Stars Aligned II - Game Over!

Chaco · Post Post #1700 (ISO) » Thu Mar 11, 2010 1:24 pm

Going through and rereading, doing what iLord did. Tomorrow though.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #1701 (ISO) » Thu Mar 11, 2010 1:45 pm

iLord wrote:Magua, Dramonic, Elli, VP, DGB, and wicked still need to claim insanities?

I did claim it, maybe even the day's first post.

Percy · Post Post #1702 (ISO) » Thu Mar 11, 2010 1:47 pm

Vote Count

SlySly - 6 (Plum, DrippingGoofball, iLord, VP Baltar, Chaco, vikingfan)

kunkstar7 - 1 (elvis_knits)
Plum - 1 (semioldguy)
dramonic - 1 (Ellibereth)
Wickedestjr - 1 (Hayker)
Hayker - 1 (rewq455)

Not Voting

- 7 (animorpherv1, dramonic, evilsnail, kunkstar7, Magua, SlySly, Wickedestjr)

Deadline for today is

10:00pm (site time) on Saturday the 27th of March

. You can view a countdown to the deadline

here

.

With 18 alive, 10 votes are required to lynch.

SlySly · Post Post #1703 (ISO) » Thu Mar 11, 2010 1:51 pm

DrippingGoofball wrote: To read SlySly, you have to put your scumdar in reverse, stand on your head, and spin from your body's tranverse plane.

You're doing it all wrong.

DGB, since you are going into full on meta mode, do you remember how I flipped the last time you flipped back and forth about my alignment and ultimately decided I was scum?

--------------------

Ellibereth wrote:Why woud Slyscum or Slymurderer claim out of the blue like that? He's town.

It does seem a little funny for people to be pushing a lynch because someone did a pro-town thing, while under absolutely no pressure, in revealing insanities that could have easily been lied about to help with a pro-town chart.

--------------------

iLord wrote: He has to explain his insanities.

I did.

--------------------

DrippingGoofball wrote:
iLord wrote:Magua, Dramonic, Elli, VP, DGB, and wicked still need to claim insanities?
I did claim it, maybe even the day's first post.

Scared to say it again in case your stories don't match?

iLord · Post Post #1704 (ISO) » Thu Mar 11, 2010 1:53 pm

SlySly wrote:It does seem a little funny for people to be pushing a lynch because someone did a pro-town thing, while under absolutely no pressure, in revealing insanities that could have easily been lied about to help with a pro-town chart.

What you did is protown in the same sense that cultist claiming cultist is beneficial to the town.

Plum · Post Post #1705 (ISO) » Thu Mar 11, 2010 2:01 pm

elvis_knits wrote:I notice an error already - Plum should have atleast 2 insanities - 1 from rezzing, 1 from the fetish.

No, check again, only the player who

got Rezzed

gets an Insanity.

You needn't huff and puff to blow Sly's claims in. No one trying to go Murderer would

ever

take Compulsion Night One. It would be suicide for the role entirely, forcing a Murderer to make it through an extra two Nights not getting closer to his wincon. Sly might be irrational/look scummy a lot, whatever. Unless you want to believe that Sly is a complete and total idiot without a shred of sense, he's lying somewhere in there, either about what Insanities he's taken, how many he's taken, that he started off the game as Town (and his interaction with scum and probable scum puts that as my top bet). Any way you slice it, he's lying and trying to make us believe he claimed to make the list of actions/Insanities more clear.

DGB is probtown. Scum would not have forgotten that their Ritual target got Rezzed and claimed it and asked for his lynch Day 2, and it didn't look faked.

SlySly · Post Post #1706 (ISO) » Thu Mar 11, 2010 2:05 pm

iLord wrote: What you did is protown in the same sense that cultist claiming cultist is beneficial to the town.

This makes absolutely no sense. My insanity reveals were pro-town in a purely pro-town sense.

Can you tell me how my reveals were pro-scum in any way?

iLord · Post Post #1707 (ISO) » Thu Mar 11, 2010 2:07 pm

SlySly wrote:This makes absolutely no sense. My insanity reveals were pro-town in a purely pro-town sense.

Can you tell me how my reveals were pro-scum in any way?

You reveals were not pro-scum in any way. In fact, they were actively anti-scum because in doing so you outed yourself as scum to be lynched.

Like in my example - if a cultist claims and we lynch him, is what he did better for the town or for the scum?

SlySly · Post Post #1708 (ISO) » Thu Mar 11, 2010 2:10 pm

iLord wrote: You reveals were not pro-scum in any way.

It is nice to see that you are not totally braindead.

iLord · Post Post #1709 (ISO) » Thu Mar 11, 2010 2:13 pm

Plum wrote:DGB is probtown. Scum would not have forgotten that their Ritual target got Rezzed and claimed it and asked for his lynch Day 2, and it didn't look faked.

I looked back and to me it doesn't seem like DGB forgot the cult targeted Phate. The exchange went something like this on Page 54:

DGB: Let's lynch Phate tommorrow!
E_K: Why?
DGB: He doesn't give me a warm fuzzy feeling. Plus, no one wants to take responsibility for rezzing him.
iLord: What about dead people?
DGB: Oh, that's right. Forgot about them.

iLord · Post Post #1710 (ISO) » Thu Mar 11, 2010 2:15 pm

SlySly wrote:It is nice to see that you are not totally braindead.

Obviously I meant to say "your" there, instead of "you."

SlySly · Post Post #1711 (ISO) » Thu Mar 11, 2010 2:53 pm

Plum wrote: No one trying to go Murderer would
ever
take Compulsion Night One.

I did, but technically, I wasn't trying to go murderer, I was planning to go murderer. There is a difference, had I been trying, I would be a murderer by now.

Plum wrote: Any way you slice it, he's lying and trying to make us believe he claimed to make the list of actions/Insanities more clear.

Me telling the truth seems to be a sure fire way for me to get lynched.

Plum · Post Post #1712 (ISO) » Thu Mar 11, 2010 2:55 pm

No one who was acting with the intention of ever maybe being a Murderer would take Compulsion Night 1. Now stop playing semantics.

SlySly · Post Post #1713 (ISO) » Thu Mar 11, 2010 3:21 pm

Plum wrote:No one who was acting with the intention of ever maybe being a Murderer would take Compulsion Night 1. Now stop playing semantics.

I did, now stop playing text deaf.

SlySly · Post Post #1714 (ISO) » Thu Mar 11, 2010 3:23 pm

Oh, and technically, it was N0.

iLord · Post Post #1715 (ISO) » Thu Mar 11, 2010 3:29 pm

SlySly wrote:I did, now stop playing text deaf.

Which portion of your response is he ignoring?

iLord · Post Post #1716 (ISO) » Thu Mar 11, 2010 3:30 pm

EBWODP: or she rather.

VP Baltar · Post Post #1717 (ISO) » Thu Mar 11, 2010 3:31 pm

iLord wrote:Magua, Dramonic, Elli, VP, DGB, and wicked still need to claim insanities?

Apparently leaving for a few hours equals pages behind in this game, so I'm not caught up and I'm only skimming right now.

I definitely agree that EK's chart should be fully filled in before the day ends and I would unvote to make sure that happens.

Now, iLord, I've claimed my insanities twice actually, but I'll go again.

I have 0 insanities

iLord · Post Post #1718 (ISO) » Thu Mar 11, 2010 3:32 pm

VP wrote:I definitely agree that EK's chart should be fully filled in before the day ends and I would unvote to make sure that happens.

Now, iLord, I've claimed my insanities twice actually, but I'll go again.

Sorry, I didn't actually look through the thread - I just scanned over E_K's chart on Page 66, which appears to be missing that information.

VP Baltar · Post Post #1719 (ISO) » Thu Mar 11, 2010 3:34 pm

It's cool. I wasn't really being angry about it or anything. I just genuinely wanted to make it large so people didn't miss it because you're not the first person to ask me about it even though I think it was my idea to start.

vikingfan · Post Post #1720 (ISO) » Thu Mar 11, 2010 5:31 pm

Plum wrote:No one who was acting with the intention of ever maybe being a Murderer would take Compulsion Night 1. Now stop playing semantics.

How do we know he's telling the truth about taking Compulsion night 1? maybe he never took it. Maybe he took something like taboo launder instead or something.

Plum · Post Post #1721 (ISO) » Thu Mar 11, 2010 6:00 pm

Sure, but either way he's lying to us about his actions and claiming that he's trying to help us by telling us the truth of his actions. There's no pro-Town motivation to do that. Whatsoever. I'm putting my money on Sly being Cult because of one or two of his interactions with Nico &c., but it's quite possible he's a Murderer. Thing is, if he thought about becoming a Murderer Night 0 and took Taboo Launder or whatever, and now he says he reformed and is going the Townie way all the way,

why is he insisting he took Compulsion that Night?

. As Town he wouldn't, so his story simply isn't true. This is a case where Lynch All Liars is beyond perfectly applicable.

kunkstar7 · Post Post #1722 (ISO) » Thu Mar 11, 2010 6:02 pm

If he didn't take what he said he took then he's still lying.

Ellibereth · Post Post #1723 (ISO) » Thu Mar 11, 2010 6:08 pm

Sly, one question, why did you target Amished? I would expect you to have targetted Phate.

vikingfan · Post Post #1724 (ISO) » Thu Mar 11, 2010 7:53 pm

iLord wrote:Bodies will be:

Iecerint (Town)
Katy (Town)
Phate (Town)
startransmission (Scum)
SlySly (Scum)
CSL (Scum)

Robbing:

Semi robs CSL + Iec
Elli robs Iec + Katy.
DGB robs Katy + Phate.
Dramonic robs Phate + Start
Magua robs Start + Sly
Chaco/kunkstar robs Sly + CSL

I want to have one probable scum combined with one nonscum for our bodies. The reason for this is that in the case of say, star, he's got 3 insanities. He's quite likely going to have nothing on him. Therefore, we should not have a robber assigned to rob both him and say CSL (or SlySly). Too easy to duck out and commit a murder/cult action and not be able to check it. Unless I'm missing something, I'm recommending changing the combinations.