My Milked Eek wrote:Not to repeat everything thats been said about his posts , but yeah he totally folded under pressure.
Add superlurking too, by his own admission.
Is this the case against zajnet? lol. And people want him to claim?
No, ignore Raivann. Here's good reasons.
Cove wrote:That last statement towards Doombunny now applies to you too, why no vote? You seem wishy-washy on the topic of SK, yet Raivann and myself are your top two suspects? Weak wagon support without follow through, with a side of added distancing.
Unvote Doombunny9. Vote Zajnet
Left out Cove's quote in this next one since it's right above this:
Parama wrote:Zajnet wrote:
I didn't vote because I didn't know which one of you to vote for, and now I do. Your response was that of a townie.
Vote: Raivann
OOH. Appealing to an attacker aren't we? I see where this is going.
unvote, vote: Zajnet
Again in response to the above:
Parama wrote:Zajnet wrote:
Please outline how scum-me would do that, while town-me wouldn't? I intentionally didn't vote to see how people reacted, and he reacted in a very pro-town manner, so I voted Rai.
As soon as you were called out, you appealed to the person who called you out by calling them townie and then proceeding to vote like they asked you to. That looks more like an appeal than anything.
Follow-up to Cove's post:
Incognito wrote:Cove, that makes infinitely more sense. I can see what you're talking about now. I wouldn't call it distancing, but he's basically calling two people scummy for thinking something is suspicious but then he claims that he himself is suspicious of that same thing as well. It's like he's trying to keep his options open.
SaintKerrigan wrote:
Zajnet wrote:I'm going to have to /barn the people that have said that Raivann and Cove appear scummy from the SK joking thing.
That being said, I wouldn't be surprised if SK ends up being scum. In my experience, scum claims that early, even in obvious joking form, are driven by one of three things: a true joke (the least likely), a guilty conscience (also not very likely), or a scum trying to get townie points because what scum would claim scum? (the most likely). That being said, SK's responses have made me feel a lot better about him.
Excuse me? First you say you wouldn't be surprised if I'm scum because of my joke, then you say my responses make you feel better about me? How, exactly? Also, what is this "experience" you claim regarding "scum claims"?
Zajnet wrote:I didn't vote because I didn't know which one of you to vote for, and now I do. Your response was that of a townie.
Why was Cove's response town in your opinion? Why didn't you just select one of those two to vote for and see how it went? It's not like you thought they were mutually exclusive from being scum.
Zajnet wrote:I intentionally didn't vote to see how people reacted, and he reacted in a very pro-town manner, so I voted Rai.
Wait a minute. First you say you didn't vote because you weren't sure who to vote for. Now you say you were intentionally withholding your vote to observe reactions? Would you mind explaining why this isn't changing your story?
Zajnet wrote:What would you rather I say? I said exactly what I was thinking, that you and Rai were seeming scum but if SaintK flipped scum it would make the two of you appear much more town.
Except that wasn't what you said.
And tbh it looks like he's playing the "I'll post tomorrow, but tomorrow never comes" game right now. I understand that life happens but one little post full of responses can't take too terribly long, can it?
So MME here's the good stuff. A few people on the wagon shouldn't be there but the goal is a good one so I can't blame them. Now you understand the case, now you see why he's at L-1. So if you blow off the case based on one single post again I will lynch you next when Zajnet flips scum.
BTW, this is just things that people have already said, I don't feel like typing up a whole case myself.
