1 To get him to vote at least. That way you always force someone to pick some side, even in RVS. Voting analysis, I bet I don't have to explain that to you.wolframnhart wrote:If you didn't expect a well based vote why bother voting him at all?FC wrote:1 He voted and there were no serious/well based bandwagons so far so I didn't expect a well based vote. His activity is lacking compared to other's but he did post. If you want more of him, feel free to pressure him yourself.
So you voted because if you didn't it would seem scummy? I find scum are more worried about what people think about their actions. Why would THC have to be the best alternative? Because he had votes against himself? You could have looked at the other players and found someone else2 Yes, my vote had other reasons. 1, I was asked to vote because it seemed scummy to withhold a vote, so I picked the best alternative there was according to myself. 2, I did and do not expect that this vote will lead to a lynch, but if Wreckstar or K-7 would get on 7 or 8, the odds might go up.youthought was scummy, but instead you went where other votes and suspicions were.
You are new to this site, but not mafia if i remember correctly from your posts in the Queue, and when semi-old guy voted you and started asking you questions you "believed him" about K7 and now have gone towards THC.3 Yep, I'm new to this site so I don't know any of you or how you all play. Since no one bothered to argue against semioldguy, I assume he was right. Also considering no one voted for K-7 afterwards except twoheaded, I think he was right as well.
as far as i see this is the only real time you mention anything against THC:4 I'm not convinced twoheadedcyclops is scum, but I do consider him more likely to be scum right now. Why? See my earlier post(s) about him and also because I think both alternative bandwagons aren't well founded as I've said a few times before. K-7 for not partaking in discussions apparantly and Wreckstar for personal reasons. I think the bandwagons on these guys will lead to nothing unless some new facts about these guys come up, so I do think it would be wise to change to focus to other people.Because he joined a bandwagon late. And how can you think that a bandwagon against someone who is not taking part in discussions (which is what you say about K-7) will lead to nothing?FC wrote:<snip>FOS: Twoheadedcyclops for joining the K7 bandwagon this late.
2 I think any player regardless of side will try to stay alive, unless he/she is planning some sacrifice in order to let his side win. About other alternatives, possible, but I already explained my case on him. Also, if you read back you can see that I presented my case on THC when he had no votes on him, but added a FoS instead of a vote. Reasons why were also already stated. In other words, I didn't need someone else to have the bandwagon started, I just thought a FoS would do and would have the same effect.
3 As you said, I'm not new to mafia, but as far as I know/knew, the reason to lynch K-7 was based on a personal habit/trait of his. Which is to contribute little and not partaking in the RVS. Thats not something I could know, without either someone pointing that out for me or something I have to find out firsthand. In fact, me not being new to mafia led me to suspect K-7 in the first place, because its an obvious scumtell on Nukezone. (other site I used to play Mafia/Werewolf)
4 post 107
5 Because apparantly K-7 always acts like that. And unless K-7 always turns out to be evil, that doesn't say anthing about him either being town or scum, but it might say something about his ability to play this game.
