Mini 931: Supreme Court Mafia (Game Over post 682)

[Yosarian2]

Oh, for the love of all that is good and holy....

Jack, please, please, please try to change your playstyle. I'm not sure whether he's scum or not, but I'd almost support a policy lynch at this point. Note the almost, but the point is there.

A policy lynch? Based on what policy, exactly?

[Jack]

The questioned I didn't answer was "What did this achieve?" in response to my "kill:darklightA" post.

[jasonT1981]

yes, but you answered it saying we 'are on a need to know basis' meaning we do not need to know about what you are saying/doing and implying you are hiding things

you pulled the 'need to know basis' crap on day 1.. and again on day 2... can you understand why you are coming under fire a little? saying ' need to know basis' implies you know stuff, and you are not willing to share with the town.. hence making you scummy.

On a smaller note, I am V/LA as per usual at weekends, however should be about a few times more than usual as I will be at home a bit more than usual

[Netopalis]

Yosarian: Obfuscation, deliberately failing to contribute and general anti-town behavior.

[Fishythefish]

@Neto, jason, DLA, whoever: What do you think Jack is hiding? What game relevant questions are outstanding atm that he needs to answer?

[Netopalis]

I don't know that he is hiding anything. Ask him, he's the one implying that he's hiding something.

[Yosarian2]

Yosarian: Obfuscation, deliberately failing to contribute and general anti-town behavior.

I'm pretty sure you're wrong on all 3 counts.

[Netopalis]

Obfuscation: Continuing to claim that he has information and we're on a need-to-know basis; the D1 FBI/Secret Service stuff

Deliberately failing to contribute: Posts 284, 310, 315, 337, to begin with. He never really explains most of his suspicions.

General anti-town behavior: He continues to draw attention to himself. If he's town, he's causing the town problems. If he's scum, he's bad at it.

[jasonT1981]

@Neto, jason, DLA, whoever: What do you think Jack is hiding? What game relevant questions are outstanding atm that he needs to answer?

Itys more the fact he is saying that he is not answering even the most simple of questions saying 'you are on a need to know basis and you do not need to know'

We are asking exactly what it is, as if he has information useful to the town he should come forward, and the fact he played this 'need to know basis' crap on day 1 and now again on day 2 leads me to believe he does indeed have something he is with-holding information to the town.

Look at his interaction with DLA... it contributes nothing to the game, Darox, Jack and DLA are all playing like this with useless postings that do not help the town in anyway, I could go over them all... but it would be a waste of time as it takes away from scum hunting. But they are all there to see on a simple Iso of the 3.

Just look at how Jack jumped to defend Darox after I cast suspicion laughing at me and casting a vote on me for thinking Darox is scum... it was almost like he was throwing his vote anywhere he can..

I see he is now back on the Camn wagon without any real reasoning... again I think it maybe or at least has the potentail to be a scum lead wagon from opertunistic scum now the town is down 2 townies.

If he really had any will to scum hunt he would not be throwing his vote around so wishy washy with little to no reasoning.... he jumped on my wagon the second someone else voiced concern (in the very next post actually) and jumped back to Camn when no one backed up his wagon hopping vote. And both DLA and Jack scoff of the fact it could be scum driven without comment just adding useless postings.

So Yea, right now my scum team still stands at

Jack
Darox
DLA

Either one of those 3 would make good lynches I feel....

I also fail to see what is behind the camn wagon also....

[jasonT1981]

If he really had any will to scum hunt he would not be throwing his vote around so wishy washy with little to no reasoning.... he jumped on my wagon the second someone else voiced concern (in the very next post actually) and jumped back to Camn when no one backed up his wagon hopping vote.

And both DLA and Jack

scoff of the fact it could be scum driven without comment just adding useless postings.

The bolded was meant to be Jack and Darox sorry.

[jasonT1981]

The questioned I didn't answer was "What did this achieve?" in response to my "kill:darklightA" post.

Well, I will ask again, what exactly did that pointless

vote
kill
please unkill me

thing achieve? or what was the purpose of the kill: post you made....

[Battousai]

Vote Count:

DarkLightA -3- camn, Darox, Netopalis
camn -2- Dry-fit, Jack
jasonT1981 -1- Fishythefish
Yosarian2 -1- pman5595
Jack -1- DarkLightA
Darox -1- jasonT1981

Not Voting:

Yosarian2

With 10 alive, it takes 6 to lynch!

[Jack]

Very well. I posted "kill:DLA" as a way of saying "you're annoying". Didn't care to explain that.

I find jason suspicious, but his reaction to votes on him was a bit paranoid for mafia. Camn's reaction to early votes was to quietly disappear.

[Jack]

Or maybe jason got jumpy about the Kill:dla post because he's scumbuddies with DLA.

[jasonT1981]

Or maybe jason got jumpy about the Kill:dla post because he's scumbuddies with DLA.

Neither actually, i found it something stupid that added nothing to the game and was completly pointless if you did not have day kill.... the exchange almost makes it look like you and DLA are not taking this game with any seriousness.

If I was scum buddies with DLA, why would I worry about a fake day kill that had no effect? my reaction is annoyance as to how you are treating the game.

So, what exactly is this 'need to know' information you have, or claim to have?

[jasonT1981]

I find jason suspicious, but his reaction to votes on him was a bit paranoid for mafia.

Sorry, can you post examples of my 'paranoia' as I continued to question you when you voted me, like I already had been doing, and continue to do so

[Yosarian2]

Obfuscation: Continuing to claim that he has information and we're on a need-to-know basis; the D1 FBI/Secret Service stuff

You really didn't realize that that was a joke?

[jasonT1981]

joke or not, the fact he is still pulling it today is redicilious and damn right scummy. You should never joke about having information that could be useful to the town and then say 'need to know basis' regardless of what day it is.

[pman5595]

ah, it seems my wagon isn't taking off. Oh well. Off to the second suspicion.

Vote: DarkLightA

[Netopalis]

Day 1? No. It wasn't obvious. Continuing it today is simply inexcusable. If it was a joke, why would he start it up again, given the amount of flak he took for it D1?

[jasonT1981]

Yea, time to pressure DLA a little bit more to post something, and explain his constant attacks on Jack (which I feel is uber-bussing) L-1 baby!!

unvote
vote:DLA

interesting Darox is on the wagon, who I also suspect as scum.

[Yosarian2]

joke or not, the fact he is still pulling it today is redicilious and damn right scummy. You should never joke about having information that could be useful to the town and then say 'need to know basis' regardless of what day it is.

He said, as an obvious joke "Kill:Darklight". You asked him "What does that achieve". He continued with "You're on a need to know basis", which was obviously another joke.

(shrug) Either that, or he was actually trying to scare darklight into thinking he got daykilled in order to get a response from him.

Either way, what he did wasn't at all scummy or anti-town, and I don't get your or Neto's reaction to it at all.

[jasonT1981]

The facty he coninues to allude to the fact he has information that could be useful but keeps telling the town we 'are need to know'

Joke or not, its tiresome... and if he does have information why not give it to the town

If not... why on day 2, page 16 and nearing 400 posts does he CONTINUE to tell people 'need to know' basis.

that is how it is scummy.. he is obiviously hiding something, and using the 'joke' as a reason not to divulge information... or at least could be.

[Netopalis]

Oh, I got that the kill: thing was obviously a joke, I'm more upset about his other reactions.

[Yosarian2]

The facty he coninues to allude to the fact he has information that could be useful but keeps telling the town we 'are need to know'

No, he dosn't.

Very well. I posted "kill:DLA" as a way of saying "you're annoying". Didn't care to explain that.

He made quite clear that that it wasn't a serious comment. I don't know why you're claiming that he "continues to allude to the fact that he has information" or whatever when that's obviously not the case.