Wait up for my Zorblag case please.Nicodemus wrote:@ Llama: What do you think of UK and Zorblag?
I'm off to play badminton in a few minutes, so I don't have time right now, but it will be my priority next time I'm online.
Wait up for my Zorblag case please.Nicodemus wrote:@ Llama: What do you think of UK and Zorblag?
This really doesn’t feel like somebody hunting for scum.Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:##vote: Nicodemus
I think the Jack thing was/is a distraction from hunting scum and I'm suspicious of those who voted him bceause it seems like an easy vote for scum. I think even if Jack is a cult leader that DGB is right that Jack is an obvious target for any manner of PRs and hopefully a vig. Since Oj and Gama have actually contributed they're lower priorities leaving Nicodemus as the one who showed up, dropped a bad vote and scurried off.
which doesn't give a reason that I can see.Jack wrote:Fishy may be scum after all. I'm reading DGB's accusation of Zorblag. It's a tell I've never heard of and I don't see it. Yet I'm feeling no inclination to be suspicious of DGB for it.
##unvote
##Vote:Fishy
Not really, no. Like I said, it was just a feeling I got, nothing concrete. I'll let you know if the feeling keeps coming back though.UncertainKitten wrote:@Nico: Llama is pretty obvtown. Xvart is pretty obvscum, but VP is as well, and someone needs to keep on VP if he's ever to be lynched.
Also lol "feels off"
Plan on at least ATTEMPTING to justify that?
Fishythefish wrote:- No sign he’s thought about the actual chances of Jack being cult leader (very slim) – more like he’s parroting DGB.
It seems pretty freaking stupid for an actual anti-town cult leader or for scum to drive suspicion to themselves by talking about a cult leader from the word go. I don't think it's thus an unreasonable assumption to find Jack likelier to be town or at least neutral-other. Thus the people voting for him are voting a player who probably doesn't hurt the town win con under easy cover of "omg cult leader".Gammagooey wrote:DDD and to a lesser degree DGB again-Why would you leave a cult leader alive a day and let them get a recruit before killing them instead of lynching them before they have a chance to take someone down with them? And what good will PRs be on him except finding other possible members? I don't get your logic here.
Quick note: no time to fully explain this but you should know by now that I hate metaParama wrote:Anyone using meta to defend me is contradicting themself
Sorry, can't reread. Maybe you could quote the post where you pursued your suspicions of someone else before your "I like my vote right now, but I can certainly deal with a xvart lynch. " post.Gammagooey wrote:Jack-It's pretty great that you can't even read 4 posts back to see my question to DGB about Zor or look at my first two posts to see my reads on UK Llama and Zor, it really says a lot about how much actual thinking you're putting behind your votes.
Gammagooey wrote:DGB- I'll wait for the Zor case for the answer to this but why do you say he came in late? His first post was less than 12 hours after the game started and there's still people who haven't ever posted yet.
Gammagooey wrote:DDD Let's play a super awesome game.
Fill in the Blank.
Jack is town but completely ignoring questions multiple people have asked of him because ___________.
Gammagooey wrote:DDD and to a lesser degree DGB again-Why would you leave a cult leader alive a day and let them get a recruit before killing them instead of lynching them before they have a chance to take someone down with them? And what good will PRs be on him except finding other possible members? I don't get your logic here.