It's the
Deadline for today's lynch is
Your wish is my command. I shall do it.farside22 wrote:Just do the write up and stop making excuses. Your excuses don't matter to me. I just want to see if you can write something on and put a basis on who, what and why.Robocopter87 wrote:@Farside
The only problem with going through with a notepad is that I'll be called out for IIoA and it will all go to dirt. The fatal flaw with my playstyle is my inability to explain why I think A certain way. Which really isn't good for Mafia but I try. I point out the the basis of my reasons by showing where I got them and can't really explain why I think its scummy.
that is up to a mod and doesn't have anything to do with a player in the game who may believe that the V/LA is a lie when they read a player is posting elsewhere.dramonic wrote:By my standards lying about vla to avoid contributing is passible with a force replace.
Implies I wouldnt do it, implies VV's accusation is hogwashfarside22 wrote:that is up to a mod and doesn't have anything to do with a player in the game who may believe that the V/LA is a lie when they read a player is posting elsewhere.dramonic wrote:By my standards lying about vla to avoid contributing is passible with a force replace.
I don't see how that makes VV scummy.
and he knows this how? The physic network?dramonic wrote:Implies I wouldnt do it, implies VV's accusation is hogwashfarside22 wrote:that is up to a mod and doesn't have anything to do with a player in the game who may believe that the V/LA is a lie when they read a player is posting elsewhere.dramonic wrote:By my standards lying about vla to avoid contributing is passible with a force replace.
I don't see how that makes VV scummy.
ElectricBadger wrote:Robocopter87 wrote:*I think its because I have absolutely no idea where to start. In the beginning of the thread I felt really lost because it was hard to understand what I should be doing.I'm confused by this in the wake of your vanilla claim. Why wouldn't you know what you're supposed to be doing?Robocopter87 wrote:I understood my position [in another game] and what I was supposed to do. This is a little more difficult.
Seriously? You have got to be joking with that statement. How do you get that he is being obtuse?ElectricBadger wrote:Hmm...better post by Robo, mostly just repeating what others have said, though.And I think being deliberately obtuse about his suspect claim. I'd still like an answer to this:
Call me Vas, ;D A little less active than I used to be due to IRL. Hoping to be back up to speed soon-ish!
farside22 wrote:Seriously? You have got to be joking with that statement. How do you get that he is being obtuse?
That, addressed to Seacore but relating to the same contradiction I asked him about, with specific quotes, which he was ignoring at the time.Robocopter87 wrote:You make no attempt wether to figure out wether I did fake claim or not. You immediatly assume that I Fake claimed. what are your reasons for saying I fake claimed?
I considered it basically a null-tell in both cases. I've also repeated several cases, even just this game.farside22 wrote:And don't get me started about players repeating what others said when Seacore said his vote was on Robo for what others said. Why are you not giving him grief on it?
There may be other tells based on game mechanics, sure, and I get why you aren't posting those. But you weren't looking for any of the usual ones, either, so that explanation doesn't really sit well with me.Robocopter87 wrote:what can I consider scummy other than the usualy scumtells, because this is a theme game speculation will take place and I don't know how to go about this speculation.
I'm in another ongoing game with you and moderating another. I will not bring up or discuss your meta, sorry.Robocopter87 wrote:I think that EB means that I'm not acting like I act in most of my games. But I want to know if EB meant that in a good or bad way.
I will take VI for 100 Alex!LlamaFluff wrote: @farside - Do you think robo is town or just less scum?
No, you didn't say so. Which of course is going to stand out, since I specifically asked you about it. Which would be bad enough, pre-emptive self-excusing aside, but you actually said theVi wrote:EBWOP:*So I moved on.Vi 320 wrote:I started getting the impression that the cop was leaning more toward VIdom.So I did.
To answer your reflexive objection I didn't explicitly mention that I was starting to have misgivings about Robocop at the time. DWI.
And I still find 'timing of my vote' to be a rather ironic case, as you were equally suspicious when I wasn't voting for Robo:Vi wrote:1) I'm dropping my pressure to see if any of the other lusers who are saying "oh he has enough pressure" are going to step up.
2) There are no good reasons not to suspect Robocopter except that I dislike the timing of your vote and L-Fluff's vote (whose vote was the one I called out as following public opinion).
Vi wrote:Why not vote Robocopter?
...which would suggest that at the very least I expected scum to be hopping onto the wagon, which in turn suggests that it's less likely to be a wagon on scum.Vi #25 wrote:1) I'm dropping my pressure to see if any of the other lusers who are saying "oh he has enough pressure" are going to step up.
2) There are no good reasons not to suspect Robocopter except that I dislike the timing of your vote and L-Fluff's vote (whose vote was the one I called out as following public opinion).The formal-sounding case[ElectricBadger presented]sounds like something scum would post to keep their bases covered (as you're attempting to demonstrate now) - the people voting Robocop before you have already brought out all of those points, albeit not with the melodious nuances of your posting style.
And that whole attack on ani at the beginning based on that information I have? Right, that's me making stuff up out of whole clothVi #23 wrote:E-Badger, has it occurred to you that Townies could have information that scum don't? and what that implies about your constant fishing about for what people are trying to hide?~
E-Badger 343 wrote:Quality.
Yes I do. Is there a problem?Badger wrote:Elli, did you realize you were switching your vote off a claimed VT at L-1?
Vas wrote:Still, I do not discount the possibility of him being scum, since meta is my appetizer. Breaded vote analysis with cream of NK theorizing are my main course. We'll see as the game moves along.
Links plz?Seacore wrote: Dramonic is not obvscum, he always looks like this. I've seen him flake out on a game while signing up for a new one and flaking out on that. He was town in both.
I have thought about this before. I think that claiming really sucks.Llama wrote: @robo - What are your views on lynching VT claims?