Thor665 wrote:silverbullet999 wrote:now i feel you are just being aggressive to find mafia
Dear sir, if you think I'm aggressive you should wait and see some of the fellows from the "regular" Mafia games here. I'm a pussycat.
As currently stands - clearly [no] is working hard to dig himself a nice hole but I'm still getting such newbish vibes off of him it is hard to read clearly. I'm lukewarm about the timing of Jerako's vote and that right after his claimed need to assess more he promptly hops on what is clearly the hottest wagon around.
The way I see this is that Thor is actually asking questions well, and being pretty laid back. He's addressing issues, but not pushing them harder than he feels they need to be pushed. In all honesty I think he's playing a nice soft game of Mafia so far, getting you guys more used to the climate.
Thor wrote:@Pulindar, I'm surprised you called out [no] without addressing the newbie issue. What's your read there?
eh not sure. I'm currently in five newbie games, and obviously have finished others. three of those games lynched scum. Two on the first day. every time it was a newbie playing the part poorly. Some major slip, some major thing. In the fourth game I have determined who the scum are, and again the first one was a newbie who made a major slip. I think [no] probably falls into this category, but I'm not sure. Plus, I want to have others express their opinions before weighing in too strongly with my own and over turning the game without people learning. These games are more for learning (in a couple days one of them should end and I'll show you what I mean)
Thor wrote:
Also, what was up with your RVS (now returned) of Nacho for 'reading you well'. Presumably if you're town you wouldn't worry about a scum reading you, because they already know who is town, so the logical presumption is you are scum afraid of town Nacho's foresight into your methods. Thoughts?
I like this question
it supposes stuff, and drills me, and yet offers room to move. It's a well built question that gives the reader a chance to show that they're town, and will throw scum off. Everyone should read it. Specific questions like this help both the defender and the attacker.
Now, to answer. RVS happens to be my favorite section of the game. I'll return to it a few times, sometimes even on day two if I find no argument worth while and there's no reason I see not too. probably not in this game though too much to work with already.
So, that's part of my reason to returning to RVS. As for voting Nacho. I'm familiar with him, and enjoy him as a player. When I've been scum, or town, with my favorite players I tend to let them live longer than others just because I like playing with them. Basically, my RV is back on Nacho because I do not think anything will come of it. I doubt that anyone else plans on voting him, or that even if one or two do, that he'll be lynched before I sign on again. It seemed like a safe place to park my vote. I also tend to like keeping my vote on someone. I feel safe with it on Nacho. when I don't feel safe with my vote somewhere I don't vote and that makes me unhappy.
So... several reasons actually.
mmm last thing, I found out the Town tell Nacho gets from me and I now try to mix it up in all my games. I'm only semi successful, but suffice it to say that there was not the right circumstance for Nacho to tell my alignment yet anyway.
"If I had to label someone as dangerous, it'd be Pulindar. I have a feeling his scum game is very similar to his town game.... What I think is dangerous about Pulindar is that his scumreads feel so liquid. He can post a wall of questions and decide he doesn't like your answer to one of them and justify a vote on you." ~ Prawneater
