Monty Python Quest for the holy grail, GAME OVER!!!

[Fishbulb]

Then, if you believe Orbiting is wrong about him, why can't you believe that I am pro-town as well? Either you believe the cop, or you don't, which is precisely why I won't vote for Loose Cannon or God since I might as well be voting for myself. Something is wrong with our cop, and it's obvious some of you see it as well.

[Werebear]

Listencouldwepleasefocusongettingroleclaimsoutofthosethecophasfingered
beforeigonutsweknowwhotheblackknightisand
wecanalwaysgetthemlatersoPLEASEcanweleaveitforanotherday?!!?

Besides, it the Black Knight had a role that could kill Arthur, don't you think he would have tried last night?

[Fishbulb]

No, there are still docs out there... Which is why the giant didn't get their kill.

[Night Stalker]

As much as I'd like to take the credit for last nights kill, as it would prove that I'm only interested in killing the evildoers, I didn't do it. There's appearently another vig in town (which is a surprise to me), but going over the movie roles, I'm guessing it's Sir Lancelot. He did wipe out nearly an entire town to resuce the "princess".

But why would a vigilante kill off Saigon? After seeing that Thoth wasn't evil, and then three good candidates, why go for an unknown? It certainly wouldn't help us today. Our resident Black Knight is starting his killing spree...

If I was last night's vigilante, I'd figure that the 3 people Orbiting fingered were likely to be lynched anyway, so why not kill someone I thought was guilty who wasn't about to get lynched?


And it's odd that the giants, and never the French, miss their kill. Is it the docs, or a role blocker, or are they limited in some other way?

Vote: Loose Cannon

. Still the scummiest of the three. And, if he's really Concord, he'd survive tonight's lynch, and we wouldn't loose a pro-town role.

[Werebear]

Mr. Mod - please fix my long post. It was intended to get a point across, but I forgot this messageboard doesn't word wrap.

[mathcam]

Unvote: Fishbulb, Vote: Loose Cannon

.

Good point, Night Stalker. Plus, Fishbulb's a talker and there's no sense in getting rid of those until we have to.

Cam

[Werebear]

*Gets frustrated*

[Fishbulb]

What is wrong with you, Werebear? Loose Cannon was one of the "guilty party", too.

I will not vote for Loose Cannon, however. I know, with my innocence, that it is likely that he is, too. Something has happened to the cop. The Knights of Ni admit to not really knowing what they do. I really think something happened to influence his results. And if it is going to take more lynches before you guys realize that, it will be too late. Just the fact that a "vigilante" took out someone not on the "confirmed" scum list shows something. Rather than take a chance, he should've sped things up by killing one of us. Instead, he takes a chance out of the remaining? I don't buy it. I bet

HE

knows that Orbiting is getting bad results, too.

(

Now

you can be frustrated, Werebear)

[mathcam]

I'm not sure why you're getting frustrated at all, Werebear? Wasn't your point that you didn't think it was worthwhile going after the Black Knight? We're not. That's Night Stalker. Am I missing something?

Cam

[Werebear]

The frustration with the Black Knight is mathcam's insistence that he is evil. He very well may be, but I think we have better information to find. I was hoping for roleclaims from ALL three on the hotseat, in the hopes one of them might slip up. Oh well, there's always tomorrow.

And I'm not changing this again.

Unvote: blah blah blah, Vote: Loose Cannon

[mathcam]

Oh, I was mostly joking in my top post. I agree that although he may be evil (and I seem to think more strongly than others that he is) it would be silly for us to go after him instead of one of "the three." Ever since then, I've just been debating which of the three to vote for.

Cam

[Macros]

3 Loose Cannon (Night Stalker, Mathcam, Werebear)
1 Fishbulb (Darkblade)

[Loose Cannon]

I won't survive the lynch NS, my role only allows me to survive a night attack (and I'm not even notified when I do).

[Night Stalker]

I was under the same impression when you wanted to lynch me, but I survived. Does your role specifically say it's only night attacks?

I agree with Werebear, though - even if LC is innocent, role claims from the other suspects is a good idea. As Fishbulb pointed out, it's possible that the Knights who say Ni or some other role messed up an investigation or two - but unless that happened every night, chances would still be good that at least one of the above is guilty.

[rite]

vote: Loose Cannon

I like the logic behind this bandwagon-o-matic

[Dragon Slayer]

Stop this! I know Loose Cannon is just the innocent Pasty/Concorde. And his role ability is also basically true. Stop voting him. There's obviously somthing wrong with Orbiting results and lynched these people just to find out won't do any good when I can tell you for a fact that one (Loose Cannon) is definetly innocent. I will not yet reveal my role.

Unvote Fishbulb

.

-DS

[Night Stalker]

Then why did you vote Fishbulb in the first place?

Big FOS: Dragon Slayer.

<scrolls back>

Wait, did you even vote him?

[Dragon Slayer]

ARE YOU KIDDING ME!? I don't believe I ever voted Loose Cannon- definetly not after his claim of Concorde. What the heck is that FOS for? Coming out to stop the maddness!? Jeez, my frustration is almost tempting me to "sit back and watch the stupidity continue to unfold."

-DS

[Dragon Slayer]

Oh, the vote on Fishbulb, I wanted a claim. To check the possiblilty that one just might be guilty. I see how that's suspicious- alright. But still, I'm telling you that Concorde/Pasty is in the game. Loose Cannon's ability makes sense with the info I have about the role.

-DS

[God]

Orbiting, you are getting very clear good/evil results, right?

hmmm....

Last night I investigated bane221 - based on my result, I assume he's a Knight of Ni, or some other sort of role-blocker.

All of the results I've talked about so far (except for the late, lamented Thoth) included the idea that the person in question was wishing to delay or thwart the quest, as well as the idea that they were potentially dangerous to me.

This one only included delay and not harm, so I'm assuming that he's not mafia, but not a knight of camelot either.

Does this quote not bother anyone else? He is not getting Guilty or Innocent here...
And why did you not investigate Night Stalker after the full day of discussing his guilt?

[God]

Sorry to double post, but i would like to know what result you got for LC when you investigated him?

Would Concorde be considered someone who would want to thwart the quest? What about delay it..?

[mathcam]

Ah, jeez. Orbiting, what's up? Come on. All of it. Keeping part of your role secret is good to an extent, but if we end up doing stupid things that we could have prevented as a town because of it, then it's not worth it.

But all in all, that last God post reeked of scumminess. Questioning Concorde after DS has cleared him? Though DS is a little suspicious himself...but he sounded pretty convincing in that post of his. In any case, DS is sure Concord is in the game, and it's been claimed by Loose Cannon with no contradictions. What else is there to say?

We're getting to the point where there may be such a

high

proportion of evil left that wrong moves become instantly fatal. So I now think we

should

force God and Fishbulb to reveal.

Cam

[Dragon Slayer]

Anything to figure out what's going on with Orbiting.

Fos Orbiting

for confusing the heck out of all of us. Hmm, I don't know why, mathcam, but I just got a scummy sorta feel from

your

post. Eh, but what can I say. I

do

believe me.

-DS

[Night Stalker]

Dragon Slayer, in that previous post, did you mean to vote Fishbulb, instead of unvote him? Since I can't find a previous vote for him from you today...

[Dragon Slayer]

God my head hurts. When you said that I voted fishbulb I thought that I had. I think I was getting my games confused. Plus I was frustrated.

Oh, the vote on Fishbulb, I wanted a claim. To check the possiblilty that one just might be guilty. I see how that's suspicious- alright.

That was the only reasoning I could give to a vote I would make on him. However, it turns out I didn't vote him. I was only suspicious of him for a while. You're the one that made me think that I had voted him, so don't use that ti make me look suspicious again. Therefore, I'd like the suspicions about me to stop if they're because of my supposed "vote" on fishbulb. That was never true.