Spyrex 88 wrote:Yo Red please tell me I'm not insane and that reads "I've got adam" for no reason and help me push this train all the way out of the station.
I definitely get the same feeling, but do you think it's necessarily scummy? I can easily read it as a PR who is overanxious to get to the night phase. However...
horrordude 89 wrote:Not really... he said that he wants to get the chance to use the adam he's HEARD about, not has.
...
this
has my eyes widening. Something about this is phrased awkwardly. It's not like he's saying that he thinks Chrono was innocent and we're making much ado over nothing. horrordude seems genuinely sure of himself. He knows what Chrono meant, and he's going to clarify it for us.
If not for this post, I think I may have left it alone. It's too juicy at this point though; I'm game.
Unvote
;
vote: Chronopie
---
RECKONER 90 wrote:Red has two posts so far: one which was his RVS vote, and this previous one.
Red, why is your vote still on me if you think sora's post is worse than mine?
I like how you drop in a post count without commenting on it. Does it bother you that I only have two posts?
I said it might be worse than yours. I didn't actually go back and check whether or not that was actually sora's first "real" post. I just did, and it looks like it was.
---
sora 91 wrote:What exactly would you like me to comment on? I appreciate that you're trying to promote discussion, but let's keep the BS to a minimum.
BS? You're the one complaining about everyone else's activity, not me. When the player doesn't have anything they can point to, then I'm going to call them out for that. I think the game is moving at an adequate pace. You can comment on whatever you like.
Moreover, if you're going to use activity as a measuring stick, then I think you're going to have a hell of a time explaining how I'm more of a threat than some other players (FFFF, MehPlusRawr, killa seven, Nacho... etc).
sora 93 wrote:Coyote seems to be a player who likes to make a few really long posts, quoting everything, just to seem helpful.
Due to my schedule, I don't traditionally have the time to check the website multiple times a day. If you're going to use that against me, then I'm going to hit you up with meta arguments. I don't think either of us want to go down that road.
---
Cry 99 wrote:# How much experience do you have playing mafia? Please include any off site forums which you play to.
# What would you say is your scum meta is?
# What would you say your town meta is?
# Someone just got quicklynched, and is town. What do you do?
# Same situation, but quicklynched is scum.
# Your #1 scum read got NK'ed last night, and you have no reads on anyone else, and it's LYLO. What do you do?
1) Over two years.
http://www.epicmafia.com
2) Hmmm... I probably have more of an agenda as scum, as broad as that sounds.
3) I don't know. There's nothing I can point to that I specifically do as town that I wouldn't do otherwise. I'm more open to lynches, for sure.
4) Ask questions.
5) Ask questions.
6) Re-read.
---
sora 106 wrote:I was trying to get people to post in order to bring up more opportunities to scumhunt (by posting), because, if you hadn't noticed, hardly anyone posted during those first few days. Hey, it worked! I'd rather be the center of attention than no one post in thread
I'm of the opinion you do it by asking questions and giving opinions rather than saying, "Hey, everyone needs to post". There's such an obvious irony in posts like that, you know, when you don't have anything else to point to. Why do you excuse yourself?
---
Leech 116 wrote:The questions weren't really scumhunting, but there's really not much else to do
Casting a vote might be something else to do.
---
sora 119 wrote:I'll just come right out and say that my role PM told me I don't have any. I'm wondering if it's the same deal as the vote-transfer in the Last Will Mafia, or if certain roles get Adam each night and pass it on...or whatever.
Hmmm...
Do you think Spyrex is right? Should we focus more on pooling our resources? Should we keep any ADAM we get for our own usage?
sora 122 wrote:See, guys? Now THIS is real discussion. You know, game stuff. Now let's build on this.
Well, it's very sketchy at this point. I don't think our time is best served telling each other how much ADAM we have, although I'd imagine it would be easy to lie about it. Realistically, I just don't think the town will benefit from it at this point. The scum have more information than we do now, so I think those are the only people who are really benefiting from this.
---
Spyrex 124 wrote:And reactive play doesn't do anyone any good. In fact between that and the reaction I think I done got myself a live one.
I don't want to jinx it, but he sure is acting erratic. I see nothing wrong with this wagon.
---
Mod
: What's the deal on the Nacho situation? Also I'm pretty sure that killa seven hasn't posted yet. Are you keeping tabs on who needs prods?
