matters.pman5595 wrote:I'm not "barely in" this game. I just don't post anything unnecessary. As long as I'm reading and observing, it shouldn't matter that I don't post as often as some.
I guess I will try, but content for the sole point of content seems unhelpful.camn wrote:Oh, it matters.pman5595 wrote:I'm not "barely in" this game. I just don't post anything unnecessary. As long as I'm reading and observing, it shouldn't matter that I don't post as often as some.
That strategy works if only YOUR survival is important... but if you want a TOWN win, then we need to know about you. We need info.
Info = pro-town.
SO pick it up. I cannot suffer a lurker in endgame.
Good. Though you should understand.. the reason is transparency. We need to see through your posts into your role PM.pman5595 wrote: I guess I will try, but content for the sole point of content seems unhelpful.
Who ever said you did?Jack wrote:camn, where did I attack Netopolis?
But is any of this really scummy though? What is DLA's scum motivation for tunneling on him so hard? It would be a ballsy move if he is scum imo.jasonT1981 wrote:DarkLightA - seems to want nothing but the blood of Jack, I can understand some of the case against Jack, but I have backed mine up, all DarkLightA is doing is shouting JACK IS SK... OMG JACK CLAIMED.
1stly... I have already said I don't want to play guess the set up, role speculation and second guessing the mod is dangerous as it takes away from scum hunting...
DarkLightA has done no scum hunting except shout at Jack in caps lately....
unvote
vote: DarkLightA
he is dead set on Jack and no one else, has basically refused to look at the case on Bub (I can understand some of it) It's like all he wants to do is lynch Jack and look at no one else.
camn wrote:Who ever said you did?Jack wrote:camn, where did I attack Netopolis?
camn, @Netopolis wrote:It was you and Ellibereth.
You came out of the gateattacking each otherfor crap-cases.
I totally bought the whole thing, and Elli went on to win.
http://wiki.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtop ... 1c7e3e739b
You are scum, and so is Jack.
Scumteam = found.
You are very clever with your misreps, Jack.Jack wrote:I don't see how you switched from a duel-bussing theory to a "one scum busses and the other distances slightly theory" without a hitch in your stride.
camn wrote:Jack- Could be Uber-Bussing with Neto?
camn wrote: Recently I saw the most redic Day 1 dual-bus
camn wrote:You came out of the gate attacking each other for crap-cases.
...
You are scum, and so is Jack.
Scumteam = found.
camn wrote:Who ever said you did?Jack wrote:camn, where did I attack Netopolis?
camn wrote: Or are you intentionally missing the point that that post is all about Netopolis's meta?
The fact that you didn't play it exactly like Elli does not lessen your scumminess.
Your spat with Neto did not go unnoticed. The fact that you onlybristled and hinted at Neto being scumdoes not make yourdistancingany more palatable.
Your chainsaw defense of Netopolis is noted.
Where did I do that? I think he's town