I didn't notice the vote on Jahudo in vote count 56 until just now. Yes, I probably would have given serious thought to lynching yesterday despite it being MyLo once I saw the Jahudo vote. The ghosts may have known something the rest of us didn't, such as some role information that meant we had a chance to make an extra lynch. (But a single vote on Jahudo might have only meant that one of the players didn't understand why it's typically good to not lynch during MyLo, so I'd have wanted a bit more dialogue to understand what they were thinking.)VP Baltar wrote:Hero - had the ghosts come to some kind of concensus yesterday, would you have lynched that person? How much stock do you put in their opinions from yesterday?
Can you explain the reference to me here?Porkens 616 wrote: it would have been super easy to just jump on my wagon (see Herod).
Porkens 616 wrote:He [ToD] did replace in, so that's probably a mark against him (if I'm trying to be consistant) BUT it's not like Sera who promised a reread and then quit.
And then she quit.Pom 542 wrote:Will reread Porkens.
Who do you think was voting for you out of laziness?Porkens 616 wrote: BUUUUUUUUUUUT probably since he's one of the few people not on my ass out of sheer laziness, I have some fuzzy feelings for him today.
Because nobody was saying a damn word. I gave 24hrs notice. In that time I expected either the ghosts to reach an obvious concensus and we could discuss or living players to say something useful. Neither happened and I felt No Lynch was where we were headed anyhow. No sense in waiting another two or three days of nothing for it to happen.Hero wrote:Why did you hammer the No Lynch after the Jahudo vote?
1. No.Porkens wrote:It's Herod and Percy, just like it's always been Herod and Percy.
Herod I don't have time to look at the posts you quoted, but I think your splitting hairs or overgeneralizing or something.
That's good.Porkens wrote:Brazil was sooooo good
Long Roller Derby weekend. It was great!VP wrote:d3x - where are you going, where have you been?
You jumped on my <easy/popular> wagon when you replaced in.Herodotus wrote:Can you explain the reference to me here?Porkens 616 wrote: it would have been super easy to just jump on my wagon (see Herod).
You are obviously stretching for minutia to hold against me. I never even saw that bit about rereading me.Herodotus wrote:Porkens 616 wrote:He [ToD] did replace in, so that's probably a mark against him (if I'm trying to be consistant) BUT it's not like Sera who promised a reread and then quit.And then she quit.Pom 542 wrote:Will reread Porkens.
Now I don't agree that it's a scumtell, but you're obviously not getting your facts right.
[/quote]Herodotus wrote:Who do you think was voting for you out of laziness?Porkens 616 wrote: BUUUUUUUUUUUT probably since he's one of the few people not on my ass out of sheer laziness, I have some fuzzy feelings for him today.
ok, fair enough.d3x wrote:K, I'm back.
Long Roller Derby weekend. It was great!VP wrote:d3x - where are you going, where have you been?
I'm willing to put the game up for a Pork Lynch. It makes the most sense to me atm. I'd like some discussion before throwing down, though. Mainly, I don't like that assuming PorkTown and PercyTown, the remaining 2 Scum would just have to log on and Hammer the game to Town Lose. I think it'sveryreckless play and it's more likely to come from Scum than Town imo.
That said, I'm not buying PorkTown. I believe VPTown {unless the team's VP/Percy- which I have serious problems with} due in part to VP posting after Pork's Vote.
The wagon that I started. Right.Porkens wrote:You jumped on my <easy/popular> wagon when you replaced in.Herodotus wrote:Can you explain the reference to me here?Porkens 616 wrote: it would have been super easy to just jump on my wagon (see Herod).
What I'm holding against you is that at least some of your opinions are not based on reality. It's frustrating.Porkens wrote:You are obviously stretching for minutia to hold against me. I never even saw that bit about rereading me.Herodotus wrote:Porkens 616 wrote:He [ToD] did replace in, so that's probably a mark against him (if I'm trying to be consistant) BUT it's not like Sera who promised a reread and then quit.And then she quit.Pom 542 wrote:Will reread Porkens.
Now I don't agree that it's a scumtell, but you're obviously not getting your facts right.
I'll agree about Dramonic being lazy, but other than him, each person on your day 3 wagon made separate, solid points about how scummy you were.Porkens 616 wrote:No one had a decent case against me; the votes were piling on due to a lack of anything better to go off of. Juhado and Dramonic were lazy (herod and percy were scum)Herodotus wrote:Who do you think was voting for you out of laziness?Porkens 616 wrote: BUUUUUUUUUUUT probably since he's one of the few people not on my ass out of sheer laziness, I have some fuzzy feelings for him today.
