Newbie 962 (Game Over!)
-
-
GroupThink Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 210
- Joined: April 17, 2010
-
-
GroupThink Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 210
- Joined: April 17, 2010
Overreacting already? Was my random vote, brought on by Kleedrac's hypocrisy, really that much more "precarious" than your vote to end town discussion in your very first post of the game?Cove wrote:Now that that's over, GroupThink's vote is precarious and he needs to respond to my statement about its correlation to his first statement.
Unvote
Vote: GroupThink
I second this ammendment.AQUA wrote:How about you answer the questions yourself, sir.
You and me both.kindred_spirit wrote:because that would most likely be me
i'm very reserved in posting for many reasons one i usually don't understand half of what other people are saying.
eg. i'm playing another game ona different site and everyone is going on about how such and such is mafia due to what they have said and i just don't get it. which is why i'm here to try and learnYou never pass a test of faith.-
-
GroupThink Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 210
- Joined: April 17, 2010
How so?Cove wrote:
You're the one overreacting, hate to tell you.GroupThink wrote: Overreacting already?
Because you're a hypocrite, voting not to answer questions but backpedaling to fit in.Cove wrote:Also, if I was trying to stifle town discussion, why have I answered the questions while you haven't?
I disagree.Kleedrac wrote:This is my first game here though I've played on somethingawful forums and such. I am a little concerned by the three week deadline on day 1 as I can't help but think it will promote ignoring the thread for 2.5 weeksand anyone on the block will try to promote weeks worth of conversation. Is this normal for this site? The FAQ listed the average length of a newbie game 3 weeks or did that mean day 1?No one is going to want to drop the hammer before the deadline
1. Dogtown, USARobocopter87 wrote:1. Where you from?
2. Coke or Pepsi?
3. Are you nervous?
4. Whats your playstyle?And if you've never played before what would you do in a panicky situation?
5. Are you excited to play?
6. Lynch all lurkers?
7. Lynch all Liars?
2. Toilet water
3. Somewhat, but it's natural
4. I like to sniff around alot
5. My tail's waggin
6. Only if they're scum
7. I prefer Lynch All HypocritesYou never pass a test of faith.-
-
GroupThink Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 210
- Joined: April 17, 2010
I want to win the game.Remy wrote:Anyway, I am simply looking for SOME reason to vote for a person at this point. Isn't that what we are all trying to do? Otherwise it is just a lengthy lottery. I don't see how looking for some evidence to use against a person when I place my vote (you called it "jump[ing] out at people") would point to me being scum. Townies are constantly looking for any bit of evidence to use in a conviction, if they want to lynch the right people and win the game.unvote; vote Remy
They're also going to read everything else you post and adjust accordingly.AQUA wrote:6. Honestly no, unless the mafia is retarded and can't read, then they aren't going to lurk when a lot of people are saying "lynch lurkers".
lolkindred_spirit wrote:GT ur answers to robo's question's were not cool everyone else has answered properly. then you come along and makes a joke of it. i would really like for you answer the questions properly as everyone else has.
"He didn't answer the questions right..!" "He's being shady and mysterious..!" "He doesn't drink Coke...!" It gets old.Robocopter87 wrote:In other words, I think your not being very wise with your voting power. Please provide a case on group.You never pass a test of faith.-
-
GroupThink Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 210
- Joined: April 17, 2010
-
-
GroupThink Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 210
- Joined: April 17, 2010
-
-
GroupThink Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 210
- Joined: April 17, 2010
I'm guilty of that sometimes. I don't necessarily think they're stupid, but alot of my posts tend to be one-lined.vrtra wrote:Personally, I don't find any players in this game annoying, a lot of posting does not equate to annoyance unless they are one-line stupid posts.
Why input the term "seems"? So you can backpedal later on for lack of expressed initial confidence? Why are you so alarmed by my random vote on Cove but no one else's random vote on anyone else?AKnottedRope wrote:
ThisGroupThink wrote:Cove was replaced as well; are you intentionally leaving him out?
vote Coveseemsa little defensive to me. Why are you reacting like this to a random vote?
RoboGroupThink wrote:This is absolutely ridiculous. My life won't become any less entertaining because you put "pressure" votes on me. I'm sorry. That and I have to get familiarized with all your avatars again because I could've sworn Robo was NKd on his birthday...wasNKd on his birthday, and they killed me, too, the turds. Vanilla Townie.You never pass a test of faith.-
-
GroupThink Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 210
- Joined: April 17, 2010
-
-
GroupThink Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 210
- Joined: April 17, 2010
Prolly shouldn't link ongoing games, but that's what my Wiki's for.
I also forgot to mention in reply to Cove's accusation that my "meta" indicated a shift in aligment. If he was really serious with his accusations, he would've noticed that the game in question was one I started before I signed up for this one, and, therefore, had and has my full attention. Apparently, he wasn't serious, though.
That appears to be the only reason for my lynch.You never pass a test of faith.-
-
GroupThink Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 210
- Joined: April 17, 2010
-
-
GroupThink Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 210
- Joined: April 17, 2010
I take it this means you're competent enough to stay off a mislynch D1 as scum? Would that be proper play?vrtra wrote:Hey everyone, I am one of your 2 SE's.
vrtra wrote:2. Coke or Pepsi?Coke.(Scummy)
Well that's what your response was - a stretch - and I knew no way to answer it.AKnottedRope wrote:I put it there because that's what your action seemed like. This is a huge stretch.
Is this the only reason for my lynch?GroupThink wrote:Prolly shouldn't link ongoing games, but that's what my Wiki's for.
I also forgot to mention in reply to Cove's accusation that my "meta" indicated a shift in aligment. If he was really serious with his accusations, he would've noticed that the game in question was one I started before I signed up for this one, and, therefore, had and has my full attention. Apparently, he wasn't serious, though.
That appears to be the only reason for my lynch.You never pass a test of faith.-
-
GroupThink Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 210
- Joined: April 17, 2010
I didn't know you could voluntarily ask for a replacement. Maybe I should do that in all my other games.vrtra wrote:Mod: Please replace me.
Life is just much too hectic for this game right now, hopefully my replacement will be able to devote adequate time for this game.
Sorry you couldn't be scum this time around.vrtra wrote:I liked playing scum last game
Incessant lurking isn't a reason for a lynch; it's a reason for a replacement. Flippant attitudes, or the perception thereof, aren't indicative of alignments; they're not even indicative of personalities. I replaced into too many and my main one's only just now ending.AKnottedRope wrote:
No, it's not.GT wrote:Is this the only reason for my lynch?
The reasons for your lynch include:
Incessant lurking
A flippant attitude towards the game
A disregard towards questions and votes directed at you
Thinking robo got NK'd (which you still haven't explained)
Your meta points to you being active when you're town
Any other questions?
I wouldn't call my lack of response disregard anymoreso than you'd accuse someone of withholding information after a mentally ill youth has impetuously run up and quacked at them, leaving them speechless. And RobowasNKd...and I was lynched. And RE:Meta - it points to me being more active when I'm active. At that time, I'd signed up for one game - when I entered this one, I'd signed up for six. Do the math regarding divided attention and whatnot.
Yes- 1: Which of the following do you believe to be more closely tied to Vrtra, alignment-wise: Remy, Kleedrac, or Cove?
I still stand by this.GroupThink wrote:Well that's what your response was - a stretchYou never pass a test of faith.-
-
GroupThink Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 210
- Joined: April 17, 2010
@AKR - Do you think it's plausible for you and Robo to look like scum right now?vrtra wrote:AKR seems like the best vote right now, because of his interactions/reactions with Robo and posting style.
@AKR - Do you know if anyone else on my wagon agrees with these sentiments?vrtra wrote:AKR is looking pretty bad to me right now. Mainly, he places a FoS on Robo for not voting beyond the RVS stage on page 4. A mafia would try to incite a lot of voting around so it would be easier for him to slip through the cracks and provide vague defense for votes hastily put on him. It is a good way to gauge how the town is. While this isn't a lot of necessarily verifiable and textbook material, it's my own experience from what I've seen / read.Then, he overreacts to a point made by Robo asking him (AKR) and Cove to tone it down a little bit by saying "toning it down= not scumhunting" which isn't what he was saying at all.
Why Vrtra? Did you notice what I said about him not being scum this time around?AKnottedRope wrote:None of the above. If you happen to flip town, my suspicions would lie with a Vrtra-kindred scumteam.
@AKR - Do you think we should lynch the rest of the playerlist simply because they're not posting right now?GroupThink wrote:Incessant lurking isn't a reason for a lynch; it's a reason for a replacement.You never pass a test of faith.-
-
GroupThink Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 210
- Joined: April 17, 2010
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.