Innnteresting.
And how does
Its a mix of nagging doubts detract much more from TBM scum than Nik scum and thinking Nik will be better at talking his way out of something.Oso wrote:@FurryNot arguing with your vote. As I am convinced that TBM is scum and since I wouldn't be the best person to look at his play in an unbiased light at this point, can you give any points to consider as to why TBM might be town?Furry wrote:Nik-TBM is looking like a very good pairing to me actually. I like nik lynch a little more though given his recent change on the TBM front, as I can see this interaction coming from Nik(S)-TBM(S) or Nik(S)-TBM(T)
I completely agree that he should.Furry wrote:TBM should claim though.
I don't know if he would actually do that without you claiming first but with 4 votes on you at the moment, you should probably start doing something to get some of them off because you are effectively at L-1 right now. One more vote on you, with Nik seeing that vote before anyone can unvote well....you can see where that might lead.Nikanor Post - 346 wrote:If someone puts TBM at L-1 I'll hammer.
See actually, this is the post that made me want a Nik lynch. Go through his posts and watch his opinions of TBMs slot, it actually is quite entertaining.Oso wrote:In case you didn't notice TBM, Nikanor said this earlier:
Nikanor Post - 346 wrote:If someone puts TBM at L-1 I'll hammer.
I'll read Nik in iso concentrating on the TBM slot. See if I see the same thing as you.Furry wrote:See actually, this is the post that made me want a Nik lynch. Go through his posts and watch his opinions of TBMs slot, it actually is quite entertaining.
Is that why I'm voting for you?Midnight's Sorrow wrote:Why should I be bothered by a vote that was made because my predecessor 'lurked'?
Is that why I'm voting for you?Midnight's Sorrow wrote:Why should I be bothered by a vote that was made because of jumping on something small, that holds nothing to my alignment?
Or is that why I'm voting for you?Midnight's Sorrow wrote:Most certainly why should a vote that has no reason other then to(Seemingly) be crass??
TheButtonmen wrote:I'm implying that I think your reason for not wanting to vote someone due to worrying about acusations of OMGUS as opposed to not thinking they are scum; seems quite scummy to me.Midnight's Sorrow wrote:I think I'm a lot more interested in what your trying to imply TBM.
Unvote; Vote: Midnight
And why, precisely are you so eager to speedlynch TBM.havingfitz wrote:Still v/LA. Checking in for a few minutes and not seeing anything worth commenting on other than I'm surprised by the fact TBM has not been lynched yet. wtf?
So many things wrong with this post; to start off with he's willing to blind hammer me but wants to distance himself from it by saying he's just doing what the majority wants.Nikanor wrote:I said I'd hammer TBM because a) Hoopla was upset and I wanted to make her feel better and b) I have this weird tendency to be wrong most of the time. I figure that if the majority wants it, I can go with a Buttonlynch.
Also, I'd like TBM to claim.
Unvote.
The worrying about OMGUSing is something Midnight does as town. I see no reason to keep a vote on someone who won't be lynched anyway.
Fyi; your not voting him.Midnight's Sorrow wrote:Just because I like to go into a in-depth summary of exactlywhythey don't bother me, means they bother me??
Not really Gwyn. Not by the longest shot and yard ;)
Yep. I'm liking my vote where its at.
Nik wrote:Like, you know that feeling where you just know that it's two townies going at it in a big argument? That's how I feel about them. That Oso and RH are both town.
The most interesting thing about these two posts is that there was only one namedrop of TBM from Nik in the meantime inNik wrote:If someone puts TBM at L-1 I'll hammer.
....
I said I'd hammer TBM because a) Hoopla was upset and I wanted to make her feel better and b) I have this weird tendency to be wrong most of the time. I figure that if the majority wants it, I can go with a Buttonlynch.
Which is a decent suspicion reason, but this is ingored in entirety when pressure is put on TBM later in the game. Instead its an appeal to athority and pre-blame shift stance.Also, I'm required to point out that TBM is assuming that Jacob actually is a vig.
Same thing that caught JS, going to be happy as a clam if it caught two scum. Lets not forget that Nik has a town read on Reck here. Not quite as bad as JS (which is why he was the priority lynch) but still bad.Jacob, let's compromise. If Slepz flips town I'll help you lynch Reck tomorrow. Sound good?
This was a massive uneasy feeling post when I read it first and never have been able to shake that feeling off. You can compare it to the old "dang we lost a PR" type tell, but it feels like scum trying to get a "my reads were right, im so town" type post in. Maybe its also because I didnt have that much of a town read on reck as well.Aw.
Poor Reck. And he was so townie, too.
Amazing cop out. Slepz was a flaker, lurking is continually getting prodded and posting once or twice in between them, or even active lurking. Making a few posts followed by disappearing isnt lurking. Its all you can talk about in regards to this slot, and for the most part the entire game. It does remind me of the old game where we were scum together and most of your cases were lurking based. Also like the current interest in the TBM wagon, you showed previously nonexistant interest (to lynch) in wagons that showed up.q21: I have a burning desire to lynch Slepz because I like lynching lurkers. There's no way to get a read off them other than by lynching them. And if we show scum that lurking isn't safe on day one, then maybe they'll actually be active for a change, unlike every other game which seems to have the scum lurking to victory.