Mini 985:Madness at Night: Game over

[hiphop]

Spyrex-why not sando?

nopo i don't like clicking submit twice.

And now spyrex does it.
Can't you just let me post?

So vote with me Spyrex. Townies should stick together, and I don't like a llama lynch.

[podium123456]

Haykers last vote count was wrong. I have corrected it, and updated it to current:



Vote count

Llamaeatataco 3 - (Sando, Charter, spyrex)

podium123456 1 - (AlmasterGM)

nopointinactingup 3 - ( Wickedestjr, Super Smash Bros. Fan)

Sando 4 - (llamaeatataco, podium123456, hiphop, nopointinactingup)

Wickedestjr 1 - (crypto)



With 11 alive, it takes 6 votes to lynch

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Crypto, please change to sando ASAP if you are willing to lynch. If you arent willing to lynch, i want to hear your reason.

[hiphop]

Interesting, (Almaster comment on my interesting ) Podium never commented on my wall. Why am I special?

[hiphop]

your vote count is wrong, only two people are voting for nopo.

[nopointinactingup]

@hiphop: Huh?

[hiphop]

@hiphop: Huh?

what is the huh supposed to mean?

[podium123456]

Interesting, (Almaster comment on my interesting ) Podium never commented on my wall. Why am I special?

It's coming. I'm a very busy man right now. (no not with rl, with this game)

your vote count is wrong, only two people are voting for nopo.

ty

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

CORRECTED VOTE COUNT:

Vote count

Llamaeatataco 3 - (Sando, Charter, spyrex)

podium123456 1 - (AlmasterGM)

nopointinactingup 2 - ( Wickedestjr, Super Smash Bros. Fan)

Sando 4 - (llamaeatataco, podium123456, hiphop, nopointinactingup)

Wickedestjr 1 - (crypto)



With 11 alive, it takes 6 votes to lynch

[hiphop]

Don't really care for a wall. Just a summary of why I am town or scum is fine.

[hiphop]

Spyrex-why not vote Sando now?

[nopointinactingup]

nopo i don't like clicking submit twice.

No, what's this supposed to mean?

[podium123456]

Don't really care for a wall. Just a summary of why I am town or scum is fine.

Huh?

In the past you have criticized me for not answering questions. In your last wall, you repeated a question i had asked to set aside for now, in addition to asking a multitude of new questions.

Now you tell me to just summarize why you are town or scum.



Explain.

[hiphop]

It won't let me post when someone else does. So I click submit, and a post that was just written by someone else appears above the box. I didn't hit preview, and I didn't write that post. So i have to click submit again. Don't like clicking it twice, so please do not post when I do.

Podium- simple, I hate walls except when I write them. Remember in the last game where I said you could strawman me if you want.

[nopointinactingup]

Right. But how would I know if you're posting or not o_0?
Hiphop and Podium have been scumpartners?

[hiphop]

You just have to know. And no.

[SpyreX]

SIR YES SIR

Unvote, Vote: Sando

I'm on record, again, that there is a scum between charter and SSBF.

I'm also on record that today has been more retarded than most.

I'm additionally on record that if this is a town flip llama dies soon. And if that is a scum flip podium dies.

[hiphop]

L-1. Any takers?

[Sando]

What am I being lynched on? A supposed 'slip' that Podium is simply making up.

I said I'd be busy because of end of financial year, I forgot to vote the night I said I would because I was dead tired and fell asleep, so I did it the next morning, then made one more response just as I got to work, and haven't had a chance to post until now, lunch the next day, I don't see how that contradicts anything I ever did, or constitutes 'lurking'.

Podium seems to be claiming that me saying 'I'll only vote Llama to avoid a NL' and then voting Llama, who at the time was equal top wagon, within 24 hours of deadline is somehow me lying. I said I'd only vote Llama to avoid a NL, and did exactly that.

Am I missing anything? Or is this BS seriously all that there is?

[hiphop]

Claim?

[Sando]

VT

[Sando]

BTW, the idea that scum have pretty obviously set up at least 1-2 days worth of lynches surrounding the claims, then seem to have successfully moved away from that today onto a townie is pretty rediculous.

It's pretty obvious that the amount of WIFOM that's going to be flying around for the next 2 days is going to be pretty rediculous, lynching a townie before even attempting to limit it's effect is just plain stupid.

[podium123456]

What am I being lynched on? A supposed 'slip' that Podium is simply making up.

Podium seems to be claiming that me saying 'I'll only vote Llama to avoid a NL' and then voting Llama, who at the time was equal top wagon, within 24 hours of deadline is somehow me lying. I said I'd only vote Llama to avoid a NL, and did exactly that.

Am I missing anything? Or is this BS seriously all that there is?

Oh you are missing something. The part where you called llama a town read, and said he was a bad lynch... and then, when presented with a scum case that you agreed was 'ok', you continue with your town lynch because the other person wasn't 'OBVIOUS' scum.

It's all right here.

http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 4#p2344924

[Sando]

Ok hiphop, I thought you meant that because of the miller, the 2 PRs were more likely. You're saying 2 PRs (non-fake) make the miller more likely? Yeah that makes sense.

2 investigative roles is retardedly good, yes SSBF. For reference, I've only played 1 game with more than 1 investigative role in it as town, and Spyrex modded it I believe (PYP). There were also more players in that game, and the investigative roles still dominated the game and the scum never stood a chance. And that was a tracker/gunsmith combo, cop/gunsmith would be more broken I feel.

Unvote, Vote: SSBF

I'm going to trust the scum-read on SSBF over the more legit claim I think here. I'm of the opinion that Llama is floundering town, I don't think he's a good lynch, and having this cop/gunsmith dominate 2 days doesn't seem like a good idea.

Will only vote Llama for a deadline lynch

.

That is L-2

You're also completely ignoring this post. Way to misrepresent me, I specifically stated that I would vote Llama despite my read in order to try and ensure that there was not a NL.

[podium123456]

You're also completely ignoring this post. Way to misrepresent me, I specifically stated that I would vote Llama despite my read in order to try and ensure that there was not a NL.

You're missing the point. Why vote off a town read, if a scummy move has been committed and there is support/time for the lynch.

The problem now (for you) is that YOU committed a scummier action by doing that, than the scummy action in question. That is compounded by the previous cases against you.

[Sando]

Wicked was certainly was not a viable candidate for lynch at that stage, and I did not have time to do much. You're blatantly taking advantage of the fact that I did not have time. My vote was best left on Llama because it was the most likely useful lynch.

I had no idea if wicked was going to attract other votes, I went and did exactly what I said I'd do, voted Llama to try and ensure no NL. Mind justifying to me how Wicked is or was a reasonable chance of being lynched? Or would you rather just make stuff up with no actual evidence?

[Sando]

I also like how you've thrown a case down on everyone basically, hoping against hope that one of them will stick, and then attacked anyone who didn't blindly go along with you.

Unvote, Vote: Podium

You claim to have offered opinions on the claims business, then do literally everything to try and get someone, anyone, else lynched. At least people like Spyrex have actually said their feelings and made their position well known.