Making a wagon on just for my pregame posts is not helpful maybe only for the scum.
As for the questions
1)played some games on another site. Another one here. And a lot in real life.
2)Yes I consider myself epxerienced
Oh, anything useful and anything to suggest that you're not just watching and reporting to the QuickTopic.vezopiraka 200 wrote:@vi: Why are you accusing me of lurking? What would you expect me to post?
Making a wagon on just for my pregame posts is not helpful maybe only for the scum.
Oh so there's no excuse for your play then.vezo 200 wrote:As for the questions
1)played some games on another site. Another one here. And a lot in real life.
2)Yes I consider myself epxerienced
I got impatient, and I don't want the Parama/SSBF wagons to go so far that they can't be stopped given the Town reads I have on them.Sevis 201 wrote:Vi had intended to reserve comment, and then made several posts.
It's called a reaction test, and you failed. Yes, I lied. It should have been obvious because it was heavily implied I meant you. When you eased up after this I knew I had caught scum. You didn't even ask who I said I was mentioning.Super Smash Bros. Fan wrote:I started to become suspcious of Parama waaaay before the game started. He started out as a /caught scum already post. Thinking it was applying to me, he responded to me. He said he wasn't talking about me. Less then fifteen minutes later, he contradicted himself by saying he was implying it to me.
So you're denying that anything in pre-game is worth mentioning.Super Smash Bros. Fan wrote:Today at 5:53 AM, before the game even got started, he begun to campaign for my lynch. This is way premature. I can understand doing it when we have a lot to go off and your reason for voting a person is legitimate, but that was pre-game, so this makes absolutely no sense.
LOL. I didn't imply any definite times, and you act like I did.Super Smash Bros. Fan wrote:I noticed another contradiction here. He said he didn't want me lynched too quickly. Then why did he on the EXACT same post say that he'll be pretty mad if it takes too long to lynch? This is another contradiction.Parama wrote:We're lynching you Day 1 but I never said it had to happen quickly. Though if it takes too long I'll be pretty mad.
Scum are the ones concerned about looking scummy. They act cautious. Townies have reason to act aggressive - it pressures the scum into slipping up. There's no reason to be cautious as town.Super Smash Bros. Fan wrote:He also said that he didn't like the fact I was trying to be cautious. I don't see how that's a problem. Being cautious can actually be helpful in the game. It means you're trying to think before posting and if anything, it benefits you.
You didn't give any reason to suspect me - implying you had no reason to want to vote besides me voting you.Super Smash Bros. Fan wrote:He started off Day 1 with a half-assed case on me. When Vi explained what was the purpose of my vote, I said it was random, but if my vote was serious, it would voting toward Parama. He then goes to immediately accuse me of doing an OMGUS if I were to do that, which I call BS on.
I am lazy and hate repeating myself.Super Smash Bros. Fan wrote:When Seraphim and Leafsnail asked Parama to explain why I was suspicious again, Parama gave half-hearted responses multiple times. From ISO 17-21, Parama completely neglected to mention why I was scummy when they both asked.
I'm tunneling to draw out scum - it works in two different way.Super Smash Bros. Fan wrote:On top of that, out of all the people on my bandwagon (him, Unsight, Chronopie, Dr. Robotnik), no one and I mean no one has tunneled me as much as Parama. Almost all of his posts has been dedicated toward me. Most of his pre-game post were related to me in some way and I swear,every single postin Day 1 are in some way related toward going against me. It makes me wonder if he's even considering other suspects.
Vi wrote:No, not really. SSBF isn't the only focal point of this game.Unsight 175 wrote:That would depend on SSBF's alignment wouldn't you say?Vi wrote:"Last several games"? I thought I was supposed to be the one stalking youUnsight 168 wrote:Huh. Well, it's an observation. You didn't use colors like that in your last several games or at all in fact. Blue and purple text certainly did catch my attention though so I was wondering if that was the purpose.
Come on, I really don't want to have a repeat of the last game. (Unless you're scum.) What have you noticed going on ITT that scum are more likely to do?
That's odd. I'm very close to a game that'sUnsight 179 wrote:I didn't recall seeing colors in any of Vi's recent threads so it was worth asking why.heavily flavored aroundcolor. You can even see its effects on my wiki page. Lay off the sauce
---
Please get out of it.M-Sorrow 181 wrote:So. I still am in the RVFSRS. Randomly voting for stupid reasons stage.
---
Read the thread plz.daniel94581 wrote:vezopiraka (4): askbob, Vi, The Goat, nhammen
Do you think he's scum?
If you do Why?
I'll go ahead and ask the obvious question
---
SSBF and Parama wagons are still the choices of n00bs and scum.
Vi wrote:No, not really. SSBF isn't the only focal point of this game.Unsight 175 wrote:That would depend on SSBF's alignment wouldn't you say?Vi wrote:"Last several games"? I thought I was supposed to be the one stalking youUnsight 168 wrote:Huh. Well, it's an observation. You didn't use colors like that in your last several games or at all in fact. Blue and purple text certainly did catch my attention though so I was wondering if that was the purpose.
Come on, I really don't want to have a repeat of the last game. (Unless you're scum.) What have you noticed going on ITT that scum are more likely to do?
That's odd. I'm very close to a game that'sUnsight 179 wrote:I didn't recall seeing colors in any of Vi's recent threads so it was worth asking why.heavily flavored aroundcolor. You can even see its effects on my wiki page. Lay off the sauce
---
Please get out of it.M-Sorrow 181 wrote:So. I still am in the RVFSRS. Randomly voting for stupid reasons stage.
---
Read the thread plz.daniel94581 wrote:vezopiraka (4): askbob, Vi, The Goat, nhammen
Do you think he's scum?
If you do Why?
I'll go ahead and ask the obvious question
---
SSBF and Parama wagons are still the choices of n00bs and scum.
or is he now? Oh I dont have a single clue.daniel94581 wrote:Vi wrote:No, not really. SSBF isn't the only focal point of this game.Unsight 175 wrote:That would depend on SSBF's alignment wouldn't you say?Vi wrote:"Last several games"? I thought I was supposed to be the one stalking youUnsight 168 wrote:Huh. Well, it's an observation. You didn't use colors like that in your last several games or at all in fact. Blue and purple text certainly did catch my attention though so I was wondering if that was the purpose.
Come on, I really don't want to have a repeat of the last game. (Unless you're scum.) What have you noticed going on ITT that scum are more likely to do?
That's odd. I'm very close to a game that'sUnsight 179 wrote:I didn't recall seeing colors in any of Vi's recent threads so it was worth asking why.heavily flavored aroundcolor. You can even see its effects on my wiki page. Lay off the sauce
---
Please get out of it.M-Sorrow 181 wrote:So. I still am in the RVFSRS. Randomly voting for stupid reasons stage.
---
Read the thread plz.daniel94581 wrote:vezopiraka (4): askbob, Vi, The Goat, nhammen
Do you think he's scum?
If you do Why?
I'll go ahead and ask the obvious question
---
SSBF and Parama wagons are still the choices of n00bs and scum.he's town confirmed for me.
or is he now? Oh I dont have a single clue.daniel94581 wrote:Vi wrote:No, not really. SSBF isn't the only focal point of this game.Unsight 175 wrote:That would depend on SSBF's alignment wouldn't you say?Vi wrote:"Last several games"? I thought I was supposed to be the one stalking youUnsight 168 wrote:Huh. Well, it's an observation. You didn't use colors like that in your last several games or at all in fact. Blue and purple text certainly did catch my attention though so I was wondering if that was the purpose.
Come on, I really don't want to have a repeat of the last game. (Unless you're scum.) What have you noticed going on ITT that scum are more likely to do?
That's odd. I'm very close to a game that'sUnsight 179 wrote:I didn't recall seeing colors in any of Vi's recent threads so it was worth asking why.heavily flavored aroundcolor. You can even see its effects on my wiki page. Lay off the sauce
---
Please get out of it.M-Sorrow 181 wrote:So. I still am in the RVFSRS. Randomly voting for stupid reasons stage.
---
Read the thread plz.daniel94581 wrote:vezopiraka (4): askbob, Vi, The Goat, nhammen
Do you think he's scum?
If you do Why?
I'll go ahead and ask the obvious question
---
SSBF and Parama wagons are still the choices of n00bs and scum.he's town confirmed for me.
Are you smoking crack vez? What inside source is this? What a fascinating development.vezopiraka wrote:I have somewhat of an inside source and I can tell you that lynchmepls is in the mafia but he's not werewolf. And no I don't know this cause I'm scum.
unvote:vi
Vote:Lynchmepls
I was only curious about SSBF being very tense, I don't actually think he's scummy, but I definitely have an eye on himVi wrote:The more Parama talks, the more I want to rescind my initial Town read on him and/or smack him through the Internet.
SSBF is most likely naive VI-Town. Emphasis on all of naive, VI, and Town.
I don't know if Chronopie istryingto look scummy, or if this is just normal, but stuff like 131 makes me twitch.
My favorite scumhunting tool told me "Prediction hazy, ask again".
But let's take a look elsewhere at what I was seeing earlier.
askbob, vezopiraka, SGRaaize, and LynchMePlz all softly egged on the SSBF wagon without actually taking the active role Parama did and/or tried to use their own "unique" brand of arguments against SSBF (askbob 65, vezo 77, LMP's MASSIVE fence-sit in 88). The chance of all of them being Town is nil.
My vote's going to the one who IMO had the most weak comments of them allon top oflurking in New York while not posting earlier. (I've already looked at the other games in this subforum; he's not in any of them.)
(L-11)Vote: vezopiraka
Any new developments on him or anyone else?SGRaaize 214 wrote:I was only curious about SSBF being very tense, I don't actually think he's scummy, but I definitely have an eye on himVi wrote:The more Parama talks, the more I want to rescind my initial Town read on him and/or smack him through the Internet.
SSBF is most likely naive VI-Town. Emphasis on all of naive, VI, and Town.
I don't know if Chronopie istryingto look scummy, or if this is just normal, but stuff like 131 makes me twitch.
My favorite scumhunting tool told me "Prediction hazy, ask again".
But let's take a look elsewhere at what I was seeing earlier.
askbob, vezopiraka, SGRaaize, and LynchMePlz all softly egged on the SSBF wagon without actually taking the active role Parama did and/or tried to use their own "unique" brand of arguments against SSBF (askbob 65, vezo 77, LMP's MASSIVE fence-sit in 88). The chance of all of them being Town is nil.
My vote's going to the one who IMO had the most weak comments of them allon top oflurking in New York while not posting earlier. (I've already looked at the other games in this subforum; he's not in any of them.)
(L-11)Vote: vezopiraka
Looks very scummy to me. It's like every sentence is its own scumtell.LynchMePls wrote:I like this fence. I think SSBF is either scummy or over eager town, and I haven't made up my mind yet. I also think egging the whole thing on has been good for town. I'd be surprised if Parama AND SSBF are both town. I wanted to see how it shakes out.
Lowell wrote:vote parama. WINCON.
I love early bandwagons, but not SSBF. Games need one or two overeager go-getters early on.
Lowell wrote:Haha. He wishes. After all, look how hard this guy tries and still is getting lynched. I haven't done nearly as much and am basically unlynchable.pman5595 wrote:SSBF is idiot town, a Lowell like character (OOOOOHHH BURNNNNNEDD). Quick wagon is super scummy.Vote: Dr Robotnik
Which "obvious reasons" are those?SGRaaize 218 wrote:I suspect Paramara for obvious reasons
Then, in what seems to be an overlooked suspicion, I suspect Lowell:
Okay.leaf wrote: Oh, I thought by "example" you meant "For example, this is what I think now".
Nevermind.
Uhhhh...wat?vezopiraka wrote:I have somewhat of an inside source and I can tell you that lynchmepls is in the mafia but he's not werewolf. And no I don't know this cause I'm scum.
unvote:vi
Vote:Lynchmepls
Can you please elaborate on how post 121 was scummy?SerialClergyman wrote:Timeater gets a special mention for scummy 121 as well.
What mindgames? Even if you were "scared", how is that a proper reason to vote? Please elaborate.Midnight's Sorrow wrote:Unvote
vote:Vi
Vi's mind games scare me quite a bit.
In what way does this make them scum?Super Smash Bros. Fan wrote:Vote: SeraphimandFoS: nhammenbecause they didn't post during pre-game period.
So why are you voting randomly, if the pregame should definitely be enough to get some real reads. You have a scum read on Parama, why didn't you vote on it?Super Smash Bros. Fan wrote:Not at all. This was completely random. If I was serious, I would have driven my vote to Parama.Vi wrote:Do you think any of the people who DID post during pregame are scummy?Super Smash Bros. Fan 122 wrote:Vote: SeraphimandFoS: nhammenbecause they didn't post during pre-game period.
Wait, so he's your top lynch candidate, but not quite scummy enough for your vote? Huh?Super Smash Bros. Fan wrote:Explain how this post is a scum tell. I am not seeing it.Super Smash Bros. Fan wrote:Let's just say that I'm just getting a bit excited, that is all. I wasn't meaning to get into a super-serious argument with anyone here pre-game anyway.Parama wrote:Dammit, I screwed up!
Absolutely not. I have reasons for suspecting you. As a matter of fact, you're my top lynch candidate. I do find you slightly suspicious, but not enough to place a vote on.Parama wrote:ALSO.So you'd OMGUS me?Super Smash Bros. Fan wrote:Not at all. This was completely random. If I was serious, I would have driven my vote to Parama.Vi wrote:Do you think any of the people who DID post during pregame are scummy?Super Smash Bros. Fan 122 wrote:Vote: SeraphimandFoS: nhammenbecause they didn't post during pre-game period.
Pomegranates rule. But it's fine, you can be wrong if you want to.Midnight's Sorrow wrote:IF I was half as serious as some of you guys seem to atm, I'd vote a certain someone
But as it stands, I WANTZ MY RV DAMMIT!!
Vote:Pomegranate
....my least favorite fruit
.....
......Did I mention I dislike pmeranates yet??? o.0
I'd go with the garbage instead of speculating about a role that changes his alignment.Chronopie wrote:It sounds like: If you quick hammer me, There's a high chance of me being town.
Lets flip that coin for a sec: If you leave me for later, there's a lower chance of me being Town...
Recruit-able Traitor?
Either that, or he's spouting garbage.
Yeah, I get the Town vs. Town vibes too.SerialClergyman wrote:I'd be surprised if they weren't. What about the scenario of 'overeager, inexperienced town gets pounced on early by townie with a read' is unlikely to you?I'd be surprised if Parama AND SSBF are both town.
Okay, fine. But look at this-daniel94581, Post 192 wrote:askbob wrote:vezopiraka wrote:If your town why would you say this? You're like already dead. You can claim if you wantSuper Smash Bros. Fan wrote:If you quick hammer me, you run a higher risk of killing a townie. Let's run Day 1 ful or at least almost full course before deciding on the list.Parama wrote:We should be lynching SSBF D1 anyways, I don't see why it's important.I think I found scum,urging a roleclaim before even getting close to a lynch.How?He wasn't urging it he was saying he could if he wanted to
Until you give better reason for voting.
vote askbob[/b]
Wiat, and the reason for your vot wasn't weak, daniel?daniel94581, post 193 wrote:Weak reason for voting remove vote now.The Goat wrote:Good God.
SSBF and Parama, if you keep throwing off scumvibes, one of you is going to make for a VERY short D1.
Random.org saysvote Vezopiraka
In that casevezopiraka wrote:I have somewhat of an inside source and I can tell you that lynchmepls is in the mafia but he's not werewolf. And no I don't know this cause I'm scum.
unvote:vi
Vote:Lynchmepls
We don't need a claim right now.daniel94581 wrote:vezopiraka wrote:I have somewhat of an inside source and I can tell you that lynchmepls is in the mafia but he's not werewolf. And no I don't know this cause I'm scum.
unvote:vi
Vote:LynchmeplsSome sort of cop?