I don't see the difference between a mason lynch today and a mason vig-kill tonight.
I am keeping my vote on korais, but nominate olio for being killed by mith.
Man, what a load of crap. Nice timing with the attack too, as you won't be answering for a while.Blackberry wrote: -- After reading back, through pages 3-6 or something along those lines. It appears Olio never commented on the vote on Gaspode who turned out to be a horseman. I find it odd that he completly ignored the matter and personally appear it to be very scummy. Olio also said "After a bit of thinking I agree with..." and changed your vote to mempuff. I personally think only scum would take a bit of thinking to reconsider their actions.
Your claim to be willing to be vig-killed the other day, when we were trying to sort out mith's guilty result. Killing a 'confirmed' (in your own eyes) townie is no way to win a game, so this strikes me as anti-town behavior even if you're telling the truth. Your intermittent silence whenever the heat is not on you. Getting more data about mith's kill methods.olio wrote:Mr. Flay, where do you get your willingness?
olio wrote:Ah, the crap reasons. Good. Answer these then as you have failed yet to do so, no wonder why:
Man, what a load of crap. Nice timing with the attack too, as you won't be answering for a while.Blackberry wrote: -- After reading back, through pages 3-6 or something along those lines. It appears Olio never commented on the vote on Gaspode who turned out to be a horseman. I find it odd that he completly ignored the matter and personally appear it to be very scummy. Olio also said "After a bit of thinking I agree with..." and changed your vote to mempuff. I personally think only scum would take a bit of thinking to reconsider their actions.
Which comment are you referring? As I've said before, on day one I didn't believe Gaspode was scum. That was my mistake. I've also said before I voted GH because of his votes and relationship to Aelyn, not Gaspode.
So, once you've put down your vote, you stop thinking about the game and start doing it only once you open the thread again? If that's your way to play, fine, but why do you find it scummy to do a bit of thinking?
Also, if you really read and understood my post, I didn't reconsider my actions. I had agreed with Gaspode and agreed later with mith. How do you think that's reconsidering my actions, pray tell?
I see this from a different point of view. I win with the town - if my death helps town to win, so be it.Mr. Flay wrote:Killing a 'confirmed' (in your own eyes) townie is no way to win a game, so this strikes me as anti-town behavior even if you're telling the truth.
And how does your death, as a pro-town player, help the town, if it reduces our margin by one? Worse, it means all the scum groups are free to target someone else, thus reducing the likelihood of a double-kill on you for claiming townie. I think I understand what you were trying to do, but I found it a crappy way to go about things. Now that we seem to have established a better ratio of town:scum, I'm more willing to chance that you might be bluffing. The other option might be to see what Pooky gets for investigating you.olio wrote:I see this from a different point of view. I win with the town - if my death helps town to win, so be it.Mr. Flay wrote:Killing a 'confirmed' (in your own eyes) townie is no way to win a game, so this strikes me as anti-town behavior even if you're telling the truth.
Explain please, how your death, specifically, would have confirmed the vigilante better than anyone else's. If you and mith were/are both pro-town, then you were taking one for the team in the worst possible way. We ended up going for someone more suspicious, and still turned out to be wrong. That happens. How would substituting you, on a day you were under no (or almost no) suspicion, have helped?Do you think vig shouldn't be confirmed?
Why now? What's your reasoning, just the deadline?vote: Korais
I'm townie. I think it's better to kill townie than get pro-town role out in the open. I don't quite get the logic behind your double-kill likelihood. I claimed because of vig-verify -thing. How can the double-kill happen in that case I wouldn't have claimed?Mr. Flay wrote:And how does your death, as a pro-town player, help the town, if it reduces our margin by one? Worse, it means all the scum groups are free to target someone else, thus reducing the likelihood of a double-kill on you for claiming townie.
I'd rather have vig's method of killing known for the town and I'd rather test the kill on a willing townie. Like I said there won't possibility for power-role player to be chosen as a victim and most likely outing his/her role.Mr. Flay wrote:Explain please, how your death, specifically, would have confirmed the vigilante better than anyone else's.
Why aren't you asking Pooky this question too? Yes, it's the deadline.Mr. Flay wrote:Why now? What's your reasoning, just the deadline?