Vi wrote:ElectricBadger 799 wrote:In other news, we seem to've moved from condescending to passive aggressive. Yay.
I feel like a real menace to society now.
Nah, that was a poke at the mom voice and the dear diary BS.
Vi wrote:*Is anyone else noticing that hp[leaves] is explicitly looking for a third party and only a third party?
Very good point.
Maemuki
-Iso 2: long, but pure fluff, votes omnino – only more useless player
-Continues with zero scumhunting
-iso 8 isn’t going to move vote until slot has been filled and ‘redeemed’ – VERY scummy, trying to earn townie points as anti-lurker but is actually actively lurking herself to do it
-light attacks on robo but refuses to vote him
Summary: Generally pointless, no scumhunting, voting an empty slot…seems to’ve mistaken the game for a chat group. Quits when called out on vote. Scummy read.
Hp[leaves]
-iso 2 votes Vas (lurking) – valid, but also easy first vote…meh.
-iso 4 first analysis: TM = neutral read…not very helpful
-iso 5 on llama, votes, mediocre case
-iso 6 “Claim, scum” – no comments or suspicions on me at all, but suddenly convinced I’m scum – transparent attempt to follow the crowd
No commentary on Llama following his claims? Strange to abandon primary suspect without a word
-iso 11 v. unreasoned votes, valid defense. Setup speculation – only an SK, no mafia…unlikely to have a single scum in a 12 player game; attempt at misdirection?
-iso 12 more setup speculation – very tenuous link between roles, but no conclusions; more distraction is unhelpful to town
-iso 13 backtracking on setup spec, promises detailed read on Seacore (competing wagon makes this very overdue) - but only comment is vague, no questions or analysis
-iso 15 is barely a case on dram, obviously a token vote after being called out by Vi rather than an explanation - very scummy
Summary: Heavy lurking, minimal scumhunting; several scum tells and no town tells.
Vi wrote:I definitely have a theory here but I'll wait for responses to the above.
*Curious*
