Mini 988 - Small Town Mafia GAME OVER

[Exilon]

i plaid about 4 games on different forums and just whanted to see how i did in a small game in this forum

Interesting, I have two completed games on this site and only one on another. I guess that excuses me from playing badly.

I'm sticking with Exilon right now.

That was quite scummy.

To clarify, you're voting for me, therefore I'm your supposed top suspect.

"That"=? In your ISO I can only find my initial statement and my missed tags. Are you saying that alone is scummier than everything else you've seen in the thread?

Interesting.

Butterfly, meh. I don't see it. Plus Cueti and David have yet to post. Soemone is too eager...

I've gotta say that Zach is looking bad. Some good comments mixed in, but: bandwagoning, being pedantic, asking questions without adding anything, etc.

What is it that you don't agree with Butterfly's case?
Who's that someone you are talking about?
Why is Cueti and David not posting relevant to an ongoing wagon and the information we get from it?
By the way, why is bandwagoning a reason for suspicion on Zach?
Am I scummy for asking these questions without adding anything?

[jasonT1981]

Just posting to say I'm here, and will contribute once my game of DotA ends.

why sign up to a game, if you cant play until the one your already in ends?

can you not play more than one at a time?

how long do you expect before your other game ends and you can make vaild contributions to this game?

[Concerned]

Dota is a pc game, lasts about an hour max per game .

[jasonT1981]

Also, right now I see no real problem with Zachs play... we have played together many times and He usually plays like this. He is playing to his town meta so far.

[jasonT1981]

Dota is a pc game, lasts about an hour max per game .

Ohhhhh.. my mistake, sorry I thought it was another mafia game.

[0x1de]

I'm sticking with Exilon right now.

That was quite scummy.

To clarify, you're voting for me, therefore I'm your supposed top suspect.

"That"=? In your ISO I can only find my initial statement and my missed tags. Are you saying that alone is scummier than everything else you've seen in the thread?

Interesting.

Yep. It was your first statement.

Butterfly, meh. I don't see it. Plus Cueti and David have yet to post. Soemone is too eager...

I've gotta say that Zach is looking bad. Some good comments mixed in, but: bandwagoning, being pedantic, asking questions without adding anything, etc.

What is it that you don't agree with Butterfly's case?
Who's that someone you are talking about?
Why is Cueti and David not posting relevant to an ongoing wagon and the information we get from it?
By the way, why is bandwagoning a reason for suspicion on Zach?
Am I scummy for asking these questions without adding anything?

I meant that I

don't

think Butterfly is scum.
Zach and Concerned seem eager for an early lynch.
I'm just concened that we might lynch someone whilst the lurkers go unquestioned. Scum want a quick lynch...
Asking relavent questions is sound. Irrelevant questions less so.

[Zachrulez]

Who said anything about a quick lynch?

[Exilon]

Zach took the words out of my mouth.

I meant that I don't think Butterfly is scum.
Zach and Concerned seem eager for an early lynch.
I'm just concened that we might lynch someone whilst the lurkers go unquestioned. Scum want a quick lynch...

I was talking about the case on Buterfly - sorry. I thought it was clear :s

No, true scum want a quick mislynch, but do you think that's dangerous on Day 1? If someone speedlynches, then it's actually good for us as they'll be dead the next day. Not only that, but do you think conscious town would let a quicklynch happen?

I can't really see your concern on that post, actually. And it's been, what, half-a-day since the game began and you're already calling people lurkers?

Needed question:

Where / When do Zach and Concerned show eagerness for a quicklynch?

'Cause I don't really see it and I find it funny how you say that and Concerned is one of the few people who are not supporting a Butterfly wagon.

[DavidParker]

Vote: Zach

Seems to not be contributing all that much, and just asking questions without really trying to help out town (ironic since I've been afk and not contributing but hey!). Apart from that, i don't get a huge scum vibe from butterfly, so not too keen on a lynch on him atm.

[Super Smash Bros. Fan]

I find it odd that Concerned and 0x1de are already calling people lurkers. We've just barely started and now is not the time to call people lurkers.

By the way, are you gonna fakeclaim in this game as well?

No I will not. I will claim my real role.

Re: your case on Butterfly: Relax, it's only page 4, nothing that warrants "your play in this game has been terrible" xD
Now, where was it?

The case? I already have one on The Butterfly, do you want me to dig it up?

[Zachrulez]

Vote: Zach

Seems to not be contributing all that much, and just asking questions without really trying to help out town (ironic since I've been afk and not contributing but hey!).

Try again.

[Exilon]

Phew, SSBF. You have no idea how that relieves me.

The case? I already have one on The Butterfly, do you want me to dig it up?

Huh? No, you got my sentence wrong. "Now, where was it?" was me talking to myself while looking for the "pyramid" thing.

[Zachrulez]

FTR, concise posting is NOT non-contribution.

[jasonT1981]

but... asking questions of others is helpful to the town

by asking questions, you get reactions.... reactions help the game.

Also, you say he is not contributing much but in the same sentance say he is asking questions... is that not, contributing?

[0x1de]

Achmm.

I guess I'm not used to the number of posts. Page 5 and I'm calling lurkers, but so...

Seems like wagons are fine for scumhunting. Just a bit worried when Ex got to L-2 or L-1, whatever.

[Zachrulez]

But I didn't meet the arbitrary post length requirements, that state that my post must be at least
^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V

this big to count as contribution.

[0x1de]

Don't think we can all measure up to you.

[Zachrulez]

@Parker: Position on Exilon? You commented on the Butterfly wagon but not on the Exilon wagon.

[Super Smash Bros. Fan]

@Zachrulez: Um, Exilon's bandwagon was fueled primarily from RVS comments, not on scumminess. Why is Exilon's bandwagon worth commenting on? The only notable things were that Exilon self-voted and got put at L-1. The bandwagon is gone I think.

[Zachrulez]

Don't think we can all measure up to you.

Look, it's just the way I play. I've had a very similar discussion in a past game about my posting style and had to go to great length to explain how I'm actually contributing because people interpret my short concise posting as non contribution seemingly seeing only the length rather than the content.

I like to think that I make my thoughts and positions clear regardless, which is the most important thing to get across regardless of how you post.

[Zachrulez]

@Zachrulez: Um, Exilon's bandwagon was fueled primarily from RVS comments, not on scumminess. Why is Exilon's bandwagon worth commenting on? The only notable things were that Exilon self-voted and got put at L-1. The bandwagon is gone I think.

Actually the point that led to his wagon was a valid point. I thought it was a solid basis for an early bandwagon, and I didn't like his early posting. (Particularly the self vote.)

Since then though, I feel he has redeemed himself somewhat through the content of his posting.

0x1de at least still thinks there's a solid basis for a Exilon wagon, and I think there's still a few votes on him too. (We haven't had a vote count yet, so I lost track of how many.)

So I think that it's still a wagon worth commenting on.

[jasonT1981]

Id rather have short posts... than mastan type posts

[DavidParker]

Well I took part on the Exilon wagon. I'm surprised it got to L-1, to be honest, I like to get games moving as I come from a site whre day phases last 1-2 real life days. So activity is usually big and stuff gets done in shrot periods of time so i was happy with a bandwagon. Games here move a lot more methodically and... slow!

The exilon wagon may be useful to look at later when we know more, although I think not much can be said of it atm as it was mostly a joke. ALthough someone was about to put him at L-1 in their post then changed their mind mid post. That seems possible as scum trying to get a quick lynch, but then not wanting to seem to obvious.

[Zachrulez]

Parker, if you want your vote on me to count, you need to unvote Exilon first, and then vote me.

[Exilon]

Achmm.

I guess I'm not used to the number of posts. Page 5 and I'm calling lurkers, but so...

Seems like wagons are fine for scumhunting.

Just a bit worried when Ex got to L-2 or L-1, whatever.

Ok, so I had a power-out which killed my post, thankfully it didn't kill my notes.

I don't really know how to comment on this post. So this is basically.. an apology? How nice. Yet you don't change your vote or answer what you've been asked.

Namely:

Where / When do Zach and Concerned show eagerness for a quicklynch?

Worried when I got to L2 or L1? Worried about me, which you believe is scum? Or did you switch names and you're talking about Butterfly, which is at L2? Either way, yeah, your post totally reeks of worry of a quicklynch. (not)

Fos: Ox1de

because I can't vote for two people at the same time and I want to get more juice out of Butterfly's wagon.

Btw, I believe concision is pro-town. Not only that, but forcing myself to be concise helps me grow as an individual because concision often gets your point across much better than wall posting. And it takes less time to write.