Mini 945: Mafia in Bawlmer - GAME OVER

Ythan · Post Post #600 (ISO) » Mon May 17, 2010 2:43 pm

Maybe it's the lurking.

MacavityLock · Post Post #601 (ISO) » Mon May 17, 2010 2:58 pm

Cyberbob, any comment on my case on xvart?

Also, Neto hasn't posted in 5 days, and needs a prod.

Prodded

Dizzle · Post Post #602 (ISO) » Mon May 17, 2010 3:16 pm

Ythan wrote:Dizzle or xvart...I'll take a look.

Well? Did you take a look at xvart?

Ythan wrote:Yeah I don't like Diz's lynch or be lynched vote. At all actually.

This just reads like you're locked into me no matter what. Not necessarily scummy but certainly not pro-town.

MacavityLock wrote:Also, Neto hasn't posted in 5 days, and needs a prod.

So Neto does very little the entire game, comes back and participates just enough to direct suspicion elsewhere, and then disappears again. Yeah, I'd be totally fine switching my vote back to him.

Ythan · Post Post #603 (ISO) » Mon May 17, 2010 3:24 pm

Dizzle wrote:This just reads like you're locked into me no matter what. Not necessarily scummy but certainly not pro-town.

This reads like you have some reading problems. The fact that you addressed a post made after it but not the one immediately following it is just, ugh.

Dizzle · Post Post #604 (ISO) » Mon May 17, 2010 3:29 pm

I saw the other post, but I was talking about your immediate reaction.

xvart · Post Post #605 (ISO) » Mon May 17, 2010 3:30 pm

Don't worry; Neto will be one of the people in the hot seat tomorrow once you flip scum.

xvart.

Netopalis · Post Post #606 (ISO) » Mon May 17, 2010 3:33 pm

If anything of substance had been said since my last post, I'd comment. However, I'm still convinced of ML and Dizzle's guilt. All we're seeing is Dizzle going, "Hey! Look over there!" and ML trying to support Dizzle's attempts to cast blame on others without being drawn into the morass himself. The attacks on Xvart are, in my opinion, extremely weak. The story which is being concocted to support that scenario simply doesn't match the facts of the game as I see it. However, I am switching my vote to Dizzle because his reactions have shifted him to the more likely of the two to be scum in my opinion.

Unvote, vote: Dizzle

Ythan · Post Post #607 (ISO) » Mon May 17, 2010 3:34 pm

Dizzle wrote:I saw the other post, but I was talking about your immediate reaction.

Oh. Well in that case don't care how you claim it reads to you because your accusation doesn't make sense.

Ythan · Post Post #608 (ISO) » Mon May 17, 2010 3:37 pm

Hey Neto you just hammered.

Netopalis · Post Post #609 (ISO) » Mon May 17, 2010 4:35 pm

Meh, accidental, but I'm confident in it.

Amished · Post Post #610 (ISO) » Mon May 17, 2010 5:10 pm

Votecount FINAL

Dizzle (4): xvart, Cyberbob, Ythan, Netopalis

Dizzle has been lynched!

He was just a

vanilla townie

Submit night actions within 72 hours of this post.

Amished · Post Post #611 (ISO) » Thu May 20, 2010 11:10 am

xvart, Vanilla Townie

has been killed.

Not voting (5): StrangerCoug, Ythan, Netopalis, MacavityLock, Cyberbob

With 5 alive, it takes 3 to lynch.

Deadline is on June 3rd, two weeks from now.

Ythan · Post Post #612 (ISO) » Thu May 20, 2010 12:04 pm

Competing wagon killed. If it was by a vig I think he should claim because in that case chances are I blocked scum last night. But don't claim just yet, I want to get a little feedback on this tactic.

Netopalis · Post Post #613 (ISO) » Thu May 20, 2010 3:40 pm

Hmm. Since we've seen only one kill per night, I seriously doubt that we have a vig. Sure, it can happen...but that sort of thing is rare, especially in minigames. I think it's fairly uncontroverted that two of us are scum - that means that we have a 2/3rds chance of hitting correctly. Personally, I'm stymied. I was

convinced

that Dizzle was scum. Really disturbing. My initial reaction is to go after ML and Strangercoug, simply because I can't find that much to say about Ythan or Cyberbob's play.

Cyberbob · Post Post #614 (ISO) » Thu May 20, 2010 5:04 pm

It was by a vig, and that vig was me. I also killed dramonic back on Night 2.

Cyberbob · Post Post #615 (ISO) » Thu May 20, 2010 5:05 pm

(I'm not actually a vanilla vig, I can only kill people on even-numbered nights)

Ythan · Post Post #616 (ISO) » Thu May 20, 2010 6:03 pm

Not unbelievable, I have been an even-night vig before. Looking at how it all fits together.

MacavityLock · Post Post #617 (ISO) » Thu May 20, 2010 6:05 pm

Really inopportune time to have been stranded an hour away from where I live due to flat tires. On borrowed time on a friend's comp, so don't expect much from me for a little bit.

That said, there are some rather ridiculous things about Cyberbob's vig claim. First off, we've only ever seen one kill a night, at most. Second of all, we're assuming two scum left, right? So, if a vig mis-killed last night and scum killed, that ends the game in a scum win. A townie vig

should not have killed

last night.

I need to ponder this for a bit, and I should be back safe at home in a day or so (hopefully). Don't go a-lynching while I'm away, please.

Ythan · Post Post #618 (ISO) » Thu May 20, 2010 6:10 pm

Are you also attacking him because you're the one I jailed last night, ML?

Netopalis · Post Post #619 (ISO) » Fri May 21, 2010 12:19 am

It's unlikely that the mafia would have had ML perform the kill, though, since they knew you were a jailkeep from your previous claim and since ML was under heavy suspicion.

Ythan · Post Post #620 (ISO) » Fri May 21, 2010 2:56 am

I think that's a big glass of wine.

Netopalis · Post Post #621 (ISO) » Fri May 21, 2010 3:43 am

Well, if it's true, it implicates Cyberbob....I don't think it's a terrible stretch, though.

Ythan · Post Post #622 (ISO) » Fri May 21, 2010 4:04 am

Implicates bob?

Netopalis · Post Post #623 (ISO) » Fri May 21, 2010 4:31 am

Sure. Bob could be claiming vig falsely, when the kill was actually the mafia's factional kill which he used.

Ythan · Post Post #624 (ISO) » Fri May 21, 2010 5:05 am

This has to be lylo. Claiming time?