Mini 945: Mafia in Bawlmer - GAME OVER

[Cyberbob]

CyberBob - Why would you be down with lynching me? Do you no longer feel Neto is attempting to buddy you up?

I'm voting for you because I didn't like your exchange with Netopalis one bit; his reasons for being inactive are believable (especially if he was inactive sitewide rather than just in this one game) and there isn't a whole lot else to fall back on. I'd be up for lynching you because I feel like you're reaching pretty terribly against him on top of the other things that have been brought up about you.

[Dizzle]

Has my terrible reaching nullified Neto's buddying?

[Cyberbob]

Yes. A buddying call is almost always a fair bit more nebulous than a reaching call, and this case is no exception.

[Ythan]

Dizzle wants you to know that he's not the

scummiest

player in the game.

[Dizzle]

Dizzle wants you to know that he's not the

scummiest

player in the game.

Nope, just wondering what happened to his top scum read.

ML/SC - What are your thoughts on the way this lynch seems to be going?

[Amished]

V/LA until Sunday night. Play nice, if a lynch happens send any/all night actions in to me and NO POSTING.

I will not tolerate vote shenanigans during this period. If you even separate a "vote: xxxx" without bolding; I will count it. THIS IS YOUR OFFICIAL WARNING.

Deadline for the Night will be approximately 80 hours from the lynch (giving 8 hours for a "day" where I normally couldn't check the thread to lock it and 72 for the typical night deadline)

[MacavityLock]

ML/SC - What are your thoughts on the way this lynch seems to be going?

Well, I'm not interested in lynching you at this juncture, but it's not my job to defend you either. I've made my cases against the people I am interested in lynching today, and neither has responded in any meaningful manner. Neto didn't respond at all, just riffed on my xvart-case. xvart responded to only one of my many points.

[Ythan]

Diz, why are you asking those two specific players?

[StrangerCoug]

ML/SC - What are your thoughts on the way this lynch seems to be going?

You're not my top pick, but I see the case on you.

[Dizzle]

Diz, why are you asking those two specific players?

Well, I pretty much knew how the other 4 players felt about it because they had all weighed in.

[Cyberbob]

I'm bored. People need to lay some votes down or at least get more proactive in pursuing their reads, scum have absolutely every motivation to make things as slow and boring as possible and the best counter to this is to make it not slow and not boring

[StrangerCoug]

Seven people can't come to a consensus. This is ridiculous. Why aren't xvart and Netopalis dead?

[MacavityLock]

I've made my cases against the people I am interested in lynching today, and neither has responded in any meaningful manner. Neto didn't respond at all, just riffed on my xvart-case. xvart responded to only one of my many points.

I'm waiting with bated breath for any real response.

[xvart]

Going to see Iron Man 2. I'll post when I return.

xvart.

[xvart]

Was he trying to set up some sort of mislynch via an unlikely dram-miller kill?

Who is the "he" that is trying to setup some sort of mislynch? Me? A mafia member?

Was it really needed so soon?

Yes, as I assumed you agreed with since you were voting for a lack of content, and his next post provided no content.

Additionally, xvart's Chevre vote was L-1 and a direct follow of Cyberbob, and didn't even point out L-1-ness or request a claim.

I can't respond to this because I can't remember; whenever I put someone at L-1 I always tell them to claim. I can't remember ever voting to L-1 without asking so maybe I didn't realize it was L-1. But I'm typically fairly careful about voting so I just don't know.

xvart.

[MacavityLock]

Was he trying to set up some sort of mislynch via an unlikely dram-miller kill?

Who is the "he" that is trying to setup some sort of mislynch? Me? A mafia member?

Yes, this is in reference to you. If you are a maf, it would seem a reasonable tactic to make the unlikely dram-miller kill, and then use that kill to attempt to set up mislynches by looking at who dram suspected.

Was it really needed so soon?

Yes, as I assumed you agreed with since you were voting for a lack of content, and his next post provided no content.

There was one post and less than an hour between luke's vanilla claim and your hammer. I know that a vanilla claim doesn't often change much, but the whole operation was very fast.

Now, I wanted him lynched too; he was clearly scummy. But I don't see why you were in such a rush to hammer.

Additionally, xvart's Chevre vote was L-1 and a direct follow of Cyberbob, and didn't even point out L-1-ness or request a claim.

I can't respond to this because I can't remember; whenever I put someone at L-1 I always tell them to claim. I can't remember ever voting to L-1 without asking so maybe I didn't realize it was L-1. But I'm typically fairly careful about voting so I just don't know.

Your vote was the L-1 on Chevre, and it did not include a request to claim. See posts 371 and 383 to check.

[xvart]

Now, I wanted him lynched too; he was clearly scummy. But I don't see why you were in such a rush to hammer.

I didn't see a reason to wait since I agreed, you agreed, and a majority of the town had agreed.

Your vote was the L-1 on Chevre, and it did not include a request to claim. See posts 371 and 383 to check.

No kidding? Isn't that exactly what I just explained? Or is this one of those times that by keep asking the same questions makes the person look scummier?

xvart.

[MacavityLock]

Now, I wanted him lynched too; he was clearly scummy. But I don't see why you were in such a rush to hammer.

I didn't see a reason to wait since I agreed, you agreed, and a majority of the town had agreed.

Still seems unnecessarily quick.

Your vote was the L-1 on Chevre, and it did not include a request to claim. See posts 371 and 383 to check.

No kidding? Isn't that exactly what I just explained? Or is this one of those times that by keep asking the same questions makes the person look scummier?

Wasn't a question. I was just confirming that that was what happened, since you "can't remember" even though you're "typically fairly careful about voting".

[Amished]

Votecount 4.4?

Dizzle (3): xvart, Cyberbob, Ythan
xvart (2): StrangerCoug, MacavityLock
Netopalis (1): Dizzle
MacavityLock (1): Netopalis

Not voting (0):

With 7 alive it takes 4 to lynch.

Deadline for Day 4 is May 19th.

[Dizzle]

Now, I wanted him lynched too; he was clearly scummy. But I don't see why you were in such a rush to hammer.

I didn't see a reason to wait since I agreed, you agreed, and a majority of the town had agreed.

A majority found luke's actions scummy enough to warrant a vote but I'd doubt all those voters wanted him lynched so quickly. Given luke's activity level, he may not have offered us much more. However, he should have had the opportunity to properly defend himself and we should have had the opportunity to discuss the situation. Anyway, getting to be about that time where it's lynch or be lynched.

Unvote

Vote: xvart

[Ythan]

Dizzle or xvart...I'll take a look.

[Amished]

Just to be clear, the deadline is going to be about 48 hours from this post.

[Ythan]

Yeah I don't like Diz's lynch or be lynched vote. At all actually.

[Ythan]

You know what actually, scratch that. Assuming for a moment that he is town (and knows 100% that he is town), it's not anti-town at all unless I'm mistaken. Still want him dead enough to leave my vote though.

[Cyberbob]

Why do I get the feeling that this is going to end in a No Lynch?