Mini 961: Insane Asylum II: GAME OVER :O!

[Glork]

Yeah, mafiawise, there aren't many people left who can call me junior, young'un.

[Tarhalindur]

First order of business (since I forgot to do this in my first post - oops!): I am a Miller (this may or may not be my only ability).

Second order of business: farside22 is almost certainly town. Iecerint - farside looks like an early townie fight right now. Glork needs further review.

Unvote, Vote: SocioPath

- not confident about this, but I don't have any better leads at this time.

[farside22]

Yeah, mafiawise, there aren't many people left who can call me junior, young'un.

*cough* looks at profile *cough*

[Glork]

Oh yeah, I'm pretty sure I'm a miller, too. One sec.

Yeah, that.

[UncertainKitten]

The First "Repetition" Vote Count

"Doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results is the very definition of insanity."

Mod Note: La de da, votecounts every page I can after this.

0. UncertainKitten (2): Kairyuu, Snow_Bunny
1. CSL (0)
2. StrangerCoug (1): bv310
3. SocioPath (1): Tarhalindur
4. farside22 (1): Iecerint
5. Glork (1): Glork
6. Leech (0)
7. Tarhalindur (2): SocioPath, Slicey
8. bv310 (0)
9. Kairyuu (0)
10. Iecerint (1): farside22
11. Slicey (0)
12. Snow_Bunny (0)

Not Voting (3): CSL, Leech, StrangerCoug

With 12 alive it takes 7 to lynch
Deadline is in ~13 days at 3:00 PM EST, Monday, May 17th, 2010

[Glork]

EBWOP: Actually, I don't think I'm a miller in its conventional form. I have to check something with the moderator.

[SocioPath]

Iec is doing what Iec does.
Misusing meta.
Obviously he is scum.

Vote: Iec

Now not counting!

[Glork]

Iec is doing what Iec does.
Misusing meta.
Obviously he is scum.

Vote: Iec

:bigredx:


Please revise and resubmit.

[farside22]

Oh yeah, I'm pretty sure I'm a miller, too. One sec.

Yeah, that.

Seriously? Why did you just sort of claim and in such a crap way after tar?

[Glork]

Because I kind of forgot the details of my role. Tar bringing up "millerness" reminded me that I had some miller aspect of my role, so I went and checked.

So I was like "yeah, I'm a miller." But as it turns out, after asking the mod something, I am not a miller towards investigative abilities. Sane investigations on me should get a sane result.

[farside22]

Iec is doing what Iec does.
Misusing meta.
Obviously he is scum.

Vote: Iec

Where are you getting this from?

Socio or tar need to change their avatars. I keep thinking it's the same person till I see the name.

Sociopath is currently unable to change his avatar as far as I know, due to a certain ongoing. I

think

Tar is free to, but he'd have to confirm that

[SocioPath]

UK is doing what Tar does.
Misusing meta.
Obviously he is scum.

Vote: SC

:bigredx:


Please revise and resubmit.

OH CRAP YOU ARE RIGHT.

Iec is doing what Iec does.
Misusing meta.
Obviously he is scum.

Vote: Glork

Totally not counting

[SocioPath]

Where are you getting this from?

From OS Mafia.
From FABLES Mafia.

DON'T QUESTION ME.

[Glork]

Question: Why do you persist in being wrong?

[SocioPath]

Wait a sec.
This is good.
Imma put this on hold for later.

[Iecerint]

1) stated that I made a comment calling your vote crap. Untrue
2) avoid answering question.
3) OMGUS vote that is unjustified thus far and still avoiding answering my orginal question about why Tar stood out amoung the 3.
4) bringing up an ongoing game that can not be discussed

1) is misrep IMO at this point; I have already explained why it looked to me like you thought the vote was crap. At best, you're splitting hairs by clearing thinking it was crap and complaining I'm saying you said it was crap.
2) Uh, I answered your question. To restate -- scum sometimes delay confirmation to extend pregame talk, so late confirmation, especially where there's a big gap, is a priori scummy.
3) I gave reasoning IMO. I still think it's good reasoning, too. I also explained why Tar stood out among those three, and you're quite aware of it because you go as far as to flat-out mention
4) which is somewhat naughty of you to do IMO.

I <3 Glorky.

[Iecerint]

SP, my vote for farside has 0% to do with her meta AFAIK.

[farside22]

1) stated that I made a comment calling your vote crap. Untrue
2) avoid answering question.
3) OMGUS vote that is unjustified thus far and still avoiding answering my orginal question about why Tar stood out amoung the 3.
4) bringing up an ongoing game that can not be discussed

1) is misrep IMO at this point; I have already explained why it looked to me like you thought the vote was crap. At best, you're splitting hairs by clearing thinking it was crap and complaining I'm saying you said it was crap.
2) Uh, I answered your question. To restate -- scum sometimes delay confirmation to extend pregame talk, so late confirmation, especially where there's a big gap, is a priori scummy.
3) I gave reasoning IMO. I still think it's good reasoning, too. I also explained why Tar stood out among those three, and you're quite aware of it because you go as far as to flat-out mention
4) which is somewhat naughty of you to do IMO.

I <3 Glorky.

1) it wasn't crap. I voted with a question
2) I feel like your missing my question. I noted Tar was not posting, you noted CSL why did you note CSL and not Tar? Why does bv get a free pass?
3) Really how is it justifed?
4) really I brought on an ongoing game first? I recall ignoring you trying to do so. Do I need to quote the reference?

[Iecerint]

1) "At best, you're splitting hairs by clearly having thought my vote was crap [cf. your counter-vote] while complaining that I said you said it was crap [which is vacuously true because you didn't EXPLICITLY say as much, even if your vote implies you thought so]." Does that edit make it make more sense? Too many pronouns, I think.

2) You have all the information you need to answer the first question. bv got a free pass for providing a plausible excuse for his late confirm. Also already stated.

3) I don't know what you mean. To justify the vote, I indicated why your behavior was more likely to come from scum than town (or, really, why it beats background probabilities).

4) I'm not playing dumb; I'm saying that your flagrant lampshading, especially with a tone capable of drawing a modkill, looks bad. No, I do not think you should address the issue further.

[Glork]

Protip: none of the rest of us care about your petty squabble. You both sound like you're trying to convince the other that they're scum, not the rest of us. Please end this pointless argument before it becomes even more of a distraction to the game.

[StrangerCoug]

Glork's bugging me. Right now I feel he's taking his spat with SocioPath the wrong way, and SocioPath comes off town to me, if frustrated.

Vote: Glork

Also, now that Tarhalindur reminded me, there's a miller aspect to my role, too. I do not counterclaim him since I expect this to be a bastard mod game (and that the first Insane Asylum game had more than one miller, too—I don't remember the exact number, but I think three), but since strategy is to bring this up as soon as possible, I'll throw it out there.

[Glork]

I wasn't aware that I had a spat with SP. I was just pointing out that voting for Iece is :badposting:.

In all fairness, the Iece/Farside thing did pretty much tell me that Iece is legit and farside has an above average chance of being legit. So in that respect it wasn't useless, but it doesn't need to continue.

[StrangerCoug]

That's a pretty strong statement to make on page three, Glork...

[farside22]

Glork's bugging me. Right now I feel he's taking his spat with SocioPath the wrong way, and SocioPath comes off town to me, if frustrated.

Vote: Glork

Also, now that Tarhalindur reminded me, there's a miller aspect to my role, too. I do not counterclaim him since I expect this to be a bastard mod game (and that the first Insane Asylum game had more than one miller, too—I don't remember the exact number, but I think three), but since strategy is to bring this up as soon as possible, I'll throw it out there.

I thought it was 2 and one fake claimed later. I was going to look later when I had a chance.

@Glork: Voting for yourself is helping how?

Iec: Continues to spout like I said crap as fact when he brings it up based on nothing at all. Exaggerates a question posted at him as apparently scummy.
And all his vote is comes off as OMGUS especially as his reason is

I think this is slightly scummy because it indicates an interest in finding a framework for voting someone more than reflection on whether said actions are scummy.

Typically with RVS I vote some person I know will make my life hell and watch for reaction.
I explain to Iec my vote and he still goes around saying I was saying he's vote was crap. Yeah it's complete misrep off of two post with 2 questions. Awesome stuff. Surprised at Glork's post the most.

[StrangerCoug]

Glork's bugging me. Right now I feel he's taking his spat with SocioPath the wrong way, and SocioPath comes off town to me, if frustrated.

Vote: Glork

Also, now that Tarhalindur reminded me, there's a miller aspect to my role, too. I do not counterclaim him since I expect this to be a bastard mod game (and that the first Insane Asylum game had more than one miller, too—I don't remember the exact number, but I think three), but since strategy is to bring this up as soon as possible, I'll throw it out there.

I thought it was 2 and one fake claimed later. I was going to look later when I had a chance.

That may be.