Way to tie yourself to farside22.Plum wrote:Because you're useless and you're not Town. Do you disagree on either count?
Yes, I think farside22 is scum. No, this is not the right way to respond to her. She already knows you're something.charter wrote:I'm not telling what I targeted him with, unless we massclaim. I didn't kill him.
I have no problem claiming first in a massclaim, I know no one is going to claim anything similar to me. But me claiming now will tell town nothing and will make my role useless.Gammagooey wrote:The thinking of hmmm, I'm gonna have to claim soon. I should see if I can get everyone else to claim with me.
Yeah. In full, that someone visited Chrono last Night. The Someone is left unspecified.Zorblag wrote:@Plum, would you like to confirm that it was Chronopie that you got your transmission about? I think that you left that vague. Same question to you about alignment reveal as DrippingGoofball just got.
-Zorblag R`Lyeh
Whaaaaaaat?Chronopie wrote:I was told that I would show not to be town aligned on investigation. I don't know if that means mafia in particular, I'd assume so.
Hm? How so and what do you care to imply by saying so?StrangerCoug wrote: Way to tie yourself to farside22.
It makes perfect sense if I think you're either on an opposing Mafia group or a serial killer.charter wrote:StrangerCoug, if you think farside is scum, do you think I'm scum with her? Your vote makes no sense. Honestly, the three people voting me look really opportunistic. Farside has made every opportunistic vote available the entire game.
Both of you look like you're policy lynching non-town indiscriminately, so I think the two of you share an alignment.Plum wrote:Hm? How so and what do you care to imply by saying so?StrangerCoug wrote: Way to tie yourself to farside22.
Town.Plum wrote:Charter, do you mind claiming whether you're Town or Other, though?
Good try there slick, but you're going to have to do better. There are two kills each night. We know where one comes from, so the other is almost assuredly scum. There's no third kill for me to be a SK or another scum group. So back to the question, do you think I'm scum with farside, and how do you think that works?Stranger wrote:It makes perfect sense if I think you're either on an opposing Mafia group or a serial killer.
It appeared that #1379 was advocating Shotty's policy lynch. I'll look through tomorrow.Plum wrote:Um, not policy lynching non-Town indiscriminately. Read my posts, please. I'm in for outing them indiscriminately and am more interested in seeing clearly who's what. Thereisa reason for this. Separating out true Other claims from fake ones helps see where our pool of true scum actually is. That's why, for example, I'm happy we have outed d3x and Shotty as Other, and have Zorblag at the very least to help test such claims.
Again, check my posts and note that while I talk a lot about outing Others as a good thing, I clearly standagainstpolicy lynching them.
charter wrote:Good try there slick, but you're going to have to do better. There are two kills each night. We know where one comes from, so the other is almost assuredly scum. There's no third kill for me to be a SK or another scum group.Stranger wrote:It makes perfect sense if I think you're either on an opposing Mafia group or a serial killer.
I thought this was implied. No, I do not think you are scum with farside22. Additionally, a hostile non-other flip from farside22, while something I don't think will happen, won't surprise me; therefore, I could be in serious error by pushing for her lynch.charter wrote:So back to the question, do you think I'm scum with farside, and how do you think that works?
Could you clarify what you mean here? I'm having trouble parsing it.Additionally, a hostile non-other flip from farside22, while something I don't think will happen, won't surprise me; therefore, I could be in serious error by pushing for her lynch.
No, it was a statement of fact supporting why I would have been pleased to see Shotty dead, and both were factual. I did not want to use a lynch on Shotty; I wanted Zorb to possibly use an Other-killing shot against him, as he was not merely Other but useless. Because Zorb's shot is effective at taking out useless Others and that's basically the extent to which it can be used to our benefit (unless we definitively uncover a points-faction which helps scum, in which case the best use would be taking down counter-productive Other, but I digress), Shotty would have been an excellent target and him gone would have been no unhelpful thing, in my opinion. Zorb using his shot to hunt Non-Hostile Other is as valid a way of using it, I suppose, so it's okay if he does that on our orders.StrangerCoug wrote:It appeared that #1379 was advocating Shotty's policy lynch. I'll look through tomorrow.
}.
If you're going to say I'm scum despite the lack of any evidence to support it, then you're going to have to come up with a working theory that fits. So far you're just calling as many people scum as you can despite contradicting evidence. I'll give you that farside could very well be scum, I can't remember a protown post from her other than a couple of the lynch Fishy ones.StrangerCoug wrote:BZZZT!You're in a closed setup and you cannot necessarily use the lack of something to prove that it doesn't exist. Who's to say that nobody blocked a kill two nights in a row?