Mini 931: Supreme Court Mafia (Game Over post 682)

[jasonT1981]

Also, add on how he jumped on the Camn wagon with ease and little explination.

Vote: Camn

I think this is a good way to go today.

.

Looking back ,I am confident enough to do this.

vote Darox

hahaha

You didn't look back at all, obviously, considering his camn vote is in the same post where he explains the hammer vote that you found oh so suspicious.

unvote:camn, vote:Jason

Yes... ok his camn vote was in the saem post... however he gave NO reasons for his vote on Camn and latched onto the wagon that is why my vote is on him.

[Fishythefish]

Sad to make a lurker list. Access should be fine from now on, V/LA being over.

Suspicions:
camn/pwnman for horrible play on Jack wagon. Jumping on a bad wagon and lurking there is not cool. On the other hand, camn's replacing in isn't at all bad.
jason. Harder to explain. His play on Jack feels off - like he's trying hard to make points against Jack, rather than really trying to work out Jack's alignment. I feel like he's scumhunting rigidly, using set, sloganny tells like "ignoring questions", rather than thinking about what scum actually do. His reasoning for his Darox vote seems a bit inconsistent - he's given two bad reasons (wagon hopping and failing to back up vote), and in neither case explained why that makes Darox scum. I really don't feel jason is trying to find scum, and he does things I just can't see myself doing as town.

vote: jason

[Battousai]

Vote Count:

camn -2- Darox, Dry-fit
jasonT1981 -2- Jack. Fishythefish
Yosarian2 -1- pman5595
Jack -1- DarkLightA
DarkLightA -1- camn
Darox -1- jasonT1981

Not Voting:

Netopalis, Yosarian2

With 10 alive, it takes 6 to lynch!

[Dry-fit]

After rereading the thread, Camn is still my top suspect. After his initial Jack vote, all of his posts were very short and were just defending himself. No follow-up on his vote, no opinions on anything, no nothing.

vote: Camn

.

Finals week, things get short.
What is your case? I would love to defend myself.

c

Oh, and sorry for the triple post.. but did I really vote for Jack, Dry-Fit?

That quote by me was talking about pwnman, who you replaced. I know you can't really defend his actions, since you aren't him, but you'll be held responsible none the less. Although after his last post, I'm not sure whether I want to lynch you or DLA more....

Um, the point of the post was that green crayons was obv town. Are you disagreeing with me that he looked very pro-town in that post? Or are you one of those people who thinks that no one should ever share their town reads? I don't agree with that philosaphy, personally.

I don't really mind players giving their town reads. But you'd already stated you felt GC was town, and I don't see what about that post made him look more town. It seems like either active lurking or buddying.

[Yosarian2]

I don't see what about that post made him look more town.

(shrug) He said exactly what I was thinking, both about Dry-Fit and about Bud. I was quite confident that that specific way of thinking would have been very unlikely to come from scum.

[DarkLightA]

Can you unkill me please, Jack?

[Dry-fit]

Can you unkill me please, Jack?

Can you make a post that's not about Jack being the SK? Or do you have a case for him being mafia?

[camn]

Can you unkill me please, Jack?

I dont see what about

this

post makes him look more town.

[Darox]

Unvote, Vote: DarkLightA

I changed my mind, this is a much better way to go today.

DLA, give reasoning for calling Jack SK, and give us a rundown of everyone in the game, please.

[Jack]

It's true that DLA's obstinacy feels a bit deliberate.

[Yosarian2]

DLA, give reasoning for calling Jack SK, and give us a rundown of everyone in the game, please.

(nods)

I'm sure people are going to jump all over me for saying this, but Jack is obv town here, and Dark Lights actions in response to him are looking odder and odder.

[Netopalis]

Let's take a look at DLA:

1) Late to the party: DLA came in after the whole Jack snafu and attacked it doggedly, as if he were scum who saw an easy lynch target. Apparently, he was paying so little attention that he didn't realize that nobody else was still on that tack.

2) Content? What content?: Pretty self-explanatory. Aside from the stuff about Jack, DLA has said nothing of substance. Calling the stuff about Jack substance is stretching it.

3) Floating: DLA has done his best to avoid getting involved in heavily attacking anyone aside from Jack, an easy target. This is so that he can avoid the suspicion that attends those who make cases and later turn out to be wrong.

In short:

Unvote, vote: DLA

[Fishythefish]

I'm sure people are going to jump all over me for saying this, but Jack is obv town here, and Dark Lights actions in response to him are looking odder and odder.

QFT.

DLA badly needs to talk about people who aren't Jack. Admitting lurking makes me pause though - somehow "back to lurking" doesn't sound like a lurkerscum sentiment.

[jasonT1981]

Vote: Jack

/goes back to lurking

Next post....

Kill:DarkLightA

Followed later by

Can you unkill me please, Jack?

Makes me think DLA, and Jack are both not taking this game too seriously... is their any puurpose to this exchange.

I'm beginning to think both could be scum, and trying to make us think they are to obivious scummy to be actual scum.

right now, my scum team would be

Jack
Darox
DLA

Jacks defending of Darox and attack on me for making points against Darox strike me as odd. It seems Jack was trying to gather a wagon on Camn, and now trying to get one on me.

I think this could be a scum pushed wagon on both myself and camn to be honest.

[jasonT1981]

And I once again ask this...

Right now my suspicion is still on Darklight from Yesterday.. his vote today is just off as well...

though why did you not aswer my question.

You're on a need to know basis.

Again, with the need to know basis....

why are you hiding away from questions being asked of you AGAIN today?

WHY are we on a need to know basis, you pulled this crap yesterday... its not gonna fly today when we are already down 2 town members

[jasonT1981]

I'm sure people are going to jump all over me for saying this, but Jack is obv town here, and Dark Lights actions in response to him are looking odder and odder.

QFT.

DLA badly needs to talk about people who aren't Jack. Admitting lurking makes me pause though - somehow "back to lurking" doesn't sound like a lurkerscum sentiment.

I don't agree that Jack is Obv town... sorry, I just don't buy into the Obv town theory when it comes to ANYONE in mafia. It could be a ploy between the two of them to make one look good in the eyes of the town.

However I do agree with your point about DLA, my vote was on him on day 1 come the end, and I would be comfortable with his lynch today as he is one of my 3 scum suspects at this point.

[Darox]

I think this could be a scum pushed wagon on both myself and camn to be honest.

Sigh.

[jasonT1981]

I think this could be a scum pushed wagon on both myself and camn to be honest.

Sigh.

Why sigh? why not make actual comments on what I said?

[Jack]

*shakes head*

[Netopalis]

Emoting =/= content.

[jasonT1981]

Is there a reason you keep failing to answer questions or make sagnificant posts Jack?

Or you could at least point out whats wrong with my theories rather than make pointless postings? would THAT be so hard... but yea, again I ask why you refuse to answer questions and 'need to know basis'

If the information is useful to town, that you may have... then yes.. we NEED to know

[Jack]

unvote, vote:camn

Too quiet.

[Netopalis]

Oh, for the love of all that is good and holy....

Jack, please, please, please try to change your playstyle. I'm not sure whether he's scum or not, but I'd almost support a policy lynch at this point. Note the almost, but the point is there.

[jasonT1981]

Again, any reason why you refuse to answer Jack? what is 'need to know basis' and why do the town not need to know if indeed your info is 'need to know basis'

[Netopalis]

Let's try a different approach.

Ok, we're on a need-to-know basis.

We need to know what you're hiding.

Simple enough?