ythan wrote:btw Lowell still hasn't posted after, as I said earlier, I saw him post in a queue.
Yup, he's been prodded; if there's no post by the evening he's getting replaced.
ythan wrote:btw Lowell still hasn't posted after, as I said earlier, I saw him post in a queue.
because ythan insisted.Lowell wrote:
Why was I the subject of instense discussion?
because he's so eloquent. and he likes youy.lowell wrote: And why does it feel like don is my publicist?
not as annoying as your playstyle.lowell wrote: His need to defend my playstyle is actually annoying.
actually, i am just learning this. never played with him before if memory serves...lowell wrote: We already know ythan is generally an idiot,
i wouldn't call it that. but whatever.lowell wrote: so I'm not sure why don and chaud needed to jump in and defend my honor.
if you say so.lowell wrote:
Also, theZerocase is nowhere, and pointless. He's town.
The middle of page four.don wrote:to which post are you referring?
Octupis wrote:I see. I was worried because if a case is put up against me that is void of logic and is complete bullshit, it is very hard to combat. I see your point that innocent townies needn't worry about how they come across, because they are ultimately innocent, but the only way to prove this definitively is upon their death. Once they are dead, they are no use to the town. I didn't want Don to make a bullshit case against me like he started on Zero in post 36.I thought that I wouldn't be able to prove him wrong unless I died and proved my innocence, but then I would be no use.I was just trying to avoid this situation. I guess I failed. I can see where you're coming from though.
lowell wrote:I decided to ISO him because his posts on page 5 (particularly defending don) seemed offputting. It turns out that's all he does. Jumps in at the middle of an argument and defends someone. He's trying to play safe and win friends. Speaking of....
Are we reading the same game? I never defended don nor did I defend you.lowell wrote:so I'm not sure why don and chaud needed to jump in and defend my honor.
WOH. What???don wrote:if you say so. unvote.
CSL's turn.
vote: CSL
^^ lowell claims to know zero is town. there's no "probably" in the sentence. unless you want to get into a long and drawn out discussion of "friends and enemies" theory, i'm not going to explain my reasoning here much further. i'm comfortabloe with lowell tieing himself to zero in such a manner. this is my all time favorite open set-up, and i have many strategies that i can employ. there are two informed minorities in this game, and towns job is to protect the masons at all costs. regardless of lowell's actual role, i like the bold move he has made as i think it can only help town.lowell wrote:Also, the Zero case is nowhere, and pointless. He's town.
Leads me to believe that you are in the opposite minority of Lowell and Zero.DJ wrote:there are two informed minorities in this game, and towns job is to protect the masons at all costs. regardless of lowell's actual role, i like the bold move he has made as i think it can only help town.
my theory is this:AKnottedRope wrote:Also
Leads me to believe that you are in the opposite minority of Lowell and Zero.DJ wrote:there are two informed minorities in this game, and towns job is to protect the masons at all costs. regardless of lowell's actual role, i like the bold move he has made as i think it can only help town.
But that leads to a bit of a problem. If you were mason and Lowell and zero were scum, then why would you unvote Zero after Lowell told you to? I may have just talked myself into voting you. I need to go back and read you and zero in ISO later.
The first priority of mine is outing scum, so I embrace "revealing conclusions." Why don't you?don_johnson wrote:however, i would rather embrace the wifom generated by lowell's statement, rather than push it to some kind of revealing conclusion as i believe it ultimately serves town's interest more than scums.
AKnottedRope wrote:Unvote, Vote: don_johnsonL-1 if I've counted correctly.
With what you said above this and with your voting patterns, that's hardly likely.don_johnson wrote:you also neglect to embrace the idea that i might be masons with lowell and i am just listening to my mason buddy.
The first priority of mine is outing scum, so I embrace "revealing conclusions." Why don't you?don_johnson wrote:however, i would rather embrace the wifom generated by lowell's statement, rather than push it to some kind of revealing conclusion as i believe it ultimately serves town's interest more than scums.