Well I will be giving the town the finger every day I am role blocked for keeping someone alive that is saying they did something good for the town and was tracked to someone that claimed to be role blocked. In my view they are just being dumb.Jack wrote:Farside, you will probably know what I'm thinking about if you claim "roleblocked" every night.
Pledge of Allegiance (Game Over! Page 76)
-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
@Gammagooey, my not liking people leaving of the Phate wagon when they did was my suspicion for the time. It's the sort of thing that will be much more useful to look at as the game goes along in terms of overall voting patterns; at that moment I'd said my bit. The one exception is farside22 who I did specifically like the reactions from which was useful immediately.
As for popsofctown's reaction I don't think that you're remembering it quite right. He didn't start by saying that we should watch out for DrippingGoofball because she did it without asking for a claim. That came 6 minutes later. He originally assumed that it went through and that DrippingGoofball was town and he could even see why she'd done it and then claimed for no good reason. Further he'd give some reads but he didn't have any (there's no talk about looking for them) and that we should probably keep pressuring xvart, a nice popular wagon.
It's a reaction that does nothing at all to help the town and doesn't show any of the surprise that I'd expect if he really believed it was true. I think it was fake. At the very least I'd expect some suspicion about whether it had really happened rather than absolute acceptance.
-Zorblag R`Lyeh-
-
Debonair Danny DiPietro Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5487
- Joined: January 21, 2009
- Location: Columbus, Ohio
I'm just baffled that the Fishy lynch has fallen apart like it has. He's been outed as a completely self-interested actor and while he claims to want to help the town there's obviously no evidence to support that other than his word. And Zorblag's idea is completely ridiculous, why would Fishy kill himself if we don't have the stones to lynch him now when he's already been incredibly deceptive, why not go back to day alive with either a chance to earn more mislynches if he's scum or an SK or to earn more points if he is indeed this "non-hostile" other.
Furthermore, if the wagon falls apart I have no idea how it isn't Nicodemus who isn't getting strung up. Ignoring his dreadful play from yesterday he then just blatantly rolefished today to try and completely out a PR whose claim has been verified by the person they claimed against.-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
I gain more points for a scum lynch than I lose for a town lynch. You do not have to worry about me keeping off lynch wagons.Zorblag wrote:If at this point we as a town want to lynch someone other than Fishythefish then I might have an alternate plan for him that would tie up a few things. I'm going to take it that most people believe his claim about both the one shot tracker/transmitter and the points. If I'm right that there aren't a lot of scum in this game then we don't actually want Fishythefish sticking around; I think he's a fair amount more likely to be on town lynches than scum lynches which hurts his faction in terms of points so I suspect that he'll be a bit more likely than town to simply try to stay off lynches as a whole which isn't something we really want.
On the other hand, we've got a claimed PGO. It seems to me that it might be acceptable to those who still want the Fishythefish lynch that we have him target Gammagooey with a track and whoever he thinks is most likely to be town with his transmit. His death should verify Gammagooey's claim (or not) and we'll potentially get tracking information (at least whether or not he targets anyone) on Gammagooey that I imagine trackers would be somewhat reluctant to get on their own. Whoever receives the transmission doesn't even have to worry about sharing it as they're not revealing anything about their role. Fishythefish should find that a much better deal than just getting lynched today so it should be an all around win for town and his claimed non-hostile other faction. It'll also give us a fair amount more useful information to work with.
Unsurprisingly, my firm order of preference is
Alive>Visiting a PGO>Being lynched
This is the order that is in the interests of both the town and my faction.-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
No. If there is a way to confirm my action, which I'm not claiming either way, I judge it not worth outing the action to stay alive. You are unlikely to ever have confirmation of who I visited last night, or what I did there.Gammagooey wrote:MMMMMMmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm hey fishy you said the track would be sent to someone, did the ability you used last night's result get sent to someone who could confirm that it isn't a roleblock?
In answer to your last question: I AM NOT TOWN. In claiming, my interests are not the same as yours, and I refuse to do what is best for the town. In virtually all other matters, our interests directly align. In this game, not being town is not a sufficient reason to lynch someone. See my recent long post - iso 37.farside22 wrote:Listen up people. He didn't say he did anything last night. That is withholding information. That is not town.
He went to Red Coyote and even if that is not his intended target he still did something last night that he is not telling people.
HOW IS THIS TOWN?
See iso 37 again. I lied. I've got no intention of ever claiming the action I used last night. It would hurt my partner(s) (and yeah, I decided in iso 37 it was worth admitting they exist) by removing their claim.Chronopie wrote:So what's your opinion on the Targeting matter?
First he claimed he didn't, now it's clear he did.
I have an objection! The dogma that you cannot trust me because I don't share exactly the same interests as you fails in this game. 90+% of the time, we want the same thing. The last 10-% is when I claim (and some rather unlikely scenarios involving idiocy from other points factions)Chronopie wrote:Town Cop says Fishy is not-town
Fishy claims other with one shot trackerThat they hadn't used
Tracker says Fishy visited RC
RC admits being RB'd
Fishy admits visiting someone,Not RC. Therefore Lied about not using ability.
But Fishy doesn't want to say who they visited, or what ability.
Therefore we cannot trust Fishy.
--
Any objections to that analysis? Thoughts?
Absolutely I'm a completely self-interested actor. Lucky for the town our interests align virtually all the time. You (presumably) implicitly claim you want to help the town, and there's obviously no evidence to support that other than your word. That is not a point against me unless I have given you reason to think I don't want to hurt the town.Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:I'm just baffled that the Fishy lynch has fallen apart like it has. He's been outed as a completely self-interested actor and while he claims to want to help the town there's obviously no evidence to support that other than his word. And Zorblag's idea is completely ridiculous, why would Fishy kill himself if we don't have the stones to lynch him now when he's already been incredibly deceptive, why not go back to day alive with either a chance to earn more mislynches if he's scum or an SK or to earn more points if he is indeed this "non-hostile" other.
Furthermore, if the wagon falls apart I have no idea how it isn't Nicodemus who isn't getting strung up. Ignoring his dreadful play from yesterday he then just blatantly rolefished today to try and completely out a PR whose claim has been verified by the person they claimed against.
I think I agree with you on Nico. Given the unexpectedly warm reception to my claims, I'll be taking a good look at some players tonight.-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8036
- Joined: October 19, 2008
- Location: Houston, TX
Whatever. An action that you're not willing to disclose that just so happened to turn out to be a roleblock.Fishy 735 wrote:I'm pretty sure I did. At any rate, I do now. I did not use any power last night that would lead to you (or anyone) being blocked.
---
Oh, yeah, there's a threat. "Claim now or if we happen to investigate you may get lynched!"Plum 759 wrote:In fact, if you're Part of the Executive, Legislative, or Judicial branches please claim now. If you're pro-Town-type Other, as Fishy claims he is, you'll be doing the Town overall a favor, even though you might not want to claim. You have another incentive: You don't claim now, well, there's at least one and possibly more investigative PRs who will assume you to be hostile if they get a non-Town, or even an Other result on you, should you not claim immediately.
Like how farside investigated Fishy?
I want to know how many of these players who are unvoting Fishy and talking down his lynch happen to be part of these third party groups trying to circle the wagons.
---
This is the analysis I get too, Chrono. My impression is that the mindset behind ignoring Fishy is that the town can use these players in some way, although everyone has been vauge about how that's going to work, and that we shouldn't focus our attention on third parties. To that I say, no one here is saying that we need to focus on any Judicial/Executive/Legislative roles, but, rather, focus on those players who are just not town period. Especially if they are running around using random actions on everyone.Chrono 760 wrote:Town Cop says Fishy is not-town
Fishy claims other with one shot trackerThat they hadn't used
Tracker says Fishy visited RC
RC admits being RB'd
Fishy admits visiting someone, Not RC. Therefore Lied about not using ability.
But Fishy doesn't want to say who they visited, or what ability.
Therefore we cannot trust Fishy.
---
I was told that I didn't get any result for my investigation.farside 767 wrote:Red Coyote: Did you receive or get anything else beside being told you were Role Blocked?
---
pops, I'm just giving you a yes or no question here. I was under the impression you were more or less suckered into claiming VT by DGB. Is this true or not? If it's true, why not just post your VT win con as it shows on the rules post of the game, and if it isn't, then why do I think you are a VT?pops 771 wrote:I paraphrased because I assumed my wincon boiled down to what the townie wincon always is, but technically if you nitpick the wording, if the last three living players were a lyncher who had already killed his target and two vanilla townies some townies would be declared winners and the dead lyncher target would be considered a loser. This kind of turns the town into a coalition of Survivors and is bad design and I'm hoping the wincon phrasing was just an oversight.
---
Maybe I'm just being unsophisticated, but I agree with farside here. I don't really get how the town expects to win if there are a lot of "non-hostile" entities with some supposedly nondescript action that may or may not wittingly be roleblocking town PRs. I mean, what is there to take advantage of here? I don't think those advocating a lynch on Fishy are asking the town to ignore scum or "hostile" third parties, but you do lynch whomever is running contrary to the town's best interests.farside 800 wrote:Well I will be giving the town the finger every day I am role blocked for keeping someone alive that is saying they did something good for the town and was tracked to someone that claimed to be role blocked. In my view they are just being dumb.
---
I can support this. I can support a lot of lynches, actually, over Zorblag at the moment. I like his contributions and I really don't get where this idea that DGB can simply say, "I know he's not town because I know all about him", and that's what flies.DDD 802 wrote:Furthermore, if the wagon falls apart I have no idea how it isn't Nicodemus who isn't getting strung up. Ignoring his dreadful play from yesterday he then just blatantly rolefished today to try and completely out a PR whose claim has been verified by the person they claimed against.-
-
Jack Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5460
- Joined: August 13, 2006
Here's the thing about these "pick your..." games. People do funny things that you wouldn't predict. For kicks I ran a 7 player pick your power, and a 7 player pick your side on another site. In the pyp, 4 townies went for the same power, and in the pys, 3 went for other and none for scum.
So if you are zoraster, and a TON of people pick other, what would you do? You simply can't make them all SK's. The original pm said we would either be "town, mafia, or other". The actual setup is "town, mafia, other:hostile, other:non-hostile, unknown". This says to me that a bunch of people picked other. Probably there is some reason for it. Perhaps fishy can tell us why he picked other. Perhaps the thought of being on a scum team with unknown partners, going up against possibly multiple scum groups was off putting. Or maybe everyone who likes town picked town, and everyone who likes mafia knew that people know they like mafia, and didn't want to pick it.
Fact is, xvart's flip and the details from Fishy's claim make it likely that there is some side game going on with the non-hostile's. I've played in games with side quests for other factions. I think the best play is to go for out and out mafia.
The PGO is a decent solution, although realistically Fishy will only do it if he thinks he will be lynched the next day for not doing it. I think though, that even I would be fully behind a fishy lynch if we had told him to do it and he didn't.-
-
Jack Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5460
- Joined: August 13, 2006
-
-
popsofctown SheSurvivorShe
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12356
- Joined: September 23, 2008
- Pronoun: She
Well excuse me for forgoing the literal yes/no interpretation of the question "Are you a VT like you claimed two pages ago?" and assuming you wouldn't ask a redundant question, Red.RedCoyote wrote:
pops, I'm just giving you a yes or no question here. I was under the impression you were more or less suckered into claiming VT by DGB. Is this true or not? If it's true, why not just post your VT win con as it shows on the rules post of the game, and if it isn't, then why do I think you are a VT?
When asked the question I answered with the gist of my wincon. I didn't bother with going to the rules post or opening my role pm which is hidden in a sea of pms because I'm very popular. I only now realize that there may be any distinction between the answer I gave and the wincon in my role pm.
Of course, what's rather fascinating is that you said "hey, don't you have the wincon posted here in the first post" and not, "hey, that's not the wincon in my role pm".
---
Look, if zoraster PMed me and said "tonight, you can vig someone, but only if it's fishy, wannadoit?" I would absolutely vig fishy. But stray roleblocks hitting town PRs (and scum PRs and designated killers too) is not nearly as worthy of the lynch as players whom must die before we win the game, who kill us every night, who very well may also have roleblocks. I mean, it's like you have a six shot revolver and you're being attacked by four raccoons and five bears. The bears are more dangerous by orders of magnitude, and you need to shoot them first. And if you shoot one raccoon first, what if you miss the bears with your other five shots? You're hosed.RedCoyote wrote:
Maybe I'm just being unsophisticated, but I agree with farside here. I don't really get how the town expects to win if there are a lot of "non-hostile" entities with some supposedly nondescript action that may or may not wittingly be roleblocking town PRs. I mean, what is there to take advantage of here? I don't think those advocating a lynch on Fishy are asking the town to ignore scum or "hostile" third parties, but you do lynch whomever is running contrary to the town's best interests.farside 800 wrote:Well I will be giving the town the finger every day I am role blocked for keeping someone alive that is saying they did something good for the town and was tracked to someone that claimed to be role blocked. In my view they are just being dumb.-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
@RC: if all I wanted was not to be caught roleblocking, I could have claimed any number of roles. The fact that I haven't claimed a specific role is a silly reason to think I'm lying about that.
Focusing on players who aren't town sounds very noble. Unfortunately, it's a sure route to defeat if you don't discriminate between those who have been put in this game do balance it back in the town's favour and the others.
I'm no danger to this town, except in very unlikely scenarios. Lynching me seems kind of clean - get rid of anything that isn't town - but there are probably 4 more like me out there. You do not have 5 lynches to throw away on these people, some of whom are for all practical purposes (other than claiming) protown.
Sure. I've never been other, and wanted to see what it was like. The answer is "stressful if you get investigated by two PRs".Jack wrote:Perhaps fishy can tell us why he picked other.-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8036
- Joined: October 19, 2008
- Location: Houston, TX
Oh, wait, so the plan is to force Fishy to visit the PGO then? I must've missed where this was proposed. This is perfect, and I feel like I just spent half and hour making a post for nothing.Jack 806 wrote:The PGO is a decent solution, although realistically Fishy will only do it if he thinks he will be lynched the next day for not doing it. I think though, that even I would be fully behind a fishy lynch if we had told him to do it and he didn't.
##Unvote
##Vote: Jack
---
Okay, okay. You're popular; I can definitely buy that.pops 808 wrote:When asked the question I answered with the gist of my wincon. I didn't bother with going to the rules post or opening my role pm which is hidden in a sea of pms because I'm very popular. I only now realize that there may be any distinction between the answer I gave and the wincon in my role pm.
Of course, what's rather fascinating is that you said "hey, don't you have the wincon posted here in the first post" and not, "hey, that's not the wincon in my role pm".
Actually, because it deviated from my role PM is the only reason why it caught me a bit off guard. I actually went back and checked on it at both places (PM + Mod's opening post) to make sure mine wasn't any different from the VT. Anyways, consider it dropped.-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
Right. This is bad.
I have just realised there may be good reasons why I can't or shouldn't visit the PGO tonight. I need to commune with the mod and my partner(s) on this - it might be absolutely fine, depending on some stuff. But it's possible I'd rather be lynched than visit him; and it's even possible I'd rather be lynched than tell you why that is.
Expect more asap.-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
-
-
d3x Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3553
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: Burbank, CA
##UnVote
I completely follow farside's line of thinking, but I gotta say I believe Fishy's Claim. It reads right and if the theory that there are a lot of Others out there {leaving fewer more powerful Scum and Town}, I'm not surrised we have a Bus Driver. Given it's selfserving what with the building Wagon, but it would appear Fishy loses out on the chance of gaining points by Claiming. That lends it credibility, imo.
Llama749- The Gambler's Fallacy again? While I agree with most of your reads there, why is charter obvTown?
Ellibereth776- Why is the xvart Wagon more likely to have Scum/Others than the Fishy Wagon?
@Jack776, 779, 790- What's with the sudden bout of Vote jumping? Also, why wait this long to put together a case on me? You've apparently found me scummy for a while, what makes now special? You have no new 'evidence' in your case. Is it because Llama started with a Vote on me? Also, how is the QT thing on you an easy mislynch? I asked you to give more details on an apparent lie that you threw out. You never followed up on it with anyting and continued dodging questions about it. And how is my 'player vs player' experiment not 'real analysis'? I offered to go into more detail for anyone who asked. No one asked. Thus my breakdown of Voting you was ultimately unquestioned.
@Jack806- Going ~24hrs without posting is Lurking now? Tell you what, I'm not going to post within every 24 hours, so don't bother asking. I've got work, family, and drinking to take up my time.
In other news... I'm holding my Vote for the moment, but it'll probably end up on Jack.-
-
StrangerCoug He/HimDoes not ComputeHe/Him
- Does not Compute
- Does not Compute
- Posts: 12457
- Joined: May 6, 2008
- Pronoun: He/Him
- Location: San Antonio, Texas
If that is true, then I missed this.UncertainKitten wrote:It was pretty obvious they weren't attacking each other in the sense they thought each other to be scum.STRANGERCOUG: Stranger Than You!
Current avatar by PurryFurry of FurAffinity.
What Were You Thinking XV! is in progress.-
-
Jack Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5460
- Joined: August 13, 2006
Do you think this discredits any argument I make against you?d3x wrote:@Jack776, 779, 790- What's with the sudden bout of Vote jumping?
Do you think this discredits any argument I make against you?Also, why wait this long to put together a case on me? You've apparently found me scummy for a while, what makes now special?You have no new 'evidence' in your case. Is it because Llama started with a Vote on me?
Do you think this discredits any argument I make against you?
Also, how is the QT thing on you an easy mislynch? I asked you to give more details on an apparent lie that you threw out. You never followed up on it with anyting and continued dodging questions about it.
Yeah, "apparent lies" are easier to question that actually trying to scumhunt.
Yes. That was exactly my point. You were unwilling to do the work, so you posted a bare bones deal, but you realized that it might look bad so you offered to go into more detail if anyone asked. If anyone had asked you could write something about that bit.And how is my 'player vs player' experiment not 'real analysis'? I offered to go into more detail for anyone who asked. No one asked. Thus my breakdown of Voting you was ultimately unquestioned.
You've said zip all day.@Jack806- Going ~24hrs without posting is Lurking now? Tell you what, I'm not going to post within every 24 hours, so don't bother asking. I've got work, family, and drinking to take up my time.-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
Is everyone missing the fact that Fishy admits to having partners? Do you really think he is going to go visit a PGO?
You people are smoking crack.
He did something last night. Doesn't want to say what it is and to me it's not obviously pro-town.
He is not part of the town.
*mutters pissy comments to the town people*Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.-
-
zoraster He/HimDisorganized CrimeHe/Him
- Disorganized Crime
- Disorganized Crime
- Posts: 21680
- Joined: June 10, 2008
- Pronoun: He/Him
- Location: Belmont, CA
-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
Why would saying what I did make any difference? Would you really care which of the huge number of roles out there I claimed, or who I visited?farside22 wrote:Is everyone missing the fact that Fishy admits to having partners? Do you really think he is going to go visit a PGO?
You people are smoking crack.
He did something last night. Doesn't want to say what it is and to me it's not obviously pro-town.
He is not part of the town.
*mutters pissy comments to the town people*
The fact that I'm part of the town cannot in this game be a reason to autolynch me.
What's the relevance of me having partners?
Anyway, time to make things worse: Iwill notvisit the PGO tonight. The reason is that, as I claimed originally, the transmitting track is of great points value to my faction. It needs to go to a townie, and that could easily be the difference between me winning and losing the game. Tonight, we have two nearly confirmed townies - from the two reports on me. That makes our chances of transmitting to a townie who lives through the night higher than they are likely to be again. If I agree to visit the PGO, I'm a scum roleblocker magnet. Not only will this get me lynched tomorrow, it will also make it significantly less likely that my faction transmits successfully to a townie. I'd much rather get lynched today and get those points than get lynched tomorrow and not.-
-
UncertainKitten Maid In Japan
- Maid In Japan
- Maid In Japan
- Posts: 6339
- Joined: December 1, 2009
- Location: Virginia
DING DING DING!Jack wrote:Note that xvart is specifically "Speaker of the housepart ofthe legislature". Indicating that he is part of a faction.
I would almost guarantee that mafia are either trying to ride this "lynch non-hostiles" horse as far as they can, or lurking like d3x to see how it turns out.
And guess who's pushing that really, REALLY, hard right now?
OhYEAH, Red Coyote! HOW DISTURBING!
Oh Hai RC, why did you vote Jack again?
@SC: Well, yeah, you have to say that now, or else you admit you're scum .
@farside: If he DOESN'T visit the PGO, he gets lynched, now doesn't he?
His credibility is lower than gamma's.
Ah, cool, Troll is at L-5
##Unvote, ##Vote Troll"Never have I seen anybody glorify their own lynch."
-StrangerCoug
Internet Mafiais probably never going to happen. You all probably knew that.-
-
UncertainKitten Maid In Japan
- Maid In Japan
- Maid In Japan
- Posts: 6339
- Joined: December 1, 2009
- Location: Virginia
Hmm...what to do about Fishy now...his post came right before I posted mine...
If heisa non hostile other I feel we'd be wasting a lynch when we have SO MANY other better targets that might actually be hostile to us..."Never have I seen anybody glorify their own lynch."
-StrangerCoug
Internet Mafiais probably never going to happen. You all probably knew that.-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
@Fishythefish, I'm not sure what you think the problem is here.
If you're telling the truth why would scum bother roleblocking an action that's going to eliminate someone who would be working against them otherwise? Scum shouldn't care whether your faction wins the point game or not should they? I'm very skeptical that you'd be a prime candidate for a roleblock.
Further, I've checked with the mod and confirmed that one shot abilities, if roleblocked, can be used again unless there's some specific mechanic that prevents it. Do you know of some such mechanic in this case? For your statement to make sense it must be a factional ability (otherwise, if you got lynched today your faction wouldn't be able to use it) so even if for whatever reason you did get roleblocked your partner(s) would still be able to use it later.
@Debonair Danny DiPietro and farside22, you seem to misunderstand the point of my plan. If the town isn't willing to lynch Fishythefish today then we should be doing something like telling him to target a PGO tonight whether or not he's going to do it. If he does then great, issue dealt with. If he doesn't then the rest of the town has lost their reason to trust him and should drop their unwillingness to lynch. Of course, if he's refusing to go along with the plan without giving objections that make sense then we should be able to go back to lynching him today.
-Zorblag R`Lyeh-
-
Fishythefish Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4362
- Joined: November 2, 2008
- Location: England
I'd be roleblocked in order to get me lynched tomorrow because of non-compliance - the effect that I wouldn't get to do the action would be an unimportant side effect. I think that would make me an extremely attractive target.Zorblag wrote: @Fishythefish, I'm not sure what you think the problem is here.
If you're telling the truth why would scum bother roleblocking an action that's going to eliminate someone who would be working against them otherwise? Scum shouldn't care whether your faction wins the point game or not should they? I'm very skeptical that you'd be a prime candidate for a roleblock.
Further, I've checked with the mod and confirmed that one shot abilities, if roleblocked, can be used again unless there's some specific mechanic that prevents it. Do you know of some such mechanic in this case? For your statement to make sense it must be a factional ability (otherwise, if you got lynched today your faction wouldn't be able to use it) so even if for whatever reason you did get roleblocked your partner(s) would still be able to use it later.
As I've claimed before, it is a factional ability. The reason it's important to use it tonight is that tonight we can pretty well guarantee sending it to a town player. That probably won't be true any other night.-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
He said he won't, we should probably end him. I wasn't really that impressed with the troll case earlier so looking at where the wagons stand now I'll go with the fishy lynch.
Unvote vote fishy"By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest." -Confucius
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.