Vote: Faraday
Read him in iso.
Faraday seems unable to take a stance in the game and reminds me of the play of my scumbuddy in a newbie game who pretty much lurked through the entire damn thing without taking any sort of stance except bussing me. He seems to definitely be coasting the game and he's the only player who I don't have a read on.
Faraday wrote:Ugh I'm leaning towards BV being a VI more than scum at the moment. I think Richard's scummier, and more likely to be scum than Bv who (no offense) seems to play like this every game from a couple of his games I've read.
If Faraday flips scum, this is pretty good evidence of Esp's innocence right here.Faraday wrote:I think Espeonage is more likely to be scum than Sando at this venture.
These next two quotes are days apart but I find them noteworthy because they both comment on the same window of posts. I'll explain why once you see the quotes.
Faraday wrote:Amished's case on Seraphim is quite good, and I can buy that. I found seraphime's early game behaviour noteworthy. Essentially his exaggerations reluctance on who to vote, it loooked fake at the time and I think it makes a lot of sense from Seraphim scum POV.
I'm not sure what changed here. So I'd like an explanation. A lot of Amished's initial case on me revolves around the same window so I'm not sure what changed between then and now.Faraday wrote:I don't see Sera as the most likeliest candidate for scum atm.
He's quite vehment and constant with his BV hate once he does jump on. I did think he was playing both sides of the fence with his 'I reaaaaaally wanna vote bv' early on in the game, but I'm not sure that's the type of thing he'd post if he was buddies with Bv, I know it's not something I'd ever do with a scumbuddy, that's for sure, so I think looking back it's more likely he did find them both genuinely scummy as opposed to making sure he could be seen to be suspicious of Bv.