Mini 931: Supreme Court Mafia (Game Over post 682)


User avatar
Jack
Jack
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Jack
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5460
Joined: August 13, 2006

Post Post #700 (ISO) » Mon Apr 05, 2010 3:46 pm

Post by Jack »

Your question list at the beginning.
User avatar
Yosarian2
Yosarian2
(shrug)
User avatar
User avatar
Yosarian2
(shrug)
(shrug)
Posts: 16394
Joined: March 28, 2005
Location: New Jersey

Post Post #701 (ISO) » Mon Apr 05, 2010 3:49 pm

Post by Yosarian2 »

Ah, well. Good game, everyone.

Yeah, I was breadcrumbing my innocent results on GC and Jack, I'm glad people noticed that. I was hoping I was going to live to day 3, get one more confirmed innoent, and then claim, and then with me and hopefully two living confirmed innocents, I thought the town might still have a chance. Sadly, it wasn't going to happen.

To the scum: did you notice my breadcrumbs? Was that why you killed me?
I want us to win just for Yos' inevitable rant alone. -CrashTextDummie
User avatar
Battousai
Battousai
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Battousai
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3168
Joined: December 9, 2007
Location: Indiana

Post Post #702 (ISO) » Mon Apr 05, 2010 3:50 pm

Post by Battousai »

camn wrote:Also, my apologies, Darox.... I was really egging you on there for a while. I hope you weren't too mad :)
Almost everything I accused you of I was actually doing intentionally.....
When you and Darox had your rounds, I was just mad the other towns didn't pick up on the fact that you refused to do something because you didn't want to do the work for scum (which was just looking to see who posted last, not like discovering bread crumbs). I wanted to just give Darox a 1-shot day vig ability ("As you sit down to think about who is doing the killing, you remember that you have a gun. You check the cartridge and notice it is empty, however there is a bullet in the chamber").

Neto played pretty good scum, IMO. If I was playing I may not have picked up on him being scum early, but might have through linking later if scum were lynched.

I expected the researcher would not be all that effective, maybe only working once. I expected that the veto holder would be a null role, as it isn't the most effective ability. I thought town was going into the game with the game tipped in their favor, but I obviously underestimated the researcher role.
User avatar
Darox
Darox
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Darox
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2970
Joined: May 10, 2008
Location: The Future

Post Post #703 (ISO) » Mon Apr 05, 2010 3:51 pm

Post by Darox »

Battousai wrote:I wanted to just give Darox a 1-shot day vig ability
That would have been so sweet.
User avatar
Jack
Jack
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Jack
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5460
Joined: August 13, 2006

Post Post #704 (ISO) » Mon Apr 05, 2010 3:52 pm

Post by Jack »

Battousai wrote:(On N0, all roles acted at same time and Jack could have gotten a positive result).
damn...I thought it would do nothing, because I got the result of what they did the previous night.
User avatar
Netopalis
Netopalis
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Netopalis
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3954
Joined: September 2, 2009
Location: Location, Location

Post Post #705 (ISO) » Mon Apr 05, 2010 3:53 pm

Post by Netopalis »

Oh, that. What I said about it was true - I really did do it in two batches.

Battousai - The researcher role normally wouldn't be all that overpowered. However, on D2 and 3, it was fairly obvious who was going to get lynched the next day - or at least who there was a substantial probability of a bandwagon on.
My posts are best read in the calm, reassuring voice of Morgan Freeman. I don't sound anything like him, but they sound best that way.

Temporarily retiring following the end of my current obligations.
User avatar
camn
camn
soundtracker
User avatar
User avatar
camn
soundtracker
soundtracker
Posts: 7530
Joined: April 14, 2008
Location: GMT +9

Post Post #706 (ISO) » Mon Apr 05, 2010 3:53 pm

Post by camn »

@ YOSARIAN

I didn't notice them until you were dead...

I voted you then because the good play would have been No-Lynch, I think... and I thought you would have been the only one with the clout to push it through.
Plus, I think you are very strong in endgame, and I wasn't relishing facing off against you :)

You and GC were pretty obvious targets to me. Both of you know my meta. And neither of you are swayed by my charms.. :(
"if you weren't trying to be so unnecessarily mysterious all the time we wouldn't have these misunderstandings" - Yosarian2
User avatar
Jack
Jack
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Jack
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5460
Joined: August 13, 2006

Post Post #707 (ISO) » Mon Apr 05, 2010 3:56 pm

Post by Jack »

Boo, I totally misunderstood my role. I was thinking I could find track the killers, on top of not realizing I could send in N0...
User avatar
camn
camn
soundtracker
User avatar
User avatar
camn
soundtracker
soundtracker
Posts: 7530
Joined: April 14, 2008
Location: GMT +9

Post Post #708 (ISO) » Mon Apr 05, 2010 3:56 pm

Post by camn »

Lets put our QT up.
Pman wont care.. and if he does, Bat can take it down, no?

Here it is:
http://www.quicktopic.com/44/H/r6fr5BDvMQz
"if you weren't trying to be so unnecessarily mysterious all the time we wouldn't have these misunderstandings" - Yosarian2
User avatar
pman5595
pman5595
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
pman5595
Goon
Goon
Posts: 492
Joined: December 23, 2009
Location: Wayzata High School

Post Post #709 (ISO) » Mon Apr 05, 2010 3:57 pm

Post by pman5595 »

this game was so scum sided, it was nearly impossible for us to lose.

This game also has reinforced my meta of acting town as scum and scum as town.
Current Games: [url=http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=13952]Mini 957[/url]
Record: Town- 0W/0L, Mafia- 2W/2L, Other- 0W/0L
User avatar
Netopalis
Netopalis
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Netopalis
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3954
Joined: September 2, 2009
Location: Location, Location

Post Post #710 (ISO) » Mon Apr 05, 2010 3:59 pm

Post by Netopalis »

pman5595 wrote:this game was so scum sided, it was nearly impossible for us to lose.

This game also has reinforced my meta of acting town as scum and scum as town.
Uh. You're doing it wrong.
My posts are best read in the calm, reassuring voice of Morgan Freeman. I don't sound anything like him, but they sound best that way.

Temporarily retiring following the end of my current obligations.
User avatar
camn
camn
soundtracker
User avatar
User avatar
camn
soundtracker
soundtracker
Posts: 7530
Joined: April 14, 2008
Location: GMT +9

Post Post #711 (ISO) » Mon Apr 05, 2010 4:00 pm

Post by camn »

Battousai wrote:
camn wrote:Also, my apologies, Darox.... I was really egging you on there for a while. I hope you weren't too mad :)
Almost everything I accused you of I was actually doing intentionally.....
When you and Darox had your rounds, I was just mad the other towns didn't pick up on the fact that you refused to do something because you didn't want to do the work for scum (which was just looking to see who posted last, not like discovering bread crumbs). I wanted to just give Darox a 1-shot day vig ability ("As you sit down to think about who is doing the killing, you remember that you have a gun. You check the cartridge and notice it is empty, however there is a bullet in the chamber")..
That would be SO unethical!
But I did enjoy the irony of that argument.
Especially when I accused him of "muddying up the thread" and the like.. directly after posting pages worth of nothing at all!
"if you weren't trying to be so unnecessarily mysterious all the time we wouldn't have these misunderstandings" - Yosarian2
User avatar
Battousai
Battousai
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Battousai
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3168
Joined: December 9, 2007
Location: Indiana

Post Post #712 (ISO) » Mon Apr 05, 2010 4:08 pm

Post by Battousai »

pman5595 wrote:this game was so scum sided, it was nearly impossible for us to lose.

This game also has reinforced my meta of acting town as scum and scum as town.
How so? Town had two investigative roles, a sane cop and a role that can find the scum's most powerful role (since Neto lied about not being a researcher, he would have been outted if he was previously investigated).
User avatar
camn
camn
soundtracker
User avatar
User avatar
camn
soundtracker
soundtracker
Posts: 7530
Joined: April 14, 2008
Location: GMT +9

Post Post #713 (ISO) » Mon Apr 05, 2010 4:11 pm

Post by camn »

I agree, Bat. I think we got lucky and leveraged the researcher role pretty well, wheras Jack got UNLUCKY and got nothing.

It also helped that we killed Yos's target right away....

I think it was balanced.
"if you weren't trying to be so unnecessarily mysterious all the time we wouldn't have these misunderstandings" - Yosarian2
User avatar
Netopalis
Netopalis
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Netopalis
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3954
Joined: September 2, 2009
Location: Location, Location

Post Post #714 (ISO) » Mon Apr 05, 2010 4:11 pm

Post by Netopalis »

Well, scum had two roles that interfered with votes. That's much more powerful than a mere investigative role, at least it is to any scum who has an idea of what they're doing.
My posts are best read in the calm, reassuring voice of Morgan Freeman. I don't sound anything like him, but they sound best that way.

Temporarily retiring following the end of my current obligations.
User avatar
pman5595
pman5595
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
pman5595
Goon
Goon
Posts: 492
Joined: December 23, 2009
Location: Wayzata High School

Post Post #715 (ISO) » Mon Apr 05, 2010 4:13 pm

Post by pman5595 »

2 scum power roles is too much. 3 for town and 1 for scum would be even.

And the Veto-holder is kind of a useless role. It would almost never actually be needed, and when it would be, it would show the likely alignment of the veto-holder and the would-be-lynchee

so 2 for town one for scum.
Current Games: [url=http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=13952]Mini 957[/url]
Record: Town- 0W/0L, Mafia- 2W/2L, Other- 0W/0L
User avatar
Fishythefish
Fishythefish
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Fishythefish
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4362
Joined: November 2, 2008
Location: England

Post Post #716 (ISO) » Mon Apr 05, 2010 7:18 pm

Post by Fishythefish »

Jack wrote:btw, Fishy, if that wasn't a "I'm mafia hammering for the win" post I don't know what is. You had me convinced :lol:
TBH, I thought I was either town voting scum or town hammering the mafia win. In either case, I couldn't be bothered explaining myself, and didn't need to. Momentarily, I'd forgotten that today could happen in a real way. I'm glad that it didn't matter much - I'd have felt pretty thick.

A good job all round from the scum.
User avatar
jasonT1981
jasonT1981
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
jasonT1981
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 9671
Joined: June 15, 2009
Location: Mourne Mountains

Post Post #717 (ISO) » Tue Apr 06, 2010 2:47 am

Post by jasonT1981 »

Good game, but if Jack got a negitive on me, meaning I did nothing in the night... why did he vote me? lol
User avatar
Netopalis
Netopalis
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Netopalis
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3954
Joined: September 2, 2009
Location: Location, Location

Post Post #718 (ISO) » Tue Apr 06, 2010 2:49 am

Post by Netopalis »

Only one member of the scumteam actually takes a night action - a no-action result means nothing.
My posts are best read in the calm, reassuring voice of Morgan Freeman. I don't sound anything like him, but they sound best that way.

Temporarily retiring following the end of my current obligations.
User avatar
jasonT1981
jasonT1981
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
jasonT1981
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 9671
Joined: June 15, 2009
Location: Mourne Mountains

Post Post #719 (ISO) » Tue Apr 06, 2010 7:40 am

Post by jasonT1981 »

Ah, fair enough
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #720 (ISO) » Tue Apr 06, 2010 3:55 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

Oh well. Nice sweep scum.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
MeMe
MeMe
Post or Perish
User avatar
User avatar
MeMe
Post or Perish
Post or Perish
Posts: 10710
Joined: October 6, 2002
Location: Missouri

Post Post #721 (ISO) » Sun Sep 12, 2010 6:46 am

Post by MeMe »

last post
Remember...It's not a lie if you believe it. -- G. Costanza

Return to “Completed Mini Theme Games”