Mini 974: Thrillville Mafia - Over


User avatar
Super Smash Bros. Fan
Super Smash Bros. Fan
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Super Smash Bros. Fan
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1746
Joined: March 25, 2010

Post Post #50 (ISO) » Mon May 17, 2010 11:30 am

Post by Super Smash Bros. Fan »

CryMeARiver wrote:
Super Smash Bros. Fan wrote:A few of you are overreacting a bit too much, especially CryMeARiver, Timeater, and Andrius. Less fully caps word, more content posts.
CryMeARiver wrote:Question to everyone: Should we post which we voted for or not and why?
I disagree with this. I rather keep this a surprise so we don't ruin it. But seriously, discussing gameplay mechanics isn't really going to get us much results. I saw the argument and it hasn't really been too productive.
CryMeARiver wrote:Do you have any town reads yet?
Not yet. Will change as the game goes on.
CryMeARiver wrote:Do you enjoy short walks on the beach?
Why are you dubious and does that make me expect you to be scummy?
Why do you eat Tim and then deny him the respect of admitting it?
CryMeARiver, three out of the four questions you asked here contribute nothing to the game. Hell, the last two made absolutely no sense and the last question sounds like an attempt to hide RVS in a question, which does not fool me.

Now I'd like to ask you people a question. Are you getting any sort of scummy reads on anyone?

I have a slightly scummy read on CryMeARiver already.

With that said,
Vote: CryMeARiver


And it's not because of those mostly unproductive questions. It's because you're the main force of this discussion that will not benefit us in the long run. RVS fine, even good when ulitized well, but this discussion is going to get nowhere pretty quick.
CryMeARiver wrote:Small scum read on SlySly
Explain why SlySly is slightly scummy to you. So far, out of all of the no reads/null reads/scum reads I have, he's the closest to a town read.
User avatar
Super Smash Bros. Fan
Super Smash Bros. Fan
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Super Smash Bros. Fan
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1746
Joined: March 25, 2010

Post Post #51 (ISO) » Mon May 17, 2010 11:33 am

Post by Super Smash Bros. Fan »

(faceplam)

Why did I quote that first post? How idiotic of me.

The latter one is the one that you should read, thought.
User avatar
Andrius
Andrius
The Baker
User avatar
User avatar
Andrius
The Baker
The Baker
Posts: 12806
Joined: February 16, 2010

Post Post #52 (ISO) » Mon May 17, 2010 11:37 am

Post by Andrius »

CMAR wrote: Question to everyone: Should we post which we voted for or not and why?
I don't mind either way. I don't see how it could help us out, right off the bat, but if someone presents a good case I'll go for it. Then again, I don't remember what I did vote for, so I'd have to check.
"This is the true face of a man who plays paladin."
User avatar
CryMeARiver
CryMeARiver
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
CryMeARiver
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3460
Joined: January 6, 2010

Post Post #53 (ISO) » Mon May 17, 2010 11:44 am

Post by CryMeARiver »

Super Smash Bros. Fan wrote:(faceplam)

Why did I quote that first post? How idiotic of me.

The latter one is the one that you should read, thought.
LOL, I just realized you were SSBF and not Flava Flave.

Small scum read on SlySly for two reasons:
I still find his Page 1 stuff on the answers kind of fishy -
SlySly wrote:Didn't we already have to send a vote in with the confirmation? If so, all you guys votes are invalid since you didn't unvote, unless, of course, you voted for the same person you sent with you confirmation.

I voted for topless female ride attendants under 115lbs.
SlySly wrote:
animorpherv1 wrote:
That was a vote to see what role enters the game. Game continues as normally in the day.
Whale crap.
animorpherv1 wrote:
Sly, you did it right. Now continue playing this game as you normally eould.
SlySly wrote:I sent 1, thinking that is who I was voting for to be lynched. So I don't know if that person is now having my vote considered to be the (Macho/Normal) Cop or the (Neutered/Normal) Doc.
SlySly wrote:I sent in my choice for roles to enter the game along with one name of which I thought was being sent for a lynch.
Try to follow that and see what you get out of it.

Also, my second reason (as well as my answer to this question):
Andrius wrote:
CMAR wrote: Question to everyone: Should we post which we voted for or not and why?
I don't mind either way. I don't see how it could help us out, right off the bat, but if someone presents a good case I'll go for it. Then again, I don't remember what I did vote for, so I'd have to check.
is that think about it.
A town player would want a cop that is able to be protected by a doctor no matter what. No one knows what a "Macho Cop" entices except that it can't be protected by a doc. I don't see why ANY town would vote 1 unless they just weren't thinking. Therefore, SlySly voting 1 is rather scummy to me. Just realized my vote wasn't on him anymore
Vote: SlySly

Think about it. A cop would be scared to come out with a guilty, because what if a doc can't protect him and he just dies? I don't see why someone would vote 1. Hence, obviously, I voted 2.
Show
You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.


"postgame i'm going to pee on you gandalf

pee on you" - Chesskid

V/LA (No access) from July 8th - July 14th


CMAR :cop:
User avatar
CryMeARiver
CryMeARiver
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
CryMeARiver
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3460
Joined: January 6, 2010

Post Post #54 (ISO) » Mon May 17, 2010 11:47 am

Post by CryMeARiver »

EBWOP:
Unvote; Vote: SlySly
Show
You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.


"postgame i'm going to pee on you gandalf

pee on you" - Chesskid

V/LA (No access) from July 8th - July 14th


CMAR :cop:
User avatar
SlySly
SlySly
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
SlySly
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5851
Joined: October 18, 2007
Location: Unknown

Post Post #55 (ISO) » Mon May 17, 2010 11:48 am

Post by SlySly »

I didn't see much different in the choices. Unless my understanding is way off, the cop can't be protected by the doc in either of the choices. Did I miss something in my analysis?
"SlySly is the scummiest player on the site." ~DrippingGoofball
User avatar
MrSandman
MrSandman
Townie
User avatar
User avatar
MrSandman
Townie
Townie
Posts: 56
Joined: May 10, 2010

Post Post #56 (ISO) » Mon May 17, 2010 11:50 am

Post by MrSandman »

Super Smash Bros. Fan wrote:Now I'd like to ask you people a question. Are you getting any sort of scummy reads on anyone?
CryMeARiver for posting what he voted for without discussing as a group if we should disclose or not.
CryMeARiver wrote:Question to everyone: Should we post which we voted for or not and why?
I could see it being useful later on as it could let the cop know if he's protectible. I'll go with whatever is decided upon as a group.
User avatar
CryMeARiver
CryMeARiver
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
CryMeARiver
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3460
Joined: January 6, 2010

Post Post #57 (ISO) » Mon May 17, 2010 11:51 am

Post by CryMeARiver »

SlySly wrote:I didn't see much different in the choices. Unless my understanding is way off, the cop can't be protected by the doc in either of the choices. Did I miss something in my analysis?
SCREWY MCSCREW SCREW
I just reread, and you are right. For some reason I thought it was
1. Macho Cop (can't be protected by cops) and doc
2. Normal cop and normal doc

GRRRRRRRR FACE

I still think my first reason for voting you is the scummiest so far, so...
Show
You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.


"postgame i'm going to pee on you gandalf

pee on you" - Chesskid

V/LA (No access) from July 8th - July 14th


CMAR :cop:
User avatar
mb53
mb53
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
mb53
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1467
Joined: February 14, 2010

Post Post #58 (ISO) » Mon May 17, 2010 11:52 am

Post by mb53 »

Super Smash Bros. Fan wrote:A few of you are overreacting a bit too much, especially CryMeARiver, Timeater, and Andrius. Less fully caps word, more content posts.
CryMeARiver wrote:Question to everyone: Should we post which we voted for or not and why?
I disagree with this. I rather keep this a surprise so we don't ruin it. But seriously, discussing gameplay mechanics isn't really going to get us much results. I saw the argument and it hasn't really been too productive.
CryMeARiver wrote:Do you have any town reads yet?
Not yet. Will change as the game goes on.
CryMeARiver wrote:Do you enjoy short walks on the beach?
Why are you dubious and does that make me expect you to be scummy?
Why do you eat Tim and then deny him the respect of admitting it?
CryMeARiver, three out of the four questions you asked here contribute nothing to the game. Hell, the last two made absolutely no sense and the last question sounds like an attempt to hide RVS in a question, which does not fool me.

Now I'd like to ask you people a question. Are you getting any sort of scummy reads on anyone?

I have a slightly scummy read on CryMeARiver already.

With that said,
Vote: CryMeARiver


And it's not because of those mostly unproductive questions. It's because you're the main force of this discussion that will not benefit us in the long run. RVS fine, even good when ulitized well, but this discussion is going to get nowhere pretty quick.
And you say that
they
are over reacting?
CMAR wrote:A town player would want a cop that is able to be protected by a doctor no matter what. No one knows what a "Macho Cop" entices except that it can't be protected by a doc. I don't see why ANY town would vote 1 unless they just weren't thinking.
Too bad the cop in second choice currently can't be protected either. I assumed that another cop might come into play (like a role cop or something), so I picked 1 so that if that does happen, they can end up being protected.

No scummy or town reads yet.
i literally need to start a driving blog, please remind me
User avatar
CryMeARiver
CryMeARiver
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
CryMeARiver
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3460
Joined: January 6, 2010

Post Post #59 (ISO) » Mon May 17, 2010 11:54 am

Post by CryMeARiver »

MrSandman wrote:
Super Smash Bros. Fan wrote:Now I'd like to ask you people a question. Are you getting any sort of scummy reads on anyone?
CryMeARiver for posting what he voted for without discussing as a group if we should disclose or not.
CryMeARiver wrote:Question to everyone: Should we post which we voted for or not and why?
I could see it being useful later on as it could let the cop know if he's protectible. I'll go with whatever is decided upon as a group.
My bad, completely missed that the cop of the second choice could be protected.
Show
You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.


"postgame i'm going to pee on you gandalf

pee on you" - Chesskid

V/LA (No access) from July 8th - July 14th


CMAR :cop:
User avatar
SlySly
SlySly
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
SlySly
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5851
Joined: October 18, 2007
Location: Unknown

Post Post #60 (ISO) » Mon May 17, 2010 11:54 am

Post by SlySly »

CryMeARiver wrote:
SlySly wrote:
animorpherv1 wrote:
That was a vote to see what role enters the game. Game continues as normally in the day.
mod: Does that mean we needed to send in 2 names?
Pretty sure you were supposed to send in 1 or 2.
Do you see the part about names? I asked the mod if we were supposed to send in 2 names. You said we were supposed to send in 1 or 2. I assumed you meant names. I said I sent in 1, I meant 1 name. I haven't made it clear what my role choice was that I sent in.
"SlySly is the scummiest player on the site." ~DrippingGoofball
User avatar
CryMeARiver
CryMeARiver
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
CryMeARiver
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3460
Joined: January 6, 2010

Post Post #61 (ISO) » Mon May 17, 2010 11:56 am

Post by CryMeARiver »

SlySly wrote:
CryMeARiver wrote:
SlySly wrote:
animorpherv1 wrote:
That was a vote to see what role enters the game. Game continues as normally in the day.
mod: Does that mean we needed to send in 2 names?
Pretty sure you were supposed to send in 1 or 2.
Do you see the part about names? I asked the mod if we were supposed to send in 2 names. You said we were supposed to send in 1 or 2. I assumed you meant names. I said I sent in 1, I meant 1 name. I haven't made it clear what my role choice was that I sent in.
Wow, this is just getting more ridiculous on my part.
We were supposed to send in names?
Show
You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.


"postgame i'm going to pee on you gandalf

pee on you" - Chesskid

V/LA (No access) from July 8th - July 14th


CMAR :cop:
User avatar
mb53
mb53
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
mb53
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1467
Joined: February 14, 2010

Post Post #62 (ISO) » Mon May 17, 2010 11:57 am

Post by mb53 »

CMAR wrote:We were supposed to send in names?
I don't think so...
i literally need to start a driving blog, please remind me
User avatar
MrSandman
MrSandman
Townie
User avatar
User avatar
MrSandman
Townie
Townie
Posts: 56
Joined: May 10, 2010

Post Post #63 (ISO) » Mon May 17, 2010 11:58 am

Post by MrSandman »

Pretty sure we were supposed to just send 1 or 2.
Mafia: 1-0
User avatar
CryMeARiver
CryMeARiver
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
CryMeARiver
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3460
Joined: January 6, 2010

Post Post #64 (ISO) » Mon May 17, 2010 11:58 am

Post by CryMeARiver »

Okay.
I read SlySly's words wrong (though THAT wasn't my fault).
I read Ani's role choices wrong.
Sly is officially just my RL now. Continue.

@Mod: Were we supposed to send in a name with that role choice?
Show
You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.


"postgame i'm going to pee on you gandalf

pee on you" - Chesskid

V/LA (No access) from July 8th - July 14th


CMAR :cop:
User avatar
Super Smash Bros. Fan
Super Smash Bros. Fan
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Super Smash Bros. Fan
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1746
Joined: March 25, 2010

Post Post #65 (ISO) » Mon May 17, 2010 12:03 pm

Post by Super Smash Bros. Fan »

mb53 wrote:And you say that
they
are over reacting?
Luckily, they seem to stop now. However, look back at the earlier posts and you'll see that Timeater, Andrius, and CryMeARiver were overreacting a little, especially since most of there earlier posts consisted of multiple full caps words that wasn't really necessary.
User avatar
Chronopie
Chronopie
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Chronopie
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3443
Joined: February 8, 2010
Location: Auckland, NZ

Post Post #66 (ISO) » Mon May 17, 2010 12:14 pm

Post by Chronopie »

The way I read the Role Choices:

#1: Cop that cannot be Doc protected, Normal Doc
#2: Normal Cop, Doc that cannot protect Cops.

Either way, atm, the cop cannot claim w/out Dying. If we later have another doc choice, the new doc may be able to protect cops, so a normal cop is more beneficial to us.

#1 prevents the cop from ever being safe, so cannot claim, ever, without feeling the NK that night. (unless we get other protective roles i.e. bodyguard).

#2 is a cop that isn't safe, until we get another protective role, but only until then.
Show
He's
baaa-aaack


~Chrono


League of Legends
Chronopie (30) || Greyscale Aeon (12)

Skype: Chronopie

Steam: Chronopie


Apathy = Vanilla [/self-meta]


Because turrets are just there to give poppy a free stun ~Rayfrost
User avatar
Andrius
Andrius
The Baker
User avatar
User avatar
Andrius
The Baker
The Baker
Posts: 12806
Joined: February 16, 2010

Post Post #67 (ISO) » Mon May 17, 2010 12:52 pm

Post by Andrius »

mb53 wrote: And you say that they are over reacting?
We are on page 2, so we're not expecting a lynch relatively soon. lol We are still in the hangover of RVS.
SSBF wrote: Luckily, they seem to stop now. However, look back at the earlier posts and you'll see that Timeater, Andrius, and CryMeARiver were overreacting a little, especially since most of there earlier posts consisted of multiple full caps words that wasn't really necessary.
So sue me for trying to make the game more enjoyable.

And yeah, PR choice #1 lets the Doc protect other potential Cops, while choice #2 gives us a Doc that cannot protect any cops.
"This is the true face of a man who plays paladin."
User avatar
animorpherv1
animorpherv1
Honey Trap
User avatar
User avatar
animorpherv1
Honey Trap
Honey Trap
Posts: 5763
Joined: April 12, 2008
Location: Untraveled Road

Post Post #68 (ISO) » Mon May 17, 2010 1:00 pm

Post by animorpherv1 »

Vote Count 1!


Andrius (3): CMAR, SlySly, InHim
CMAR (2): Timeater, SSBF
Timeater (1): Andrius
SSBF (1): MrSandman

Not voting (5): Chronopie, kyle99, mb53 Nacho, manho

With 12 alive, it takes 7 to lynch!

Deadline is on May 31st at 4:44 PM EST!

CMAR, you can have fun, but please rein it in. Telling people to go die isn't acceptible. Do it on your own time.
:wink:
"Animorpherv1's posts are so powerful that prolonged exposure may cause vertigo, nausea, acute tinnitus, and in rare cases, death." - vonflare

"Ani is right 100% of the time" - Alisae
User avatar
CryMeARiver
CryMeARiver
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
CryMeARiver
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3460
Joined: January 6, 2010

Post Post #69 (ISO) » Mon May 17, 2010 1:48 pm

Post by CryMeARiver »

Chronopie wrote:The way I read the Role Choices:

#1: Cop that cannot be Doc protected, Normal Doc
#2: Normal Cop, Doc that cannot protect Cops.

Either way, atm, the cop cannot claim w/out Dying. If we later have another doc choice, the new doc may be able to protect cops, so a normal cop is more beneficial to us.

#1 prevents the cop from ever being safe, so cannot claim, ever, without feeling the NK that night. (unless we get other protective roles i.e. bodyguard).

#2 is a cop that isn't safe, until we get another protective role, but only until then.
Ahhh, my friend you are being one sided.
Reading it, the choices were based on this:
#1 is good if we end up with the choice of another cop that can be doc protected
#2 is good if we end up with the choice of another doc that can protect cops

@Andrius: We are on Page 3 ;)

@Mod: You clearly want me to be voting Andrius for some reason based on your last vote count, so back to the RV that I want and that's modconfirmed ;)
Unvote; Vote: Andrius
Show
You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.


"postgame i'm going to pee on you gandalf

pee on you" - Chesskid

V/LA (No access) from July 8th - July 14th


CMAR :cop:
User avatar
SlySly
SlySly
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
SlySly
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5851
Joined: October 18, 2007
Location: Unknown

Post Post #70 (ISO) » Mon May 17, 2010 2:12 pm

Post by SlySly »

CryMeARiver wrote: We were supposed to send in names?
Paraphrasing the instructions I received in my role PM:

"Send mod confirmation PM along with role choice. Then thread will open and votes can be placed."

I read it as, still paraphrasing:

"Send mod confirmation PM, with role choice and your vote."

Reading it again, I don't think we were supposed to send in any names.
"SlySly is the scummiest player on the site." ~DrippingGoofball
User avatar
Super Smash Bros. Fan
Super Smash Bros. Fan
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Super Smash Bros. Fan
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1746
Joined: March 25, 2010

Post Post #71 (ISO) » Mon May 17, 2010 2:14 pm

Post by Super Smash Bros. Fan »

Does anyone finds it weird that CryMeARiver dropped his case against SlySly when SlySly rebutted him? He even changed his vote to Andrius, who hasn't really been that scummy (Just a bit overreactive, but yeah, we need to move one from that argument, unless mb53 asks for evidence of how Andrius, CryMeARiver, and Timeater were being a little bit overreactive).

CryMeARiver, give your own reasons why Andrius has your vote. I calling BS on this quote below:
CryMeARiver wrote:@Mod: You clearly want me to be voting Andrius for some reason based on your last vote count, so back to the RV that I want and that's modconfirmed
Unvote; Vote: Andrius
User avatar
CryMeARiver
CryMeARiver
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
CryMeARiver
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3460
Joined: January 6, 2010

Post Post #72 (ISO) » Mon May 17, 2010 2:18 pm

Post by CryMeARiver »

Super Smash Bros. Fan wrote:Does anyone finds it weird that CryMeARiver dropped his case against SlySly when SlySly rebutted him? He even changed his vote to Andrius, who hasn't really been that scummy (Just a bit overreactive, but yeah, we need to move one from that argument, unless mb53 asks for evidence of how Andrius, CryMeARiver, and Timeater were being a little bit overreactive).

CryMeARiver, give your own reasons why Andrius has your vote. I calling BS on this quote below:
CryMeARiver wrote:@Mod: You clearly want me to be voting Andrius for some reason based on your last vote count, so back to the RV that I want and that's modconfirmed
Unvote; Vote: Andrius
I dropped it because I completely misinterpreted EVERYTHING from what the mod said to what Sly said. So I went back to my RV that I was comfortable with and a bandwagon to start of a game never hurt anyone and always gets info from the town.
Show
You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.


"postgame i'm going to pee on you gandalf

pee on you" - Chesskid

V/LA (No access) from July 8th - July 14th


CMAR :cop:
User avatar
Chronopie
Chronopie
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Chronopie
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3443
Joined: February 8, 2010
Location: Auckland, NZ

Post Post #73 (ISO) » Mon May 17, 2010 3:46 pm

Post by Chronopie »

@CMAR: I might have been a little one sided in my analysis, but I value the info a cop can give us, over an inhibited doc. So I voted for a normal cop over a normal doc. Although atm the cop is unprotectable either way the vote went.

besides, if/when we have another doc PR option, I'd rather a protectable cop.
Show
He's
baaa-aaack


~Chrono


League of Legends
Chronopie (30) || Greyscale Aeon (12)

Skype: Chronopie

Steam: Chronopie


Apathy = Vanilla [/self-meta]


Because turrets are just there to give poppy a free stun ~Rayfrost
User avatar
Andrius
Andrius
The Baker
User avatar
User avatar
Andrius
The Baker
The Baker
Posts: 12806
Joined: February 16, 2010

Post Post #74 (ISO) » Mon May 17, 2010 6:52 pm

Post by Andrius »

CMAR wrote: LOL, I just realized you were SSBF and not Flava Flave.
lol. SSBF doesn't rap though, and he doesn't CC me. :evil:
Animorpherv1 wrote: Telling people to go die isn't acceptible.
Mods with basic spelling errors are inacceptable. /JOKING :P
CMAR wrote: @Mod: You clearly want me to be voting Andrius for some reason based on your last vote count, so back to the RV that I want and that's modconfirmed ;)
Unvote; Vote: Andrius
What just happened here? You were already voting me, if I'm not mistaken. lol

@ Mod: How often do we get to vote for PRs? Every NP?
"This is the true face of a man who plays paladin."

Return to “Completed Mini Theme Games”