## Vote: Phate
Challenge accepted. I'll address other things plus UK's pouting fit later.
You can vote Phate and catch up later.Shotty to the Body wrote:I like how I make DGB's and Troll's scum list for being V/LA, only scum take finals! I'll have a catchup post for you guys by the end of the day.
Fine.DrippingGoofball wrote:You can vote Phate and catch up later.Shotty to the Body wrote:I like how I make DGB's and Troll's scum list for being V/LA, only scum take finals! I'll have a catchup post for you guys by the end of the day.
^this. That was the biggest load and I started laughing at the numbers too. I think other may have been the choice on the so called dice but yeah it was scummy.DrippingGoofball wrote:Next list update I have to put pops squarely in the scum category. He's telling us he chose scum and is making up some nebulous story about how he picked town against his own preference. To boot, he's especially eager to eliminate Jack the Cult Leader.
tsk tsk tskVP Baltar wrote:Parama 169 is ><. You're really bad at this game, aren't you?
The wiki isn't God. Taking everything to the literal meaning is stupid.VP Baltar wrote:Here's a cool example:Meanwhile, elsewhere:Parama wrote:OMGUS =/= Vote
OMGUS = overreacting to a vote like you did in your previous post and trying to attack the player who attacked you.Mafia Wiki wrote:OMGUS stands for "Oh My God, You Suck (for voting for me)!". it is sometimes used as a shorthand toindicate that you are voting for someone primarily because they voted for you.indicate that you are votingvoting
tsk tsk tskVP Baltar wrote:You should perhaps consider sometime that five or six months on site isn't all that much in the grand scheme of things.
You're implying that either one or the other is scum. You're saying that people who find both of us suspicious don't make sense.VP Baltar wrote:Implying you think we could be the same alignment? Haven't seen that from your play yet. But buzz words are fun.Parama wrote:Setting up a dichotomy I see.
Keep completely missing the point champ.VP Baltar wrote:Parama wrote:Quick note: no time to fully explain this but you should know by now that I hate metaI seriously don't get the town reads on him. Keep contradicting yourself champ.Parama's first sentence in this game wrote:Anyone who understands how I play knows my alignment.
ewww get off of me.Jack wrote:I was following you.farside22 wrote:*adds imagine to scum list*
I voted for Phate long time ago. The following from people on what DGB says is distrubing.
Upon reflection, I don't know what I was thinking with the active lurking. It just seemed like your posts were very big and said very little, but even that's not really the case. So yeah, I don't really know what I was thinking with that. I've since bumped you back to neutral.Zorblag wrote:@charter, it's interesting that your suspicion of me came apparently came right after Post 221 and that you're saying it's based on active lurking. Just so that I'm clear what you don't like, what is it that you think active lurking is? I don't mind it at all when people suspect me but that's an interesting reason for you to use.
I've played with him on three occasions if my memory serves me. His tunnelling isn't unexpected really, but generally speaking I've at least seen him tunnel for better reasons in the past. His attacks on me, much like Parama and UK, are laughable at best. That's what is annoying about him.Troll wrote:@VP Baltar, how much have you played with charter? This seems about what I expect from an opening for him.
First, it could not be any more clear than when I first said it. I'll quote it for you since you apparently can't remember:Uk wrote:Oh, right, and you've still never explained how I violated my own tell and decided to woohoo ignore the evidence I had against your fucking idiotic accusation.
Second, I don't know what "evidence" you provided against it when all I saw you say was:VP Baltar wrote:You sure about that? Only people I've voted have been you, who no one was voting for, and Para, who has scum juice leaking out of his eyes.UK wrote:@VP: I don't like your posting, and am ready to vote you given how pliable you been for basically any wagon that's occured.
Now, I mean, if we want to talk about someone trying to hedge bets for recent wagons:
That could be a good place to start. Using a scumtell you're guilty of to vote someone is reason to lynch you.UK wrote:##Unvote
##Vote: VPBaltar
##FoS: xvart
##FoS: Parama
##FoS: Jack
So, anytime you'd like to explain how I was pushing any wagon at that time when I only wanted to lynch you or Parama, feel free. You can also explain why that is a scumtell for me if it was true (which it's not) and not for you, who backed four major wagons in that same post.UK wrote:Contradiction of my own tells? What land are YOU coming from?
I read his post that his case was based on how his gut feeling on every post was off, then an afterthought of shallow logic. That's how it reads to me. When I build a case I start with the concrete and then would follow with "oh, and every post he makes I do not like."LlamaFluff wrote:So then he was scummy for the ordering, sound like if it was the other way around it would have been a null factor.
Yes, I was; although it was not because I was ignoring it.LlamaFluff wrote:You are ignoring the simplest answer still. It was a QT from a past game hydra. Are you honestly trying to argue that Eli tried to prove a point by quoting the scum QT in such a way that it could not have been accidental? They arent masons, they arent scum, they ARE both town. Let it go, you are wrong.
I've I've said countless times, I found it suspicious...LlamaFluff wrote:So its not a slip then? If you think they slipped, I would belive that you would be voting that over a read. Your choice of suspicions make no sense, apart from just trying to get the easier lynch through.
And how definite was your speculation?LlamaFluff wrote:Please... read between the lines. I looked at my role and immediately speculated on how many town players there are, and likely how many scum/other exist. How could speculating in this setup possibly be a tell?
Good to know. Thanks for answering for him.LlamaFluff wrote:This is actually somewhat along the lines of charter-town play.
Why did you use Mafia 89? Since your prefer mafia, but wanted to be random, why didn't you just randomly pick from 1, 2, or 3? Did you really think that your random setup would yield a stronger defense as opposed to the WIFOM you mention?popsofctown wrote:I figured some would be able to figure out my preference by meta. Since it didn't seem useful for me to WIFOM this (you thought I'd pick scum but I PICKED TOWN so now you are going to lynch me when... oh... crap....) I elected to go for the dice instead.
I used Mafia 89 Revenge. Generated a random number from 1 to 22. 1 to 3 were mafia, 4 was other, all other numbers were town. I got town.
I thought multiple wagons were pro-town?UncertainKitten wrote:Hi, why is there a Phate counterwagon to xvart scum? This is very telling ^-^.
Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:He displays utter oblivousness to a possible information role and only uses the "joking" assumption to try and back away from a bad situation when both possibilities should have been a consideration in the beginning.
I stand by this. I've never heard of an information role of that type before, one where the exact number of the scum team is revealed to a town-aligned player.Nicodemus wrote:No townie role, at least in my experience, could possibly give you any clue as to the exact number of scum in a game.
Does dreadful opinion = scummy?And then he ends the post by mischaracterizing IIoA as "too townie to be town" which is really just a dreadful opinion. Nico needs more votes.
Do you normally curse this much in-game UK?UncertainKitten wrote:@VP: Thanks for proving you're just a dick ^-^.
I reserve the right to ignore every post you make from now on until you get an attitude adjustment and also learn how to post in a readable format.
And also don't spend half a post on completely irrelevant shit.
Oh, right, and you've still never explained how I violated my own tell and decided to woohoo ignore the evidence I had against your fucking idiotic accusation.
Die.
I'll find a way to make sure you die. You most certainly deserve it.
Not much else to respond to,
This explanation. Man it stinks. It stinks even more when you look at the game in question and see that there were actually 5 scum, not 3. A fact that I would assume you were acquainted with since you were a part of the game. To me it looks like you fixed the numbers so that there was a higher perceived probability of you rolling town than there should have been, just to get us to trust your townness that much more.popsofctown wrote:I used Mafia 89 Revenge. Generated a random number from 1 to 22. 1 to 3 were mafia, 4 was other, all other numbers were town. I got town.