Mini 931: Supreme Court Mafia (Game Over post 682)
-
-
Jack Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5460
- Joined: August 13, 2006
-
-
Battousai Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: December 9, 2007
- Location: Indiana
-
-
Netopalis Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3954
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: Location, Location
-
-
jasonT1981 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9671
- Joined: June 15, 2009
- Location: Mourne Mountains
-
-
camn soundtracker
- soundtracker
- soundtracker
- Posts: 7530
- Joined: April 14, 2008
- Location: GMT +9
Hihihi!
I just got home... I had a wonderful trip.
CLAIM: vanilla justice, Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
I crumbed the name, but the rest was smokescreen, trying to draw the NK.
Dry-fit next?
@Jason... give Darox some slack here. He obv has some info, and needs not be rushed."if you weren't trying to be so unnecessarily mysterious all the time we wouldn't have these misunderstandings" - Yosarian2-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
Claims with order:
Jason - Antonin Scalia, vanilla justice
Pman - Allen J Counard, town veto holder, vetoed Bub then no one.
Camn - vanilla justice, Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Dry-fit
Darox
Jack
Fishy
Netopalis
I think this is a good order (with Neto's semiclaim, I'm happy for the rearrangement). I'd also say that "claiming" doesn't have to mean claiming everything. As an example, if I'm a tracker and I'm claiming before anyone at all, my claim will be "tracker" - not my results as well. Revealing vetoing Bub is totally fine, but be wary about revealing results that could help the scum.
Dry-fit, take the stand...-
-
Dry-fit Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1971
- Joined: May 29, 2009
- Location: Florida
-
-
Darox Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2970
- Joined: May 10, 2008
- Location: The Future
No, if your claim is tracker, you're claiming all your results as well.Fishythefish wrote:I think this is a good order (with Neto's semiclaim, I'm happy for the rearrangement). I'd also say that "claiming" doesn't have to mean claiming everything. As an example, if I'm a tracker and I'm claiming before anyone at all, my claim will be "tracker" - not my results as well. Revealing vetoing Bub is totally fine, but be wary about revealing results that could help the scum.
Dry-fit, take the stand...
That's the point of the ordered mass claim, to force people to take stances before they know the full details of the set up, which makes it harder for scum to fake claim. Hence why you want suspected scum at the top of the list and confirmed townies at the bottom.
Which is why Netopalis isn't going last.-
-
Darox Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2970
- Joined: May 10, 2008
- Location: The Future
-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
-
-
Darox Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2970
- Joined: May 10, 2008
- Location: The Future
And if you're scum and want to fake claim, you want people to commit so you can craft your claim around them.Fishythefish wrote:It's your turn by my count.
I really disagree about claiming results - if you have results on people claiming later, you want the to commit before you reveal them.
Which is why, as I said above, you want the most townie people going last.
Netopalis does not fit this description.-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
I understand the principles of claim order. I actually think that all of me, Jack and Neto are likely to be town, so I'm not overly bothered about the order there. On reflection though, I am least certain of Neto, and would prefer if he claimed before Jack and I.
At any rate, I think you should claim next, Darox.-
-
Darox Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2970
- Joined: May 10, 2008
- Location: The Future
And I think you should claim next.Fishythefish wrote:I understand the principles of claim order. I actually think that all of me, Jack and Neto are likely to be town, so I'm not overly bothered about the order there. On reflection though, I am least certain of Neto, and would prefer if he claimed before Jack and I.
At any rate, I think you should claim next, Darox.
How about it?-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
I think there is something of a consensus that you are scummier than me/you should claim before me. Certainly from this thread, the following people think so:
Me, Neto, Jack, jason
And only you hold the opposite view. This is all IIRC, but I'm pretty sure I do. So I think you should be claiming now.-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
-
-
Netopalis Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3954
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: Location, Location
Darox should claim next. The names of the people that I was concerned about have already claimed, so I'm happy with claiming after Darox.My posts are best read in the calm, reassuring voice of Morgan Freeman. I don't sound anything like him, but they sound best that way.
Temporarily retiring following the end of my current obligations.-
-
Netopalis Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3954
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: Location, Location
-
-
Jack Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5460
- Joined: August 13, 2006
-
-
Netopalis Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3954
- Joined: September 2, 2009
- Location: Location, Location
Jack, I'm much more convinced of Fishy than I am of you or Darox. I'm also much more convinced of you than I am of Darox.My posts are best read in the calm, reassuring voice of Morgan Freeman. I don't sound anything like him, but they sound best that way.
Temporarily retiring following the end of my current obligations.-
-
Jack Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5460
- Joined: August 13, 2006
-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
-
-
Jack Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5460
- Joined: August 13, 2006
I do disagree with his point about the tracker. Obviously if you have a tracking result on someone who hasn't claimed yet you don't want to claim it. And scum can just say they tracked a scum partner/vanilla townie.
Darox, why did you say it "looked like fishy's turn" when the list we'd been using had him at the bottom?-
-
pman5595 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 492
- Joined: December 23, 2009
- Location: Wayzata High School
although the general consensus has Darox before Fishy, it seems that Darox has a specific reason for wanting Fishy to claim before him. I think that would be fine. IMO the order should be
Darox
Fishy
Netopolis
JackCurrent Games: [url=http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=13952]Mini 957[/url]
Record: Town- 0W/0L, Mafia- 2W/2L, Other- 0W/0L-
-
camn soundtracker
- soundtracker
- soundtracker
- Posts: 7530
- Joined: April 14, 2008
- Location: GMT +9
-
-
Darox Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2970
- Joined: May 10, 2008
- Location: The Future
Because I wanted him to go next.Jack wrote:I do disagree with his point about the tracker. Obviously if you have a tracking result on someone who hasn't claimed yet you don't want to claim it. And scum can just say they tracked a scum partner/vanilla townie.
Darox, why did you say it "looked like fishy's turn" when the list we'd been using had him at the bottom?
But whatever.
My name is Simon Jackson, and I am vanilla.
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.