Pledge of Allegiance (Game Over! Page 76)

[Chronopie]

@UK: I don't see why Jack's choice in wording is that suspicious. Given the flavour and xvart's flip, it's a fair enough working assumption.

--

@Farside: Tunnelling in on a single claimed

Non-Hostile

Other isn't the most productive way to win i.e rid the town of enemy killing roles i.e mafia, SK.

Unless your wincon is to get more points than other factions, and eliminating members of other factions is a way to do so...

(non-hostile other)

[UncertainKitten]

@Chronopie: We know that there is a Legislature, Judiciary, and Executive faction. Why did he pick Legislature instead of one of the others?

Hence my "hmmm"

Add this to his non hostile cult claim.

Again, HMMM~!

[StrangerCoug]

Life is tiring and the site is slow, so these are just quickies:

farside22, since she's not a lynch option, needs a bullet put in her head.
Zorblag, that your posts don't look like scumhunting.

[Jack]

Why the legislature? Very interesting choice.

xvart was in the legislature. Later I checked back to see if farside was linked in an incrimating way, but nothing better than weakly possible distancing.

[DrippingGoofball]

I GUARANTEE that farside WOULD distance - possibly with reasoning that makes little sense. Can you verify that?

[farside22]

Why the legislature? Very interesting choice.

xvart was in the legislature. Later I checked back to see if farside was linked in an incrimating way, but nothing better than weakly possible distancing.

Lets not forget xvart attacking me during the time I stated I had issues.
Right lets see he's bussing while I'm distancing? Sure it makes as much sense as people believe fishy right about now.
Lets vote farside for being obvious town who claimed her target and is harping on him as a liar because that is so scummy to do.
DGB still has neglected to answer my question.
Good times.

[Jack]

She stuck on Phate while saying a bunch of stuff about xvart.

Llama post 162 leans me believing he is town and I like his case on xvart.
*note to self look at xvart in iso*
Xvart: Why is it scummy for someone to bring up a QT comment?

...

vote:phate

I had a few issues with xvart. The biggest issue is him focusing on the QT and trying to make it look scummy. Your case is good and it has xvart talking. I'm going with my gut read of phate based on how little he has said this game (meta) right now.

Why do you think that xvart isn't scummy?

Switches to pops later on.
*****
Saying xvart is suspicious but voting phate and then pops, never really doing anything with the xvart wagon, greatly increased activity to push fishy's lynch.


And lets not forget, fishy has claimed his faction has a track ability.

[farside22]

Jack: You think I'm bussing someone in my own faction? Are you high?
If you believe fishy which your vote does seem to indicate. And fishy is claiming his faction is non-hostile other why would I be bussing him?
How much sense does that even make in your tiny little brain?

[farside22]

Oh lets do more shit and giggles at this point
Oh fishy do you know the people that are in your group? If so will you answer honestly if people asked you if player X was part of your group? If not why? If so why?

[Jack]

It's pretty obvious at this point that fishy is your alt.

[Jack]

Evidence in a minute, big post.

[DrippingGoofball]

I GUARANTEE that farside WOULD distance - possibly with reasoning that makes little sense. Can you verify that?

[Jack]

The "using the QT as evidence" didn't make any sense to me. I can't verify whether it makes any sense to you though.

[DrippingGoofball]

Right lets see he's bussing while I'm distancing?

Gadzooks! Bus'ing is distancing with a vote. The phenomena is often reciprocal.

[DrippingGoofball]

Jack: You think I'm bussing someone in my own faction? Are you high?

What other kind of bus'ing is there? (referring to xvart)

And fishy is claiming his faction is non-hostile other why would I be bussing him?

I think you are an opposing faction to Fishy. Otherwise you wouldn't have investigated him.

[Ellibereth]

Wait. Did Fishy say there were NINE of the point peoples or am I remembering wrong.

[Jack]

He said 3 factions with 2 or more members. I think he may have said six or "at least six" later on.

[Chronopie]

He said that the nh-other factions were at least 2 people. So 6+ nh-o's

[d3x]

Ok, I just caught up in my other 2 games. I'll be working on this one later tonight as it'll take a

lot

more time.

[zoraster]

animorpherv1 replaces Phate

[farside22]

Jack: You think I'm bussing someone in my own faction? Are you high?

What other kind of bus'ing is there? (referring to xvart)

And fishy is claiming his faction is non-hostile other why would I be bussing him?

I think you are an opposing faction to Fishy. Otherwise you wouldn't have investigated him.

Yeah it has nothing to do with what I said on day one when I said I had a read that didn't seem town.

[Chronopie]

Evidence in a minute, big post.

Uhhh... where's this big post?

[Chronopie]

Also Hai Ani.

Opinion's on Fishy's claim, Zorblag's probably alignment, Farside's probably alignment, Jack's lack of refutation of being cult, and opinion of groupings in general.

[Chronopie]

And fishy is claiming his faction is non-hostile other why would I be bussing him?

I think you are an opposing faction to Fishy. Otherwise you wouldn't have investigated him.

Wait, what? Farside

knew

Fishy's alignment D1? Where's the evidence?

[Jack]

I still don't get why farside thinks I'm accusing her of bussing. My theory was about her distancing with xvart, and attacking fishy because he's an opposing scum faction (of three legislature, executive etc). That is in no way her bussing fishy.

My guess is that she got confused because I worded it like "let's say farside is a member of the legislature and fishy is the judiciary" and farside actually is one of those and had that in mind when I was accusing her of bussing.