It is now Day 3. With 5 alive, 3 will lynch.
Deadline is July 18th, 2010, @ 7:00pm EST
Nobody is stupid enough to vote off their only scum teammate when there are still 5 Townies left. It's suicide, unless you're some pro trying to do some retarded 'get everyone's trust' technique. Hence we can assume Quoi is a Townie.Quoi wrote:I've just finished my first run-through of the game, and these are my first impressions:
As of mid-page 4 Doubtful's so-called sensitivity seems to me like possible scum getting frustrated or inflamed for being at L-2, a reaction which I've found to be especially frequent in players new to the site.
Alternatively, on the same page, shadow2222 does look a bit shady with his blatant refusal to answer Doubtful's questions. I do believe also that Doubtful wouldn't have pushed this scumtell on shadow as much as he would if they were both scum, so I'll continue to try and decide which of these two is scummier.
Vox is correct in pointing out that StillAwesome is lurking severely.
As I finish Page 6, I start to notice some people who seem to be jumping around from lurker wagon to flaker wagon to lurker wagon a bit too much for my tastes. These people are Me=Wierd and my predecessor, Skunkape. Me=Wierd of course also ends up on the Zajnet BW.
Zajnet ought to be lynched for trying elusive vagueness in his 11 June post where he says, without any further elaboration, "nice misrep on those quotes". He is clearly trying to buy time.
It seems that the two players that would be worse of if startransmission were still here are Me=Wierd and Doubtful.
Wierd/Doubtful scumteam looks better and better with neither of them voting for the other throughout the entire game.
Let's go ahead and VOTE: Me=Wierd for contributing less than Doubtful.
Again, it is ridiculous to try and point fingers at your only scum teammate, and so it is unlikely (more likely than Quoi) that Unloved is scum.Me=Weird wrote:My thoughts on UnLoved:
Asks what to do. Usually newbie scum who aren't quite sure what to do.
I don't get the unvoting thing. How are we supposed to get discussion if people unvote their random-votes?
Lurking is where people are up to date on everything, and could make a post, but don't. Looking at posts is not lurking. It is called reading the thread. Scum clumsily trying to explain supporting lurking?
RVS is for generating discussion about you? Most people don't like that because it means people think they're scum.
What does the difference between defensive and overly defensive have to do with someone being aggressive? There's a word for that. It's called irrelevancy.
Lurking isn't grounds for a policy lynch, it is a scumtell.
After pretty much not mentioning zaj at all, he looking for a way zaj couldn't be scum. Right after a wagon forms on zaj.
We need to find the other scum too, but not partnered with zaj, rather with you.
You don't know? Make theories!
In answer questions:
1: Yes.
1.1: UnLoved, because of the above.
2:
I believe that the scum may have killed him to set me up. A: I'm mafia(I'm not), and killed him because he was suspicious of me. Or what happened, B: See last sentence. Hence, WIFOM.
3: This one(at the top) by Karma.
I will be happy with this.
VOTE: UnLoved
Now, a quote by Karma at 10:15am, 11th of June, right after he joined.startransmission wrote:Doubtful His early posts I covered pretty well already. The defensiveness over his RV and his noticing of the RV pattern itself I've addressed. After answering my questions he FoS's Shadow for "not interpreting Zajnets vote" (and I should make clear what "the game" is... I know I'm likely missing the obvious). This bit confuses me, I'm not sure why Shadow not interpreting a vote is worthy of suspicion. Then comes a semi-post by post of me, where he considers my RV to be eccentric for not being 100% random, and declares me to be town. I respond to this post later. After answering Shadow2222s ridiculous question with a no, he moves his vote to Unloved. He points out that it puts Unloved at L-2, but seems to feel that because of the low activity it's the best vote. But he bolsters his vote with a semi-post by post of Unloved where he criticizes Unloved's voting and his comments on lurking. The following posts are where my ignorance of what this "game" is hurts me. More arguments follow about the RVS, which lead to an FoS of Zajnet. You all read this stuff for yourselves, but I will say that I like the tone of Doubtful here. He's engaging people, being vocal about his positions, and is active. For his efforts he soon finds himself at L-1, where he claims VT. He gives some last opinions on people in the game, and votes Shadow2222 which I appreciate as his lynch was very possible. I also appreciate his comment on it not being a "give-up" post. All in all, his response under pressure gives me a warm feeling. Doubtful is very low on my scumdar currently, and I find his bandwagon very interesting.
Karma wrote:The Doubtful wagon is the most interesting thing that's happened this game. I will thusly analyze it.
He jumped on the bandwagon of people finding Doubtful's bandwagon interesting (that's a complicated sentence). He knew Doubtful was going to be seen as innocent and now creates a new bandwagon on Zajnet. He comes off sounding like an experienced player, probably in an attempt to intimidate us newbies. He continuously pushes for the lynching of Zajnet.Karma wrote:Here he attacks Doubtful for not understanding the RVS. To me, Doubtful's confusion just came off as newbish, a null tell. You jumping down his neck for it is an obvious example of taking advantage of an easy target.
There are two reasons for this.Karma wrote:This is personal preference and probably should be some sort of MD thread, but I really don't think talking about town reads is scummy. Antitown could be argued, I guess, but I again disagree. Whenever I play scum, I can tell who the towniest people are. It's really quite obvious. I have NEVER (on this or my alt) been in a scum QT where one of us said "oh, x listed y on their townlist, so let's kill y." It's always "y is really protown. Let's kill him."
Anyways, I'm confident doubtful is town and I'm not afraid to say it. If you want reasons, ISO his D2 posts.
That VC alone raises suspicion on Karma even without any of the information provided in this post. He obviously didn't want to vote for me=weird after everyone else as that'll be seen as jumping on the bandwagon.CSL wrote:The Fourth Vote Count of Day Two
Me=Weird (3) Quoi, AurorusVox, Porochaz
UnLoved (2) Karma, Me=Weird
Not Voting: UnLoved, Doubtful
With 7 alive, 4 will execute
If stillawesome is lynched and revealed to be the mafia, me=weird gains all the credit for starting the bandwagon.@STM: You said that Post 19 specifically had expressed your stance, not that you had expressed your stance. Needless to say, post 19 didn't express your stance. Is it bad to vote someone for not posting when they said they would? However, I am thinking you're slightly townish. The vote was mostly pressure, but now I have a new time to expect it, so I'll take it off.
Just now I wrote:
Is it bad to vote someone for not posting when they said they would?
With that,
Unvote, Vote: StillAwesome
Then, stillawesome was replaced by Karma who, upon realising the situation, immediately directed all attention to Zajnet. As I mentioned before, me=weird jumped on this bandwagon. Take a look for yourself and tell me that this isn't suspicious in any way.StillAwesome: Please post! You said you would have a "nice, juicy post tonight" a week ago!! Actually, MOD: PLEASE PROD STILLAWESOME IT'S BEEN A WEEK SINCE HIS LAST POST
Doesn't give a reason, doesn't give any content, just follows his fellow teammate.Hmm. A case on Zaj. Actually, scratch that. A good case on Zaj. Good enough for me to vote him. But I'm still suspicious of Skunk!! Speaking of which,
Mod: Prod on Skunkape?
Unvote, Vote: Zajnet
Did someone say bussing?Me=Weird wrote: @STM: You said that Post 19 specifically had expressed your stance, not that you had expressed your stance. Needless to say, post 19 didn't express your stance. Is it bad to vote someone for not posting when they said they would? However, I am thinking you're slightly townish. The vote was mostly pressure, but now I have a new time to expect it, so I'll take it off.
Just now I wrote:
Is it bad to vote someone for not posting when they said they would?
With that,
Unvote, Vote: StillAwesome
I don't understand this.youngminii wrote:If we assume Porochaz wasn't bussing, then all the evidence points towards Karma. If we don't, then most of the evidence still points towards Karma.
Unloved's favourite role is scum. His level of activity hasn't been that great. If I were in my favourite role, I'd be checking the game quite often. Now this doesn't cross off the possibility of lurking, which is evident:UnLoved wrote:1. I've played 5 games, won 4/5 of them.
2. My favorite role to play is scum. But I've only been scum once in my past games.
3. I don't feel anything about policy lynches, as in most of my games, we have not needed to do that. Let's hope this game doesn't become inactive enough for us to policy lynch. Lurking can be good, or bad. It's always good to lurk a little if you haven't posted in a while. Otherwise, someone could misread posts and say something wrong.
4. Uhh, I don't see much else to do in the beginning of the game, so I'm all for RVS.
So clearly, there's been at least some lurking going on by Unloved, especially recently. But as said in the quote, he doesn't think that lurking is wrong if you've been V/LA, as he has. Wouldn't it be funny though, if he IS the scum and simply didn't post so that we could kill each other off? Very WIFOM but it's just some food for thought.MafiaScum wrote:Last visited:Tue Jun 29, 2010 6:33 am
This is right when me=weird was at L-1. Why wouldn't he just finish him off? I mean, maybe that was to hide the fact that he's scum (combined with me=weird's suicide) but that level of play is a bit higher than someone that's only played 5 games in their life, and especially only one being scum.Unloved wrote:V/LA until Sunday. Just to let you know.