Chronopie wrote:The numbers I ran were the probability that the scum tailor coincided with the sole cop investigation.
Only tangentially connected with the hypocopping...
Are you implying the cop's results to be unreliable? If so, what's the point of assessing probabilities?
Deer wrote:chnorek wrote:XScorp is playing like a jester. Either he is scum or stupid but doesnt seem to be really as stupid as he looks here. That makes him scum in my eyes.
This is scummy as all hell.
Really? How so?
kunkstar7 wrote:How is a non-random hypocop scummy?
I need to read up on this. What exactly
is
a hypocop? A hypothetical cop investigation...? (Googled to no avail..)
Miyu wrote:Groupthink. For what reason did you vote for Chnorek?
I wanted you to call me scummy for providing no reasoning.
Shattered Viewpoint wrote:But, IMO, scum wouldn't act like an idiot (hello, WIFOM!) so, I don't think that Chrono would be an obv-idiot.
I don't see how he's acting like an idiot.
chnorek wrote:ups, sory for not posting.
You forgot me.
XScorpion wrote:Way to be completely vague and useless to town. Give real answers.
This also means that you don't suspect SV. Any particular reason you think he is less likely to be scum than the 3 other phantom people?
You honestly need my suspicions to make a decision on your own?
Shattered Viewpoint wrote:And, given chnorek's recent scum!post, I'll
unvote
Vote: chnorek
Well I guess I'll
unvote
Vote: chronopie
You never pass a test of faith.