Mini 989 - Disgaea Mafia Episode 2 (Game Over!)

[Nachomamma8]

Content-laden? Excuse me, are we reading the same game?

[Iecerint]

I certainly hope so, though I'll grant I'm not certain of whether you're reading it.

[UncertainKitten]

Content laden my ass. I could probably compress every fucking wall in this thread to one or two paragraphs, if that. Short ones, probably.

[Iecerint]

Whatever. I couldn't.

[UncertainKitten]

Well of course not. It's in your interest to obfuscate your points as best you can. You know, being scum and all :V.

[Iecerint]

Um, no. High content is pro-town, if a little more work for people who can't be arsed to play the game. Lurking is anti-town. At best.

Also, if you really think I'm scum, you should want me to post as much as possible so that you can evaluate my thought process, etc.

[UncertainKitten]

Posting a lot is fine. Posting walls that DON'T HAVE HIGH CONTENT isn't.

And your walls do not.

I love how you are trying to confuse the issue ^-^.

[Iecerint]

Uh, show me a "wallpost" of mine that is "without content." I'd say to demonstrate such a pattern, but I'm skeptical you can find just one.

And explain how I'm managing simultaneous "without content" back-and-forths with 2 separate players?

[UncertainKitten]

Another strawman.

I never said without content.

I said without high content.

Why are you hiding behind misinterpretation, Iec? Can't prove your case with the actual words used?

[Iecerint]

You CLEARLY said "high content" in an attempt to mock that I'd just used the same phrase. Any normal person reading our exchange understands that your point is an implicit belief that my posts are vapid.

What was the first strawman, so long as we're playing your game?

I love how you ignored the ACTUAL point of my post, which is that low activity is scummy, not high. Attacking someone for high activity is bullshit.

[Iecerint]

INB4 a bogus claim that she's not attacking me for high activity, but for low "signal:noise" ratio.

[TheButtonmen]

@Volk:

:insert argument from other game about discussions of playstyles:

@RBT:

Thoughts on Iec?

@Mod:

Can we get a replacment for Foobert? He has 3 posts all game and the last of which was 8 days ago.

[Kise]

TBM, why are you dodging me?

[Riceballtail]

@RBT:

Thoughts on Iec?

Who cares about him when we have obvscum KTB?

[TheButtonmen]

TBM, why are you dodging me?

....really?

I already mocked your pushing of flavour while ignoring in-thread content.

You got anything else?

[Kthxbye]

Alright, finally done with this horrid week at work and ready to get back into the game. I see I've missed A LOT. I'll start where I left off and go from there after some sleep.

[UncertainKitten]

INB4 a bogus claim that she's not attacking me for high activity, but for low "signal:noise" ratio.

Cept that's EXACTLY what you have, therefore it's not bullshit.

FURTHER, I wasn't mocking your high content claim, I was saying it was clearly bullshit.

Quit trying to weasel out with wordplay and ACTUALLY DEFEND YOUR POINTS!

Oh wait, YOU CAN'T!

CONFIRM VOTE IECERINT!

Unless you plan to actually address the issue, I want you DEAD.

[UncertainKitten]

/me rereads the exchange

Um, yeah. Any normal person would realize that I'm saying you're trying to inflate your posts, but they aren't necessarily completely vapid. Just not as content laden as you'd like us to think. The way you are responding to my criticisms of your walls REEKS of scum though.

[Iecerint]

My posts are no longer than they need to be to respond to the numerous questions and implications directed at me + rhetoric/logic for my position + asking my own questions.

[Iecerint]

Also, UK/Nacho, to clarify -- who is/are the wallposters?

[Nachomamma8]

You, MoI, and Volk.

And you really need to explain this:

INB4 a bogus claim that she's not attacking me for high activity, but for low "signal:noise" ratio.

Please.

[UncertainKitten]

Volk is getting a pass since he's catching up and his walls actually haven't been too far off. MoI and Iec ARE pretty bad about them though. I think I will do a review of their walls to confirm my initial feelings of too much noise.

[Iecerint]

I just reread my posts to make sure I wasn't making it up. I count no more than 10 noise posts, and that number is counting useful-but-perhaps-not-necessary EBWOPs. UK's unsupported claim that my posts are fluffy because they are long -- when, as the player under scrutiny, I SHOULD be posting a lot -- does not follow. It's nice that she says she'll reread, though.

If you'd read my exchanges with volk, you might notice bits where his walls have been off.

One thought -- the scrutiny on me is too broad to have that many scum on my wagon, it seems like. So...I dunno whether people just don't like reading my posts, or what.

I MISS WHEN EVERYONE THOUGHT I WAS AN EASY TOWN READ FOR POSTING ALL THE TIME CHRIST. <_<

[TheButtonmen]

@RBT:

Thoughts on Iec?

Who cares about him when we have obvscum KTB?

I hear that disregarding everything save one person may in fact not be the best plan; crazy I know.

Also only giving your opinion / reads on one person is making me all suspcious like.

[MagnaofIllusion]

UNVOTE; VOTE:KTB

Come back and die please.

Is your ‘case’ here on KTB that his vote for you based on your chronic lurking is scummy?

@UK and Nacho – Whining about wall-posts isn’t scum-hunting. Nacho in particular you’ve contributed crap this game so attacking someone else on a content basis is laughable.

@DTM – Now that your ability has really been brought front and center via the copious flavour arguments I have a few questions –

1. Please give some insight into whether this information you have re: Adell’s Dad is a one-shot deal or is a repeatable action. Your post on 6/14 seems to indicate it is. If so is it a Day action given we have a Day start?
2. Is the restriction to your identification of ‘Adult Sized’ roles consistent flavourwise in your opinion?
3. Why tactically do you think it was a good move to out your Investigative role Day 1?