DrippingGoofball wrote:BloodCovenent wrote:But... in DGB's defense.... why would she claim it... if there was a thought that someone would CC it?
^^^ and this isn't even the smallest hint that I can only be town... only everyone has got blinders on, and no one is using their brains.
Why would she have thought there was someone to contradict it? That's only if xReck is scum and is also lying about not having noticed the pm. DGB had her back to the wall and needed a claim, she would be lynched way before now if she hadn't.
The theories that I be in cahoots with cRECK as especially preposterous, topped with allegations of daytalk. I can't understand why some players can wrap their minds around the notion that two daytalking scumz would come up with contradictory stories, then stick to them. There's something very wrong with any player willing to consider something so completely absurd, like, they have a scum wincon.
xReck can be innocent. But you would be forced to have contradicting stories if you were scum together. xReck
did
receive a package from BC, and you, if you were town,
couldn't possibly know about it
and so you would have to contradict him. You couldn't possibly have claimed to send both packages, and he couldn't possible have claimed to receive only one.
Basing a vote on the basis that I neglected to send in a choice on a game that disgusted me so much that I eventually wanted to be replaced, me, who is know not to request replacements, is nuts. It's the flimsiest of reasons - one that I can see a scum hang on to, because the sheep might follow.
Jack wrote:DrippingGoofball wrote:Notice that he didn't give the investigation to Jack, who had "caught" CMAR.
But he did give him BP the next night.
BloodCovenant, on D1 when he would be sending in his orders wrote:I think jack is a scum gambit.
Unvote:
Vote: Jack
DGB wrote:Jack is town because there is no scum motive for such a gambit. No reward, high risk. I believe his suspicions are absolutely genuine - and probably correct.
She believes that I am town and right that Soc and CMAR are scum. She is so sure that soc is scum that she is persistently voting him over CMAR. But she doesn't send me an investigation? She goes v/la for 3 days and doesn't send one?
Jack wrote:DrippingGoofball wrote:Jack wrote:She believes that I am town and right that Soc and CMAR are scum. She is so sure that soc is scum that she is persistently voting him over CMAR. But she doesn't send me an investigation? She goes v/la for 3 days and doesn't send one?
Jesus. I didn't send an action. I stopped reading the game, awaiting replacement.
So you didn't send an action because you thought you'd be replaced before the day ended?
DrippingGoofball wrote:Also, I completely stopped caring, because the atmosphere was so unpleasant.
Jack wrote:DrippingGoofball wrote:Also, I completely stopped caring, because the atmosphere was so unpleasant.
You asked for replacement on D2, which was the day you've said you sent an action in.
DrippingGoofball wrote:Jack wrote:You asked for replacement on D2, which was the day you've said you sent an action in.
Then I must have simply forgot.
I think too few people have played with scum who will repeatedly and emphatically say something they know is false. Like "I didn't send an action because I wanted to be replaced". That was D2, and the lack of action-sending was supposed to be D1.