It's the
Deadline for today's lynch is
Not sure what you're asking here, but lynch flavour will be forthcoming when you lynch someoneVi wrote:Mod: If Vote -> "see", what is Lynch?
Activity check tomorrow! Hope you all had a good Easter break.
Not sure what you're asking here, but lynch flavour will be forthcoming when you lynch someoneVi wrote:Mod: If Vote -> "see", what is Lynch?
Ani, I missed this in my first read through..."namely dramonic" - why is that tacked on?animorpherv1 wrote:ElectricBadger wrote:How is he trying to blend in? He hasn't posted yet!Vi's avatar is multi-coloured. Also, posting in orange on purpose. namly dramonic.
Could you be more specific? Is there something actually suspicious?farside22 wrote:People I disagree with Vi about: Llama. I'm not feeling town there in his post.
Why advise a player you're pressuring and have a vote on to take their time replying, or suggest answers to questions? Looks like a distancing vote and coaching.Ellibereth wrote:Vas, you don't have to reply immediately to everything. You can sit back and take as long as you want...
I'm also assuming the "null-tell" opinion on Ani is the correct one, right?
And I believe that is the basis for your very town read on Ani:Ellibereth wrote:I don't think scum would openly ask if anyone else had their win condition
But it contradicts with your later statement:Ellibereth wrote:Also, ani=town.
So why is Ani town? It actually seems very logical for scum to try to feel out ideas if the WC is an SK/3rd party, and especially to get them to claim if they're somehow pro-town. And if you always assumed the WC was an independent, why did you use it to give Ani a read in the first place?Ellibereth wrote:For the record I thought/think the tricolor WC is for someindependent person.
How exactly would such a player act? Without any idea of how the points of color are acquired I'm really curious how you'd assume any actions.animorpherv1 wrote:I can agree that omino doesn't have the alt-win condition, as omino doesn't seem to act like I think the player with the alt-win con would do.
Gah...please just separate out your answers, not insert them into quotes...especially when you're inserting other quotes and such in there as well.Robocopter87 wrote:Answers in red.
That was...quite the weird reaction. So yeah, Elli's voted alot - does that have some meaning for you, beyond there being lots of votes? From your first post you've been quick to cite facts but given almost zero analysis of the game, which makes votes against you understandable at the least.Robocopter87 wrote:With that being said I think you see why I said "vote enough". I think it was called for and legit in all ways.
Explain?Vi wrote:It's a matter of math.Ellibereth 51 wrote:Why do you think the 3 of all colors thing is the scum WC?
I also believe there are three scum.
I don't think that I ever played with you. But whatever, I'm not the biggest fan of you anyway.Well it is Maemuki and Dramonic.
Hint: if you want to speak another language, try thinking on that language. Seriously, it's fun!Do I seriously to have to defend myself from my own language problems?
I don't count, right?Nah, its more that just almost this entire player list has at least a years experience
Don't you mean "I am so fluffing my post"?I am so clinging to this right now.
Don't you mean "I'M SPECULATING ON THE SETUP SO I'M TOWN, LOL"?I honestly have nothing to add to this yet as I'm struggling to follow most of it. Actually, I don have one thing... Does the special win condition look like an altered Mason Leader/Recruiter role to anyone else?
No?ElectricBadger 151 wrote:Explain?Vi wrote:It's a matter of math.Ellibereth 51 wrote:Why do you think the 3 of all colors thing is the scum WC?
I also believe there are three scum.
?Maemuki 155 wrote:He's on thisVi wrote:TonyMontana always lurksgame?
Bolded is all one bit.ElectricBadger wrote:Ani, I missed this in my first read through..."namely dramonic" - why is that tacked on?animorpherv1 wrote:ElectricBadger wrote:How is he trying to blend in? He hasn't posted yet!Vi's avatar is multi-coloured.Also, posting in orange on purpose. namly dramonic.
Oh I dunno, maybe the fact that that one post included a vla notice aCould give a clue.Robocopter87 wrote: Tony Montana-1 Whats with the only one post?
Are you really saying that because dram was willing to lynch ani on page three, you became willing to lynch dram at the same time.Robocopter87 wrote:He jumped on a popular wagon without adding anything to the discussion and then decided that he was perfectly comfortable with lynching Ani.
Fair enough, who is a better lynch though?ElectricBadger wrote:He doesn't seem to need a wagon to keep talking; dramonic does.Vi wrote:Why not vote Robocopter?
Oops, sorry.Tony wrote: Oh I dunno, maybe the fact that that one post included a vla notice aCould give a clue.
Everyone seemed to want to know why I said vote enough. So I stated why I said it. And compared it to the amount of votes everyone else had. I wasn't saying I was suspicious or anything but why I said it. That is all, yet people are blowing it out of proportion.Farside wrote: robowhat? I don't understand the point of this post at all.
Iso of Robo 'cause it's hard to answer without one and I may as well post my reads:LlamaFluff wrote:Fair enough, who is a better lynch though?
Seems like the pot and kettle comment here to me.Robocopter87 wrote:The amount of votes mean nothing. I'm just completely confused about why Vi would see what I said about Dram as town. He jumped on a popular wagon without adding anything to the discussion and then decided that he was perfectly comfortable with lynching Ani. How is that town?
.