Pittbunny -4- ZazieR, Amished, PranaDevil, MehPlusRawr
With 9 alive, it takes 5 to lynch
dang it Amished, you got to this too fast for me to say it.Amished wrote:Also: since I'm done waiting and this might as well come out:
If Pitt *was* a vig, then he'd be pro-town. Pro-town people don't have a need to switch around votes/hold them back. Vigs in particular tend to kill those who seem most suspicious, but after saying that Pitt was wavering between Soc and CMAR (indicating that he thought those were the most suspicious) he doesn't go after CMAR at all, but focuses on SttB.
This doesn't mesh at all with you saying that Soc/CMAR were the two most suspicious players, especially with your vote not being on CMAR right now, or anyone, for that matter.Pittbunny wrote:I'd like the Doctor, if any exists, to start protecting Prana, because he was right. =/
I thought that I had shot Socrates, but looking back at my PMs I found that I had chosen Ani/Nacho slot Sunday. Which means, essentially, that I've screwed myself over regardless of alignment (lynch all liars + existing conditions). I am a vig. I will flip as such, and do not mind that you will lynch me. Frankly, it was an oversight that I should have doublechecked before posting on the forums, especially with a four-day gap. Obviously, I'd prefer if an alternative method was found to deduce my alignment (or at least force myself to shoot in favor of town's opinion), but I understand that a lynch is both the most rational and expedient method to find out. My given rationale for a Socrates shot was as stated above, and I restate that I almost always find CMAR scummy. The same is unfortunately true for Ani's method of play, which is likely why I resulted in shooting Ani/Nacho.
I is a fail-vig. Smite me for my insolence. =/
Well, I'm getting lynched aren't I? If it pleases you, here's a vote that won't matter:hasdgfas wrote: This doesn't mesh at all with you saying that Soc/CMAR were the two most suspicious players, especially with your vote not being on CMAR right now, or anyone, for that matter.
I'm trying, I'm sorry. It has been a perfect storm of distractions.Amished wrote:@HoMoo: Sorry? You should post moar so you can get rid of this bad feeling I have of you.
What does "I respect Pitt's vote on me" even mean? It sounds like you're trying your hardest to not OMGUS vote him while leaving avenues open to think he's scum later. You do the same thing with Amished, leaving both options open so you can call him either town or scum. What do you hate about the hider speculation, who do you hate for it, do you find it scummy? These are all things that you left out of your post. This post is entirely "I am going to look like town and make 'pro-town points' to try to keep speculation off of me." So is your vote. It's a bunch of buzzwords, yet there's no reasoning behind them.CryMeARiver wrote:Well this is now interesting isn't it?
I believe PittBunny, I believe Prana and I think MPR is scum for bandwagoning late with bad reasoning and noob scum meta.
It is true, Pitt usually finds me scummy as per being me. Truth be told, I usually find him scummy as well.
I always get a town feeling from Amished, even if he's scum. So that's that.
IREALLYhate the hider speculation though
I respect Pitt's vote on me, as I haven't exactly been active in this game.
Vote: MPR
Back to this. You mention Soc's lack of posting at the end of the game. What did you think of the lack of posting from Cry and GroupThink at the end of the previous day?Pitt wrote:As to why I chose Socrates as part of a final pool: strong posting content followed by a tapering of meaningful content/relevance. I'm of the opinion that it isn't hard for scum to play as town would for at least D1, and the gradual loss of argument to nearly non-existant (especially for someone taking the moniker of a philosopher) was confusing for me. Having not been immersed in the game on a real-time basis, I suppose I failed to realize the flow of momentum that usually surrounds posting content, and mistook lack of content due to a loss of momentum for scum failing to continue playing as hard-town.
1. Scummy but typical from Cry, and terrible from GT. Hence my thought to claim ASAP, because of the uphill battle I'd have to fight with two scummy predecessors.ZazieR wrote: Back to this. You mention Soc's lack of posting at the end of the game. What did you think of the lack of posting from Cry and GroupThink at the end of the previous day?
I just went into detail why the bus driver theory was very likely untrue, just to see that Pitt is now claiming something else ._.
But I will point out again the last bit of it. That I find it very interesting that it was Pitt who kept bringing up the possibility of being redirected.
As for the new claim:
-Why did you decide to check it now?
-Why kill Nacho? You stated that you think that Ani and Cry look always scummy. Yet, Ani was replaced at the end of day. So why Nacho and not Cry? Also, you stated at the start that it was between Soc and Cry. How come you didn't mention Ani here?
-I'm not liking the doc direction, the soft direction for a information ability to target you and the 'I am willing to shoot myself or be lynched myself' mentality.
As for your next post, I find it interesting that you vote Cry, while before you stated that you caught scum in Amished and that you always see Cry as scummy. So why Cry over Amished?
Interesting word choice. It was scummy from Soc and it was scummy from Cry. But when we're talking about GroupThink, it's classified as 'terrible'. Want to elaborate on the choice of words?Pitt wrote:1. Scummy but typical from Cry, and terrible from GT.
Flip me and you'll know for sure.ZazieR wrote:Confirmed ability isn't confirmed allignment. Isn't that right, Pitt?
No, it's not stupid at all. It's either keeping to your statament that you killed a player which some players had a good impression of and a different claimed ability mismatching or stating that you made a mistake when claiming. Which one looks better?
Add that Hider has different meanings, making it easy for Pitt to lie if he's scum.
1. A hider could be killed when the player he has targeted is killed.Prana wrote:So tell me, you are saying a hider has different meanings to make it easy for Pitt to lie. Tell me 2 examples of these other meanings that would allow Pitt to lie.
It's worth noting that I know, 100%, that Pitt visited Nacho, which means he cannot be only claiming to have targetted Nacho.
Yet, you had no problems calling your predecessors scummy in a different post. Nice try.Pitt wrote:I use terrible in GT's case because I know GT's alignment - mine.
Oh really, Pitt?Pittbunny wrote:Guy. Also, there's a simple way for me to prove my alignment.
Would you like me to lynch myself? It'll be fun, you'll get to see how wrong you are, and CMAR gets to walk for a night on his absurdist comments.