Ugh, I just made a rather lengthy post and it was totally eaten by the interwebs when I clicked the preview button and failed to connect to MS
At least I'll probably be a bit more concise this time.
Yes, I am very concerned about lynching someone that is not scum. Arent you?
If [no] was on L-1 and you still hadnt voted, would you lynch him now?
That seems like a moot point to me, since I already have voted, and your avoidance of the vote was on L-2, not the hammer. Neither of which applies to the situation.
You currently placed him at L-2. Are you going to unvote if somebody brings him to L-1 again?
Hypothetically though, if we were in that situation, no, I would not vote for [no] right now if I was the hammer vote, until he roleclaims first, which I learned is a Good Thing in my last game. If his roleclaim is unsatisfactory though, I would be glad to lynch him, especially since I'm even more convinced, now that he's completely ignored my last post (although he's posted since then, so he's seen it), which seems to suggest that he really is just being vague about his intentions. He doesn't want to give his reasons for the vote, I think, because he never had any in the first place.
Yes, if somebody gets lynched who ends up being town, it's a mislynch. This is an error, not a failure, however. It's not the end of the world, and I'm not going to let the chance of it happening keep me from voting for somebody who I'm certain is scum. Isn't it also possible that we're going to hit the actual scum? I don't think it's that much of a stretch to think that those we find the most suspicious, could be the most suspicious because they are actually mafia. However, even if the lynched does flip town, we still have more information than we did before, which helps us to better find the actual mafia on D2. This is a game where the town wins by becoming more informed, so any more information can only help us.
I find your wishy-washy stance to be suspicious. The purpose of a vote is to bring about a lynch, yes? So, what, exactly, are you trying to accomplish by voting in a manner that specifically avoids lynching? Clearly, from your posts, you find [no] to be suspicious. On a scale of 1-10, how suspicious would that be, exactly?