Mini 971: Princess bride - They all lived .......

Jack · Post Post #625 (ISO) » Tue Jun 22, 2010 4:41 pm

Parama and SPS need to vote for someone else.

Kmd4390 · Post Post #626 (ISO) » Tue Jun 22, 2010 4:46 pm

Unvote, Vote CMAR

I actually think Parama is town as much as I hate to admit it.

Jack · Post Post #627 (ISO) » Tue Jun 22, 2010 4:57 pm

I wanna say CMAR and SPS are scum. I'm tired of parama atm.

Jack · Post Post #628 (ISO) » Tue Jun 22, 2010 5:04 pm

Steam-Powered Shovel wrote:It's in the archive.

Can you stop distracting us with irrelevancies, Parama?

REALLY SPS, HE'S DISTRACTING YOU? FROM WHAT? NOT POSTING?

Steam-Powered Shovel wrote:
ekiM wrote:Quick thought: what do people think about massclaim today?
I wouldn't be opposed to it.

SPS has already claimed and is acting very confidant in his suspicion of ekiM. No town reason for wanting massclaim.

Kmd4390 · Post Post #629 (ISO) » Tue Jun 22, 2010 5:30 pm

Wow, I forgot that Shovel had claimed.

I'm curious now why scum would (OMG I SAID "WHY SCUM WOULD", SO ITS WIFOM) kill a claimed innocent result over a cop.

Kmd4390 · Post Post #630 (ISO) » Tue Jun 22, 2010 5:31 pm

Yeah, I'd still rather lynch CMAR than Shovel.

Jack · Post Post #631 (ISO) » Tue Jun 22, 2010 5:43 pm

Yeah.

Steam-Powered Shovel · Post Post #632 (ISO) » Wed Jun 23, 2010 12:35 am

Jack wrote:SPS has already claimed and is acting very confidant in his suspicion of ekiM. No town reason for wanting massclaim.

I can see the tactical benefits of a mass claim at this time. And it's not like ekiM has claimed yet.

kmd wrote:I'm curious now why scum would (OMG I SAID "WHY SCUM WOULD", SO ITS WIFOM) kill a claimed innocent result over a cop.

Because they have a roleblocker? The innocent result insures ckd won't be lynched, ckd might have had some sort of power (as he appears to have) whereas my power was already being neutralized and the roleblock throws suspicion on me. Seriously, dude, blocking the cop and killing the innocent is the standard move.

Kmd4390 · Post Post #633 (ISO) » Wed Jun 23, 2010 5:25 am

Steam-Powered Shovel wrote: Because they have a roleblocker? The innocent result insures ckd won't be lynched, ckd might have had some sort of power (as he appears to have) whereas my power was already being neutralized and the roleblock throws suspicion on me. Seriously, dude, blocking the cop and killing the innocent is the standard move.

I'm just gonna nod and accept this answer for now. Anything else would become a useless distraction.

MacavityLock · Post Post #634 (ISO) » Thu Jun 24, 2010 8:13 am

Jack and Parama should vote for CMAR so that we don't have to wait until deadline to end the day.

Jack · Post Post #635 (ISO) » Thu Jun 24, 2010 9:26 am

I'm waiting to see what SPS and parama do with their votes.

Parama · Post Post #636 (ISO) » Thu Jun 24, 2010 9:47 am

My vote's not moving.

Parama · Post Post #637 (ISO) » Thu Jun 24, 2010 9:50 am

Mod: CMAR is due for a prod

Steam-Powered Shovel · Post Post #638 (ISO) » Thu Jun 24, 2010 11:35 am

I don't see any reason to switch my vote. I'd rather keep the ekiMwagon viable.

Jack · Post Post #639 (ISO) » Thu Jun 24, 2010 11:37 am

The ekiM wagon is so obviously dead. It has never been remotely viable.

Kmd4390 · Post Post #640 (ISO) » Thu Jun 24, 2010 11:39 am

Looks like we're gonna have to wait a couple (RL) days before we lynch CMAR then. That's ok, deadline isn't all that long of a wait.

ekiM · Post Post #641 (ISO) » Fri Jun 25, 2010 2:22 am

Parama and SPS continue to base their votes on early reads on the guy who A) decided to kill scum yesterday and B) was being pushed by scum. They give no attempt whatsoever at arguments or attempts to persuade people to vote with them. Thing is, I can't figure the point of this behavior, whatever their alignment is.

Parama wrote:I really don't think scum would pull off one player to jump onto another player that happens to be scum as well

Parama wrote:Why would scum pull away from a wagon likely to go through to lynch in order to bus a buddy to a lynch? Makes no sense. I can only see a townie doing that.

Parama wrote:If ekiM isn't scum (there's about .001% chance of this) then CMAR is next in line. Hell, if there's 2 scum left then both are scum but ekiM still needs to die first.

Massive fail. And yet interactions mean CMAR is still a better lynch.

I don't have much else to say at this point. Twiddling my thumbs until deadline. We have a big problem if the scum is not in these three.

Jack · Post Post #642 (ISO) » Fri Jun 25, 2010 2:24 am

unvote, vote:CMAR

Parama · Post Post #643 (ISO) » Fri Jun 25, 2010 2:29 am

ekiM what do the first two quotes have to do with the third? I was talking about Jack in the first two, not you, so

ekiM · Post Post #644 (ISO) » Fri Jun 25, 2010 2:33 am

Are you really this bad at logic? That is the question I have to ask myself.

Parama · Post Post #645 (ISO) » Fri Jun 25, 2010 2:47 am

At the point you vote hopped, it was tied at 3-3. I KNOW what you're implying but it's wrong.

ekiM · Post Post #646 (ISO) » Fri Jun 25, 2010 7:27 am

And horror reached that first so he would've been lynched. Except I moved my vote. Which killed DDD.

Parama · Post Post #647 (ISO) » Fri Jun 25, 2010 7:54 am

Reread the rules really quick because I wasn't sure if that was mentioned or not:

19) In the event of a tie the person who placed the first vote on person who the vote is tied with will be lynched

This is confusing as hell.

Mod, can you explain Rule 19? Or reword it?

I will admit that it seems like the same thing ekiM is saying but I have no clue what this rule is implying. It reads kinda like "the first person to place a vote on either lynchee is the one lynched instead", which is silly

Kmd4390 · Post Post #648 (ISO) » Fri Jun 25, 2010 8:32 am

Parama, we aren't lynching ekiM.

Parama · Post Post #649 (ISO) » Fri Jun 25, 2010 8:46 am

unvote

I want CMAR to be replaced (he seems to have flaked from the site - got replaced in another game) and then I want to hear from a replacement because right now he's at L-1 and I at least want a claim before the hammer.